Literature DB >> 26117367

Intrinsic functional connectivity differentiates minimally conscious from unresponsive patients.

Athena Demertzi1, Georgios Antonopoulos2, Lizette Heine2, Henning U Voss3, Julia Sophia Crone4, Carlo de Los Angeles5, Mohamed Ali Bahri6, Carol Di Perri2, Audrey Vanhaudenhuyse7, Vanessa Charland-Verville2, Martin Kronbichler8, Eugen Trinka9, Christophe Phillips6, Francisco Gomez10, Luaba Tshibanda11, Andrea Soddu12, Nicholas D Schiff13, Susan Whitfield-Gabrieli5, Steven Laureys2.   

Abstract

Despite advances in resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging investigations, clinicians remain with the challenge of how to implement this paradigm on an individualized basis. Here, we assessed the clinical relevance of resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging acquisitions in patients with disorders of consciousness by means of a systems-level approach. Three clinical centres collected data from 73 patients in minimally conscious state, vegetative state/unresponsive wakefulness syndrome and coma. The main analysis was performed on the data set coming from one centre (Liège) including 51 patients (26 minimally conscious state, 19 vegetative state/unresponsive wakefulness syndrome, six coma; 15 females; mean age 49 ± 18 years, range 11-87; 16 traumatic, 32 non-traumatic of which 13 anoxic, three mixed; 35 patients assessed >1 month post-insult) for whom the clinical diagnosis with the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised was congruent with positron emission tomography scanning. Group-level functional connectivity was investigated for the default mode, frontoparietal, salience, auditory, sensorimotor and visual networks using a multiple-seed correlation approach. Between-group inferential statistics and machine learning were used to identify each network's capacity to discriminate between patients in minimally conscious state and vegetative state/unresponsive wakefulness syndrome. Data collected from 22 patients scanned in two other centres (Salzburg: 10 minimally conscious state, five vegetative state/unresponsive wakefulness syndrome; New York: five minimally conscious state, one vegetative state/unresponsive wakefulness syndrome, one emerged from minimally conscious state) were used to validate the classification with the selected features. Coma Recovery Scale-Revised total scores correlated with key regions of each network reflecting their involvement in consciousness-related processes. All networks had a high discriminative capacity (>80%) for separating patients in a minimally conscious state and vegetative state/unresponsive wakefulness syndrome. Among them, the auditory network was ranked the most highly. The regions of the auditory network which were more functionally connected in patients in minimally conscious state compared to vegetative state/unresponsive wakefulness syndrome encompassed bilateral auditory and visual cortices. Connectivity values in these three regions discriminated congruently 20 of 22 independently assessed patients. Our findings point to the significance of preserved abilities for multisensory integration and top-down processing in minimal consciousness seemingly supported by auditory-visual crossmodal connectivity, and promote the clinical utility of the resting paradigm for single-patient diagnostics.
© The Author (2015). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anoxia; consciousness; resting state connectivity; sensory systems; traumatic brain injury

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26117367     DOI: 10.1093/brain/awv169

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain        ISSN: 0006-8950            Impact factor:   13.501


  99 in total

1.  Measuring Depth in Still Water: Electrophysiologic Indicators of Residual Consciousness in the Unresponsive Patient.

Authors:  Matthew A Koenig; Peter W Kaplan
Journal:  Epilepsy Curr       Date:  2018 May-Jun       Impact factor: 7.500

Review 2.  A Novel Prognostic Approach to Predict Recovery in Patients with Chronic Disorders of Consciousness.

Authors:  Wangxiao Bao; Xiaoxia Li; Benyan Luo
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2019-03-22       Impact factor: 5.203

Review 3.  The Clinical, Philosophical, Evolutionary and Mathematical Machinery of Consciousness: An Analytic Dissection of the Field Theories and a Consilience of Ideas.

Authors:  Hassan Kesserwani
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-12-18

Review 4.  Functional Networks in Disorders of Consciousness.

Authors:  Yelena G Bodien; Camille Chatelle; Brian L Edlow
Journal:  Semin Neurol       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 3.420

Review 5.  Are the Neural Correlates of Consciousness in the Front or in the Back of the Cerebral Cortex? Clinical and Neuroimaging Evidence.

Authors:  Melanie Boly; Marcello Massimini; Naotsugu Tsuchiya; Bradley R Postle; Christof Koch; Giulio Tononi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 6.  Consciousness Regained: Disentangling Mechanisms, Brain Systems, and Behavioral Responses.

Authors:  Johan F Storm; Mélanie Boly; Adenauer G Casali; Marcello Massimini; Umberto Olcese; Cyriel M A Pennartz; Melanie Wilke
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Simultaneous EEG-PET-fMRI measurements in disorders of consciousness: an exploratory study on diagnosis and prognosis.

Authors:  Daniel Golkowski; Katharina Merz; Caroline Mlynarcik; Tobias Kiel; Barbara Schorr; Alex Lopez-Rolon; Mathias Lukas; Denis Jordan; Andreas Bender; Rüdiger Ilg
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 4.849

8.  Degrees of functional connectome abnormality in disorders of consciousness.

Authors:  Dmitry O Sinitsyn; Liudmila A Legostaeva; Elena I Kremneva; Sofya N Morozova; Alexandra G Poydasheva; Elizaveta G Mochalova; Oksana G Chervyakova; Julia V Ryabinkina; Natalia A Suponeva; Michael A Piradov
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-03-25       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Functional MRI for Assessment of the Default Mode Network in Acute Brain Injury.

Authors:  Daniel Kondziella; Patrick M Fisher; Vibeke Andrée Larsen; John Hauerberg; Martin Fabricius; Kirsten Møller; Gitte Moos Knudsen
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.210

10.  Exploration of Functional Connectivity During Preferred Music Stimulation in Patients with Disorders of Consciousness.

Authors:  Lizette Heine; Maïté Castro; Charlotte Martial; Barbara Tillmann; Steven Laureys; Fabien Perrin
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-11-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.