Parviz Dolati1, Daniel Eichberg2, John H Wong3, Mayank Goyal3. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. Electronic address: pdolati@bidmc.harvard.edu. 2. Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 3. Department of Neurosurgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this prospective study was to compare a novel dual-energy computed tomographic angiography (DECTA) method for postoperative assessment of clipped brain aneurysms to detect aneurysm remnants and parent artery patency, with catheter-based digital subtraction angiography (DSA). METHODS: Patients who underwent microsurgical cerebral aneurysm repair were prospectively evaluated after surgery by both DECTA and conventional DSA. CTA was performed using a novel dual-energy method with single source and fast kilovoltage switching (Gemstone Spectral Imaging [GSI]). DSA was performed using biplanar cerebral angiography. An experienced neuroradiologist and a neurosurgeon, both blinded to the original radiologic results, reviewed the images. RESULTS: On DSA, 8 of 15 aneurysms (53%) had a remnant after clipping. All of these remnants were <2 mm except for 1. The only residual aneurysm >2 mm was clearly detected by GSI CTA. Of those 7 DSA-confirmed <2-mm remnants, 5 were detected by GSI CTA. Metal artifacts compromised the image quality in 2 patients. The sensitivity and specificity of GSI CTA for remnant aneurysm <2-mm detection in single clip-treated patients were 100%. In all patients, these were 71.4 % and 100%, respectively. GSI CTA was 100% sensitive and 77% specific to detect parent vessel compromise, with associated positive and negative predictive values of 60% and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: DECTA is a promising noninvasive alternative to conventional catheter-based angiography for identification of aneurysm remnants and assessment of adjacent arteries after surgical clipping of brain aneurysms treated by 2 or fewer clips. It allows for a more rapid image acquisition than DSA, is more cost effective, and is widely available at clinical centers.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this prospective study was to compare a novel dual-energy computed tomographic angiography (DECTA) method for postoperative assessment of clipped brain aneurysms to detect aneurysm remnants and parent artery patency, with catheter-based digital subtraction angiography (DSA). METHODS:Patients who underwent microsurgical cerebral aneurysm repair were prospectively evaluated after surgery by both DECTA and conventional DSA. CTA was performed using a novel dual-energy method with single source and fast kilovoltage switching (Gemstone Spectral Imaging [GSI]). DSA was performed using biplanar cerebral angiography. An experienced neuroradiologist and a neurosurgeon, both blinded to the original radiologic results, reviewed the images. RESULTS: On DSA, 8 of 15 aneurysms (53%) had a remnant after clipping. All of these remnants were <2 mm except for 1. The only residual aneurysm >2 mm was clearly detected by GSI CTA. Of those 7 DSA-confirmed <2-mm remnants, 5 were detected by GSI CTA. Metal artifacts compromised the image quality in 2 patients. The sensitivity and specificity of GSI CTA for remnant aneurysm <2-mm detection in single clip-treated patients were 100%. In all patients, these were 71.4 % and 100%, respectively. GSI CTA was 100% sensitive and 77% specific to detect parent vessel compromise, with associated positive and negative predictive values of 60% and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS:DECTA is a promising noninvasive alternative to conventional catheter-based angiography for identification of aneurysm remnants and assessment of adjacent arteries after surgical clipping of brain aneurysms treated by 2 or fewer clips. It allows for a more rapid image acquisition than DSA, is more cost effective, and is widely available at clinical centers.
Authors: Aikaterini Fitsiori; Steve Philippe Martin; Alix Juillet De Saint Lager; Joanna Gariani; Karl-Olof Lovblad; Xavier Montet; Maria Isabel Vargas Journal: Clin Neuroradiol Date: 2018-06-19 Impact factor: 3.649
Authors: Su Young Yun; Young Jin Heo; Hae Woong Jeong; Jin Wook Baek; Hye Jung Choo; Gi Won Shin; Sung Tae Kim; Young Gyun Jeong; Ji Young Lee; Hyun Seok Jung Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2019-01-25 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: Vincent Dunet; Martine Bernasconi; Steven David Hajdu; Reto Antoine Meuli; Roy Thomas Daniel; Jean-Baptiste Zerlauth Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2017-07-27 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: Hye Jeong Kim; Dae Young Yoon; Eun Soo Kim; Eun Joo Yun; Hong Jun Jeon; Jong Young Lee; Byung-Moon Cho Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2019-12-16 Impact factor: 5.315