Henry T Stelfox1, Sean M Bagshaw2, Song Gao3. 1. Departments of Critical Care Medicine, Medicine, and Community Health Sciences, Institute for Public Health, University of Calgary and Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Canada. Electronic address: tstelfox@ucalgary.ca. 2. Division of Critical Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta and Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Canada. Electronic address: sean.bagshaw@albertahealthservices.ca. 3. Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Canada. Electronic address: sgaoaaa@gmail.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The proportion of elderly patients is increasing, but it is unknown if there are age-based differences in care of hospitalized patients with sudden clinical deterioration. We sought to examine the relation between patient age and care for hospitalized patients experiencing sudden clinical deterioration. METHODS: We identified hospitalized adults (n = 5103) in 4 hospitals with sudden clinical deteriorations triggering medical emergency team (MET) activation between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2009. We compared intensive care unit (ICU) admission rates (within 2 hours of MET activation), goals of care (resuscitative vs nonresuscitative), and hospital mortality according to age (<50, 50-64, 65-79, and 80+ years), adjusting for patient, physician, and hospital characteristics. RESULTS: Age was associated with decreased likelihood of admission to ICU (P < .0001) and increased likelihood of change in goals of care (P < .0001). Compared to patients younger than 50 years, patients 80 years or older had 67% lower odds of ICU admission (odds ratio, 0.33; 95% confidence interval, 0.26-0.41) and 587% higher odds (odds ratio, 6.87; 95% confidence interval, 4.20-11.26) of having their goals of care changed to exclude resuscitation. Hospital mortality was associated with patient age, ranging from 15% to 46% (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Patient age is associated with care for hospitalized patients with sudden clinical deterioration, suggesting that strategies to guide care of elderly patients during MET activation may be beneficial.
PURPOSE: The proportion of elderly patients is increasing, but it is unknown if there are age-based differences in care of hospitalized patients with sudden clinical deterioration. We sought to examine the relation between patient age and care for hospitalized patients experiencing sudden clinical deterioration. METHODS: We identified hospitalized adults (n = 5103) in 4 hospitals with sudden clinical deteriorations triggering medical emergency team (MET) activation between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2009. We compared intensive care unit (ICU) admission rates (within 2 hours of MET activation), goals of care (resuscitative vs nonresuscitative), and hospital mortality according to age (<50, 50-64, 65-79, and 80+ years), adjusting for patient, physician, and hospital characteristics. RESULTS: Age was associated with decreased likelihood of admission to ICU (P < .0001) and increased likelihood of change in goals of care (P < .0001). Compared to patients younger than 50 years, patients 80 years or older had 67% lower odds of ICU admission (odds ratio, 0.33; 95% confidence interval, 0.26-0.41) and 587% higher odds (odds ratio, 6.87; 95% confidence interval, 4.20-11.26) of having their goals of care changed to exclude resuscitation. Hospital mortality was associated with patient age, ranging from 15% to 46% (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS:Patient age is associated with care for hospitalized patients with sudden clinical deterioration, suggesting that strategies to guide care of elderly patients during MET activation may be beneficial.
Authors: Luis A Ruiz; Pedro P España; Ainhoa Gómez; Amaia Bilbao; Carmen Jaca; Amaia Arámburu; Alberto Capelastegui; Marcos I Restrepo; Rafael Zalacain Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2017-06-20 Impact factor: 3.921
Authors: Mats Warmerdam; Frank Stolwijk; Anjelica Boogert; Meera Sharma; Lisa Tetteroo; Jacinta Lucke; Simon Mooijaart; Annemieke Ansems; Laura Esteve Cuevas; Douwe Rijpsma; Bas de Groot Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-09-25 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: James Malycha; Timothy Bonnici; David A Clifton; Guy Ludbrook; J Duncan Young; Peter J Watkinson Journal: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Date: 2019-05-15 Impact factor: 2.796