Literature DB >> 26115898

Use of multivariate linear regression and support vector regression to predict functional outcome after surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Haydn Hoffman1, Sunghoon I Lee2, Jordan H Garst1, Derek S Lu1, Charles H Li1, Daniel T Nagasawa1, Nima Ghalehsari1, Nima Jahanforouz1, Mehrdad Razaghy1, Marie Espinal1, Amir Ghavamrezaii1, Brian H Paak1, Irene Wu3, Majid Sarrafzadeh4, Daniel C Lu5.   

Abstract

This study introduces the use of multivariate linear regression (MLR) and support vector regression (SVR) models to predict postoperative outcomes in a cohort of patients who underwent surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). Currently, predicting outcomes after surgery for CSM remains a challenge. We recruited patients who had a diagnosis of CSM and required decompressive surgery with or without fusion. Fine motor function was tested preoperatively and postoperatively with a handgrip-based tracking device that has been previously validated, yielding mean absolute accuracy (MAA) results for two tracking tasks (sinusoidal and step). All patients completed Oswestry disability index (ODI) and modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association questionnaires preoperatively and postoperatively. Preoperative data was utilized in MLR and SVR models to predict postoperative ODI. Predictions were compared to the actual ODI scores with the coefficient of determination (R(2)) and mean absolute difference (MAD). From this, 20 patients met the inclusion criteria and completed follow-up at least 3 months after surgery. With the MLR model, a combination of the preoperative ODI score, preoperative MAA (step function), and symptom duration yielded the best prediction of postoperative ODI (R(2)=0.452; MAD=0.0887; p=1.17 × 10(-3)). With the SVR model, a combination of preoperative ODI score, preoperative MAA (sinusoidal function), and symptom duration yielded the best prediction of postoperative ODI (R(2)=0.932; MAD=0.0283; p=5.73 × 10(-12)). The SVR model was more accurate than the MLR model. The SVR can be used preoperatively in risk/benefit analysis and the decision to operate.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical spondylotic myelopathy; Multivariate linear regression; Support vector regression; Surgical outcomes

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26115898      PMCID: PMC4842312          DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2015.04.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Neurosci        ISSN: 0967-5868            Impact factor:   1.961


  35 in total

1.  Support vector machine classification and validation of cancer tissue samples using microarray expression data.

Authors:  T S Furey; N Cristianini; N Duffy; D W Bednarski; M Schummer; D Haussler
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  A novel approach for accurate prediction of spontaneous passage of ureteral stones: support vector machines.

Authors:  F Dal Moro; A Abate; G R G Lanckriet; G Arandjelovic; P Gasparella; P Bassi; M Mancini; F Pagano
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 10.612

Review 3.  Predicting disability in stroke--a critical review of the literature.

Authors:  G Kwakkel; R C Wagenaar; B J Kollen; G J Lankhorst
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 10.668

4.  Predicting life satisfaction after spinal cord injury in a Canadian sample.

Authors:  M Tonack; S L Hitzig; B C Craven; K A Campbell; K A Boschen; C F McGillivray
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2007-06-19       Impact factor: 2.772

5.  A clinical prediction model to determine outcomes in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy undergoing surgical treatment: data from the prospective, multi-center AOSpine North America study.

Authors:  Lindsay A Tetreault; Branko Kopjar; Alexander Vaccaro; Sangwook Tim Yoon; Paul M Arnold; Eric M Massicotte; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Association of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association score with the Oswestry Disability Index, Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, and short-form 36.

Authors:  Atsushi Fujiwara; Naoki Kobayashi; Kazuhiko Saiki; Tomoaki Kitagawa; Kazuya Tamai; Koichi Saotome
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Cervical laminectomy and dentate ligament section for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  E C Benzel; J Lancon; L Kesterson; T Hadden
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  1991-09

8.  Effect of intramedullary signal changes on the surgical outcome of patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Ashish Suri; Ravinder Pal Singh Chabbra; Veer Singh Mehta; Sailesh Gaikwad; Ram Mohan Pandey
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.166

9.  Hand function and quality of life in children with epidermolysis bullosa.

Authors:  Emily A Eismann; Anne W Lucky; Roger Cornwall
Journal:  Pediatr Dermatol       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 1.588

10.  Clinical results of cervical laminectomy and fusion for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy in 58 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Victor Chang; Daniel C Lu; Haydn Hoffman; Colin Buchanan; Langston T Holly
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2014-04-16
View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Utility of machine learning algorithms in degenerative cervical and lumbar spine disease: a systematic review.

Authors:  Mark E Stephens; Christen M O'Neal; Alison M Westrup; Fauziyya Y Muhammad; Daniel M McKenzie; Andrew H Fagg; Zachary A Smith
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2021-09-07       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 2.  Artificial Intelligence-Driven Prediction Modeling and Decision Making in Spine Surgery Using Hybrid Machine Learning Models.

Authors:  Babak Saravi; Frank Hassel; Sara Ülkümen; Alisia Zink; Veronika Shavlokhova; Sebastien Couillard-Despres; Martin Boeker; Peter Obid; Gernot Michael Lang
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-03-22

3.  Narrative Review of Predictive Analytics of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery.

Authors:  Kurt Lehner; Jeff Ehresman; Zach Pennington; A Karim Ahmed; Daniel Lubelski; Daniel M Sciubba
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-10-09

4.  Artificial Learning and Machine Learning Applications in Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Cesar D Lopez; Venkat Boddapati; Joseph M Lombardi; Nathan J Lee; Justin Mathew; Nicholas C Danford; Rajiv R Iyer; Marc D Dyrszka; Zeeshan M Sardar; Lawrence G Lenke; Ronald A Lehman
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2022-02-28

5.  Rehabilitation of hand function after spinal cord injury using a novel handgrip device: a pilot study.

Authors:  Haydn Hoffman; Tiffany Sierro; Tianyi Niu; Melanie E Sarino; Majid Sarrafzadeh; David McArthur; V Reggie Edgerton; Daniel C Lu
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 5.208

6.  Predictive Modeling of Outcomes After Traumatic and Nontraumatic Spinal Cord Injury Using Machine Learning: Review of Current Progress and Future Directions.

Authors:  Omar Khan; Jetan H Badhiwala; Jamie R F Wilson; Fan Jiang; Allan R Martin; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2019-12-31
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.