Daniel Poehnert1, Mahmoud Abbas2, Lavinia Maegel2, Franziska Sambale3, Antonina Lavrentieva3, Hans-Heinrich Kreipe2, Jürgen Klempnauer4, Markus Winny4. 1. Department of General, Abdominal and Transplantation Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Germany poehnert.daniel@mh-hannover.de. 2. Department of Pathology, Hannover Medical School, Germany. 3. Institute of Technical Chemistry, Leibniz University Hannover, Germany. 4. Department of General, Abdominal and Transplantation Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Germany.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate in vitro cytotoxicity/biocompatibility as well as in vivo tolerability of the novel polysaccharide 4DryField® PH, certified for haemostasis and adhesion prevention. METHODS: In vitro cytotoxicity/viability testing according to ISO EN 10,993 using murine and human tumour cell lines incubated with 4DryField® PH (PlantTec Medical GmbH). Using a rat model the impact of 4DryField® PH on animals viability and in vivo effects were macro- and micropathologically assessed. RESULTS: In vitro testing revealed no cytotoxic effect of 4DryField® PH nor enhancement of viability to tumour cell lines. In vivo viability of rats was unimpaired by 4DryField® PH. Bodyweight loss in animals with abdominal injury plus treatment with 4DryField® PH was in the range of controls and less than in injured rats without treatment. At day 7 after surgery no formation of adhesions, neither macroscopic nor histological remnants nor signs of foreign body reaction were present in animals without injury. In animals with peritoneal injury and 4DryField® PH application, histopathological observation revealed minor residuals of polysaccharide in the depth of wound cavity embedded in a thickened subperitoneal layer; however, with a suggested intact neoperitoneum. The presence of mononuclear cells surrounding polysaccharide particles in varying states of degradation was observable as well. CONCLUSION: 4DryField® PH is not cytotoxic and does not enhance viability of tumour cell lines. High dose of 4DryField® PH of 1.09 g/kg bodyweight is well tolerated and reduces weight loss in animals with peritoneal injury. The biocompatibility of 4DryField® PH can be rated as being excellent.
PURPOSE: To evaluate in vitro cytotoxicity/biocompatibility as well as in vivo tolerability of the novel polysaccharide 4DryField® PH, certified for haemostasis and adhesion prevention. METHODS: In vitro cytotoxicity/viability testing according to ISO EN 10,993 using murine and humantumour cell lines incubated with 4DryField® PH (PlantTec Medical GmbH). Using a rat model the impact of 4DryField® PH on animals viability and in vivo effects were macro- and micropathologically assessed. RESULTS: In vitro testing revealed no cytotoxic effect of 4DryField® PH nor enhancement of viability to tumour cell lines. In vivo viability of rats was unimpaired by 4DryField® PH. Bodyweight loss in animals with abdominal injury plus treatment with 4DryField® PH was in the range of controls and less than in injured rats without treatment. At day 7 after surgery no formation of adhesions, neither macroscopic nor histological remnants nor signs of foreign body reaction were present in animals without injury. In animals with peritoneal injury and 4DryField® PH application, histopathological observation revealed minor residuals of polysaccharide in the depth of wound cavity embedded in a thickened subperitoneal layer; however, with a suggested intact neoperitoneum. The presence of mononuclear cells surrounding polysaccharide particles in varying states of degradation was observable as well. CONCLUSION: 4DryField® PH is not cytotoxic and does not enhance viability of tumour cell lines. High dose of 4DryField® PH of 1.09 g/kg bodyweight is well tolerated and reduces weight loss in animals with peritoneal injury. The biocompatibility of 4DryField® PH can be rated as being excellent.
Authors: Nicole Ziegler; Matthias Korell; Anja Herrmann; Maya Sophie de Wilde; Luz Angela Torres-de la Roche; Angelika Larbig; Rudy Leon De Wilde Journal: J Med Case Rep Date: 2016-09-06
Authors: Bernhard Krämer; Jürgen Andress; Felix Neis; Sascha Hoffmann; Sara Brucker; Stefan Kommoss; Alice Höller Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Date: 2021-05-26 Impact factor: 3.445