Literature DB >> 26117074

The influence of cycle time on shoulder fatigue responses for a fixed total overhead workload.

Clark R Dickerson1, Kimberly A Meszaros2, Alan C Cudlip2, Jaclyn N Chopp-Hurley2, Joseph E Langenderfer3.   

Abstract

The relationship between overhead work and musculoskeletal health depends on multiple task and individual factors. Knowledge gaps persist, despite examination of many of these factors individually and in combination. This investigation targeted task variation, as parameterized by cycle time within a fixed overall workload. Participants performed an intermittent overhead pressing task with four different cycle time conditions while overall workload and duty cycle was held constant. Several manifestations of fatigue were monitored during task performance. Endurance time was influenced by cycle time with shorter cycle times having endurance times up to 25% higher than longer cycle times. Surface electromyography (sEMG) results were mixed, with two muscles demonstrating amplitude increases (middle deltoid and upper trapezius) that varied with cycle time. sEMG frequency was not influenced by cycle time for any muscle monitored, despite decreases for several cycle times. Trends existed for the influence of cycle time on time-varying reported discomfort (p=0.056) and static strength (p=0.055); large effect sizes were present (ηp(2)=0.31 and 0.27, respectively). The equivocal association of fatigue indicators and cycle time is analogous to the influence of other factors implicated in overhead work musculoskeletal risk, and probabilistic modeling offers a compelling avenue for integration of the known variation in the many factors that combine to inform this risk.
Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cycle time; Fatigue; Job rotation; Shoulder; Task variation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26117074     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.04.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  3 in total

1.  Wearable Monitoring Devices for Biomechanical Risk Assessment at Work: Current Status and Future Challenges-A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ranavolo Alberto; Francesco Draicchio; Tiwana Varrecchia; Alessio Silvetti; Sergio Iavicoli
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  Stress-Related Responses to Alternations between Repetitive Physical Work and Cognitive Tasks of Different Difficulties.

Authors:  Susanna Mixter; Svend Erik Mathiassen; Petra Lindfors; Kent Dimberg; Helena Jahncke; Eugene Lyskov; David M Hallman
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Adapting a fatigue model for shoulder flexion fatigue: Enhancing recovery rate during intermittent rest intervals.

Authors:  John M Looft; Laura A Frey-Law
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 2.712

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.