Literature DB >> 26116266

Density-dependent prey mortality is determined by the spatial scale of predator foraging.

Erin K McCarthy1,2, J Wilson White3.   

Abstract

Foraging theory predicts which prey patches predators should target. However, in most habitats, what constitutes a 'patch' and how prey density is calculated are subjective concepts and depend on the spatial scale at which the predator (or scientist) is observing. Moreover, the predator's 'foraging scale' affects prey population dynamics: predators should produce directly density-dependent (DDD) prey mortality at the foraging scale, but inversely density-dependent (IDD) mortality (safety-in-numbers) at smaller scales. We performed the first experimental test of these predictions using behavioral assays with guppies (Poecilia reticulata) feeding on bloodworm 'prey' patches. The guppy's foraging scale had already been estimated in a prior study. Our experimental results confirmed theoretical predictions: predation was IDD when prey were aggregated at a scale smaller than the foraging scale, but not when prey were aggregated at larger scales. These results could be used to predict outcomes of predator-prey interactions in continuous, non-discrete habitats in the field.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Foraging scale; Foraging theory; Patch selection; Predator–prey interactions; Scale-dependent interactions

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26116266     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-015-3374-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  4 in total

Review 1.  Functional responses and scaling in predator-prey interactions of marine fishes: contemporary issues and emerging concepts.

Authors:  Mary E Hunsicker; Lorenzo Ciannelli; Kevin M Bailey; Jeffrey A Buckel; J Wilson White; Jason S Link; Timothy E Essington; Sarah Gaichas; Todd W Anderson; Richard D Brodeur; Kung-Sik Chan; Kun Chen; Göran Englund; Kenneth T Frank; Vânia Freitas; Mark A Hixon; Thomas Hurst; Darren W Johnson; James F Kitchell; Doug Reese; George A Rose; Henrik Sjodin; William J Sydeman; Henk W van der Veer; Knut Vollset; Stephani Zador
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 9.492

2.  Synthesizing mechanisms of density dependence in reef fishes: behavior, habitat configuration, and observational scale.

Authors:  J Wilson White; Jameal F Samhouri; Adrian C Stier; Clare L Wormald; Scott L Hamilton; Stuart A Sandin
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 5.499

3.  Safety in numbers and the spatial scaling of density-dependent mortality in a coral reef fish.

Authors:  J Wilson White; Robert R Warner
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 5.499

4.  Experimental determination of the spatial scale of a prey patch from the predator's perspective.

Authors:  Matthew A Birk; J Wilson White
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-11-17       Impact factor: 3.225

  4 in total
  1 in total

1.  Diverse foraging opportunities drive the functional response of local and landscape-scale bear predation on Pacific salmon.

Authors:  Thomas P Quinn; Curry J Cunningham; Aaron J Wirsing
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 3.225

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.