V Beltrame1, M Gruppo1, D Pastorelli2, S Pedrazzoli1, S Merigliano1, C Sperti3. 1. Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, 3rd Surgical Clinic, University of Padua, via Giustiniani 2, 35128 Padua, Italy. 2. Department of Oncology, Veneto Institute of Oncology, IOV, via Gattamelata 64, 35128 Padua, Italy. 3. Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, 3rd Surgical Clinic, University of Padua, via Giustiniani 2, 35128 Padua, Italy. Electronic address: csperti@libero.it.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Pancreatic and perampullary neoplasms in patients aged 80 or older trouble the surgeons because of the risk of surgical treatment. We have reviewed our experience and literature's reports of pancreaticoduodenectomy in octogenarians, evaluating early results and long-term survival in pancreatic cancer group. METHODS: Three hundred eighty-five patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy for neoplasms from 1998 to 2011 were included in the study, and were divided in two groups: group 1, patients younger than 80 years of age, and group 2, patients 80 years of age and older. Operative morbidity, mortality, disease-free and long-term survival were analysed. English literature was systematically searched for pancreatic resection's outcome in octogenarians. RESULTS: There were 385 pancreaticoduodenectomies: 362 patients were in group 1 and 23 patients in group 2. There was no significant difference regarding gender, and pathologic findings between the two groups. Complications' rate (40 vs. 43%), mortality rate (4% vs. 0%), and overall median survival for pancreatic cancer patients were not statistically different in the two groups (median 21 vs. 19 months). Literature's review showed 14 reports of pancreatic resection in octogenarians. Most of the studies (particularly in centres with high-volume pancreatic surgery) showed that outcome after pancreatectomy was not different in octogenarians or in younger patients. CONCLUSION: Pancreaticoduodenectomy is an acceptable option for elderly patients. Age alone should not be considered a contraindication to major pancreatic resection, but a careful preoperative evaluation and an accurate postoperative management are mandatory.
INTRODUCTION:Pancreatic and perampullary neoplasms in patients aged 80 or older trouble the surgeons because of the risk of surgical treatment. We have reviewed our experience and literature's reports of pancreaticoduodenectomy in octogenarians, evaluating early results and long-term survival in pancreatic cancer group. METHODS: Three hundred eighty-five patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy for neoplasms from 1998 to 2011 were included in the study, and were divided in two groups: group 1, patients younger than 80 years of age, and group 2, patients 80 years of age and older. Operative morbidity, mortality, disease-free and long-term survival were analysed. English literature was systematically searched for pancreatic resection's outcome in octogenarians. RESULTS: There were 385 pancreaticoduodenectomies: 362 patients were in group 1 and 23 patients in group 2. There was no significant difference regarding gender, and pathologic findings between the two groups. Complications' rate (40 vs. 43%), mortality rate (4% vs. 0%), and overall median survival for pancreatic cancerpatients were not statistically different in the two groups (median 21 vs. 19 months). Literature's review showed 14 reports of pancreatic resection in octogenarians. Most of the studies (particularly in centres with high-volume pancreatic surgery) showed that outcome after pancreatectomy was not different in octogenarians or in younger patients. CONCLUSION: Pancreaticoduodenectomy is an acceptable option for elderly patients. Age alone should not be considered a contraindication to major pancreatic resection, but a careful preoperative evaluation and an accurate postoperative management are mandatory.
Authors: Rebecca S Meltzer; David A Kooby; Jeffrey M Switchenko; Jashodeep Datta; Darren R Carpizo; Shishir K Maithel; Mihir M Shah Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2020-11-03 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Daniel S Rubin; Megan Huisingh-Scheetz; Mark K Ferguson; Peter Nagele; Carol J Peden; Diane S Lauderdale Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2021-05-10 Impact factor: 7.538
Authors: Ying Liu; Sukhwinder Kaur; Ying Huang; Johannes F Fahrmann; Jo Ann Rinaudo; Samir M Hanash; Surinder K Batra; Aatur D Singhi; Randall E Brand; Anirban Maitra; Brian B Haab Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2020-06-12 Impact factor: 4.254