Nicoline G Ambrose1, Ehud Yairi2, Torrey M Loucks2, Carol Hubbard Seery3, Rebecca Throneburg4. 1. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, United States. Electronic address: nambrose@illinois.edu. 2. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, United States. 3. University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, United States. 4. Eastern Illinois University, United States.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the presence of any patterns reflecting underlying subtypes of persistence and recovery across epidemiologic, motor, language, and temperament domains in the same group of children beginning to stutter and followed for several years. METHODS: Participants were 58 2-4-year-old CWS and 40 age and gender matched NFC from four different sites in the Midwest. At the end of the multi-year study, stuttering children were classified as Persistent or Recovered. The same protocol obtaining data to measure stuttering, motor, language and temperament characteristics was used at each site. They have not been included in previous reports. RESULTS: The Persistent group performed consistently differently from the Recovered and Control groups. They performed lower on standardized language tests and in phonological accuracy, had greater kinematic variability, and were judged by their parents to be more negative in temperament. CONCLUSIONS: The present study provides data supporting the hypothesis that subtypes of stuttering can be identified along persistency/recovery lines, but results were not definitive. EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES: Readers will be able to (a) describe the current state of subtypes of stuttering research; (b) summarize possible contributions of epidemiologic, motoric, linguistic and temperament to such subtyping with regard to persistency and recovery.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the presence of any patterns reflecting underlying subtypes of persistence and recovery across epidemiologic, motor, language, and temperament domains in the same group of children beginning to stutter and followed for several years. METHODS:Participants were 58 2-4-year-old CWS and 40 age and gender matched NFC from four different sites in the Midwest. At the end of the multi-year study, stuttering children were classified as Persistent or Recovered. The same protocol obtaining data to measure stuttering, motor, language and temperament characteristics was used at each site. They have not been included in previous reports. RESULTS: The Persistent group performed consistently differently from the Recovered and Control groups. They performed lower on standardized language tests and in phonological accuracy, had greater kinematic variability, and were judged by their parents to be more negative in temperament. CONCLUSIONS: The present study provides data supporting the hypothesis that subtypes of stuttering can be identified along persistency/recovery lines, but results were not definitive. EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES: Readers will be able to (a) describe the current state of subtypes of stuttering research; (b) summarize possible contributions of epidemiologic, motoric, linguistic and temperament to such subtyping with regard to persistency and recovery.
Authors: Dahye Choi; Edward G Conture; Victoria Tumanova; Chagit E Clark; Tedra A Walden; Robin M Jones Journal: J Commun Disord Date: 2017-11-26 Impact factor: 2.288
Authors: Hatun Zengin-Bolatkale; Edward G Conture; Alexandra P Key; Tedra A Walden; Robin M Jones Journal: J Fluency Disord Date: 2018-04-19 Impact factor: 2.538