R W Dal Negro1, M Visconti2, P Turco3. 1. National Centre for Respiratory Pharmacoeconomics and Pharmacoepidemiology (CESFAR), Verona, Italy. Electronic address: robertodalnegro@gmail.com. 2. BioLab, Bussolengo General Hospital, ULSS22 Regione Veneto, Italy. Electronic address: mvisconti@ulss22.ven.it. 3. Research & Clinical Governance (R&CG), Verona, Italy. Electronic address: turcop@libero.it.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) are associated with increased airway and systemic inflammation. There is evidence that erdosteine accelerates recovery from AECOPD by reducing airway inflammation. AIM: To investigate the dose-dependent antioxidant/anti-inflammatory activity of erdosteine in COPD patients. METHODS: In this single-centre, double blind, double dummy study, patients with mild-to-moderate COPD (GOLD stage II-III), were randomised to receive either placebo or two dosages of oral erdosteine (300 mg tid or 300 mg bid + 1 capsule of indistinguishable placebo) for 28 days in addition to their standard treatment. Primary variables were plasma reactive oxygen species (ROS) and 8-isoprostane levels, while secondary variable was lung function (FEV1; FEV1/FVC; FEV1 short-term reversibility), all assessed in baseline; every two weeks during the study, and one week after the end of the study. RESULTS:Baseline demographic characteristics, plasma ROS and 8-isoprostane levels and lung function were not significantly different in the 24 eligible patients (14 males, aged 38-75 years). At 2 weeks, there was a dose-dependent decrease in ROS in the erdosteine groups. By week 4 there were significant differences in ROS levels compared to baseline between patients receiving 900 mg/day (p < 0.003) and those receiving 600 mg/day (p < 0.04). This effect continued in the follow-up week (p < 0.021). Erdosteine also lowered 8-isoprostane plasma levels after 4 weeks (p < 0.01), and this effect lasted over the post-treatment week. Moreover, % FEV1 reversibility after salbutamol 400 mcg obtained after a 4 -week treatment of erdosteine 900 mg/day was significantly higher than that obtained after 600 mg/day (p < 0.01). Erdosteine was well tolerated and no treatment-related adverse event was reported. CONCLUSIONS: Results confirm the antioxidant dose- and time-dependent activity of erdosteine, and support the utility of including erdosteine it in the therapeutic strategy for the prevention and treatment of oxidative stress-induced inflammation, which frequently leads to AECOPD occurrence.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) are associated with increased airway and systemic inflammation. There is evidence that erdosteine accelerates recovery from AECOPD by reducing airway inflammation. AIM: To investigate the dose-dependent antioxidant/anti-inflammatory activity of erdosteine in COPD patients. METHODS: In this single-centre, double blind, double dummy study, patients with mild-to-moderate COPD (GOLD stage II-III), were randomised to receive either placebo or two dosages of oral erdosteine (300 mg tid or 300 mg bid + 1 capsule of indistinguishable placebo) for 28 days in addition to their standard treatment. Primary variables were plasma reactive oxygen species (ROS) and 8-isoprostane levels, while secondary variable was lung function (FEV1; FEV1/FVC; FEV1 short-term reversibility), all assessed in baseline; every two weeks during the study, and one week after the end of the study. RESULTS: Baseline demographic characteristics, plasma ROS and 8-isoprostane levels and lung function were not significantly different in the 24 eligible patients (14 males, aged 38-75 years). At 2 weeks, there was a dose-dependent decrease in ROS in the erdosteine groups. By week 4 there were significant differences in ROS levels compared to baseline between patients receiving 900 mg/day (p < 0.003) and those receiving 600 mg/day (p < 0.04). This effect continued in the follow-up week (p < 0.021). Erdosteine also lowered 8-isoprostane plasma levels after 4 weeks (p < 0.01), and this effect lasted over the post-treatment week. Moreover, % FEV1 reversibility after salbutamol 400 mcg obtained after a 4 -week treatment of erdosteine 900 mg/day was significantly higher than that obtained after 600 mg/day (p < 0.01). Erdosteine was well tolerated and no treatment-related adverse event was reported. CONCLUSIONS: Results confirm the antioxidant dose- and time-dependent activity of erdosteine, and support the utility of including erdosteine it in the therapeutic strategy for the prevention and treatment of oxidative stress-induced inflammation, which frequently leads to AECOPD occurrence.