Literature DB >> 26116011

The effect of antireflux surgery on laryngeal symptoms, findings and voice parameters.

Mustafa Sahin1, Rukiye Vardar2, Sinan Ersin3, Tayfun Kirazli4, M Fatih Ogut4, N Serdar Akyildiz4, Serhat Bor2.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of laparoscopic antireflux surgery (LARS) on the laryngeal symptoms, physical findings and voice parameters of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) patients with or without laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR). Forty-one GERD patients predominantly with LPR symptoms (Group I) and twenty-six GERD patients without LPR symptoms (Group II) who had LARS were prospectively analysed before and 2 years after the surgery. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, 24-h ambulatory pH or MII-pH monitoring was performed in all cases. A reflux study group including specialists from five departments in a university hospital decided surgical indications. Patients were asked to fill out a validated LPR and voice quality questionnaire (Reflux Symptom Index and Voice Handicap Index-10). Laryngeal findings were evaluated and scored using a laryngoscopic grading scale [Reflux Finding Score (RFS)], by four blinded ENT specialists. GRBAS scale was done by a blinded otolaryngologist. Voice parameters were measured objectively via the Multi Dimensional Voice Programme (MDVP). The mean age was 45.8 ± 8.5 for Group I (24 men) and 48.9 ± 12.3 for Group II (16 men). The mean follow-up after LARS was 24.5 ± 1.3 months for Group I and 25.2 ± 1.1 months for Group II. The preoperative mean score of RSI was 22.8 ± 7.4 vs. 11.2 ± 6.6; RFS was 10.6 ± 2.3 vs. 5.7 ± 2.5 and VHI was 18.07 ± 4.4 vs. 10.86 ± 3.3 for Group I and II, respectively. The postoperative mean score of RSI was 12.9 ± 6.4 vs. 8.4 ± 4.5; RFS was 6.9 ± 2.0 vs. 4.5 ± 2.3 and VHI was 9.59 ± 4.4 vs. 7.95 ± 3.5 for Group I and II, respectively. Group I had significantly lower RSI and RFS scores following LARS compared to the preoperative scores. LARS successfully improved RFS, RSI and VHI in carefully selected patients with GERD, especially the signs and symptoms related to the larynx and voice. Although the indications for LARS are limited in patients with LPR symptoms, these results favor the decision-making period of LARS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gastroesophageal reflux; Laryngopharyngeal reflux; Nissen fundoplication; Voice

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26116011     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-015-3657-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  35 in total

1.  Does knowledge of medical diagnosis bias auditory-perceptual judgments of dysphonia?

Authors:  Tanya Eadie; Alicia Sroka; Derek R Wright; Albert Merati
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 2.009

2.  [Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Voice Handicap Index].

Authors:  Mehmet Akif Kiliç; Erdoğan Okur; Ilhami Yildirim; Fatih Oğüt; Ilter Denizoğlu; Ahmet Kizilay; Haldun Oğuz; Tolga Kandoğan; Müzeyyen Doğan; Ozgür Akdoğan; Nural Bekiroğlu; Hüseyin Oztarakçi
Journal:  Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg       Date:  2008 May-Jun

3.  Chronic hoarseness secondary to gastroesophageal reflux disease: documentation with 24-h ambulatory pH monitoring.

Authors:  G J Wiener; J A Koufman; W C Wu; J B Cooper; J E Richter; D O Castell
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 10.864

4.  Results of laparoscopic fundoplication where atypical symptoms coexist with oesophageal reflux.

Authors:  R Y Chen; R J Thomas
Journal:  Aust N Z J Surg       Date:  2000-12

5.  Proton pump inhibitor resistance in the treatment of laryngopharyngeal reflux.

Authors:  M R Amin; G N Postma; P Johnson; N Digges; J A Koufman
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.497

6.  The validity and reliability of the reflux finding score (RFS).

Authors:  P C Belafsky; G N Postma; J A Koufman
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  Gastroesophageal reflux disease in a low-income region in Turkey.

Authors:  Serhat Bor; Aliye Mandiracioglu; Gul Kitapcioglu; Canan Caymaz-Bor; Richard J Gilbert
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 10.864

8.  Omeprazole does not reduce gastroesophageal reflux: new insights using multichannel intraluminal impedance technology.

Authors:  Anand P Tamhankar; Jeffrey H Peters; Giussepe Portale; Chih-Cheng Hsieh; Jeffrey A Hagen; Cedric G Bremner; Tom R DeMeester
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Validity and reliability of the reflux symptom index (RSI).

Authors:  Peter C Belafsky; Gregory N Postma; James A Koufman
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.009

10.  Management of complications after laparoscopic Nissen's fundoplication: a surgeon's perspective.

Authors:  Tarun Singhal; Santosh Balakrishnan; Abdulzahra Hussain; Starlene Grandy-Smith; Andrew Paix; Shamsi El-Hasani
Journal:  Ann Surg Innov Res       Date:  2009-02-04
View more
  2 in total

1.  Reflux and Voice Disorders: Have We Established Causality?

Authors:  G Todd Schneider; Michael F Vaezi; David O Francis
Journal:  Curr Otorhinolaryngol Rep       Date:  2016-07-09

Review 2.  Voice outcomes of laryngopharyngeal reflux treatment: a systematic review of 1483 patients.

Authors:  Jérôme R Lechien; Camille Finck; Pedro Costa de Araujo; Kathy Huet; Véronique Delvaux; Myriam Piccaluga; Bernard Harmegnies; Sven Saussez
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 2.503

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.