Literature DB >> 26115257

Genomic prediction for tick resistance in Braford and Hereford cattle.

F F Cardoso, C C G Gomes, B P Sollero, M M Oliveira, V M Roso, M L Piccoli, R H Higa, M J Yokoo, A R Caetano, I Aguilar.   

Abstract

One of the main animal health problems in tropical and subtropical cattle production is the bovine tick, which causes decreased performance, hide devaluation, increased production costs with acaricide treatments, and transmission of infectious diseases. This study investigated the utility of genomic prediction as a tool to select Braford (BO) and Hereford (HH) cattle resistant to ticks. The accuracy and bias of different methods for direct and blended genomic prediction was assessed using 10,673 tick counts obtained from 3,435 BO and 928 HH cattle belonging to the Delta G Connection breeding program. A subset of 2,803 BO and 652 HH samples were genotyped and 41,045 markers remained after quality control. Log transformed records were adjusted by a pedigree repeatability model to estimate variance components, genetic parameters, and breeding values (EBV) and subsequently used to obtain deregressed EBV. Estimated heritability and repeatability for tick counts were 0.19 ± 0.03 and 0.29 ± 0.01, respectively. Data were split into 5 subsets using k-means and random clustering for cross-validation of genomic predictions. Depending on the method, direct genomic value (DGV) prediction accuracies ranged from 0.35 with Bayes least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) to 0.39 with BayesB for k-means clustering and between 0.42 with BayesLASSO and 0.45 with BayesC for random clustering. All genomic methods were superior to pedigree BLUP (PBLUP) accuracies of 0.26 for k-means and 0.29 for random groups, with highest accuracy gains obtained with BayesB (39%) for k-means and BayesC (55%) for random groups. Blending of historical phenotypic and pedigree information by different methods further increased DGV accuracies by values between 0.03 and 0.05 for direct prediction methods. However, highest accuracy was observed with single-step genomic BLUP with values of 0.48 for -means and 0.56, which represent, respectively, 84 and 93% improvement over PBLUP. Observed random clustering cross-validation breed-specific accuracies ranged between 0.29 and 0.36 for HH and between 0.55 and 0.61 for BO, depending on the blending method. These moderately high values for BO demonstrate that genomic predictions could be used as a practical tool to improve genetic resistance to ticks and in the development of resistant lines of this breed. For HH, accuracies are still in the low to moderate side and this breed training population needs to be increased before genomic selection could be reliably applied to improve tick resistance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26115257     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2014-8832

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  16 in total

1.  The impact of reducing the frequency of animals genotyped at higher density on imputation and prediction accuracies using ssGBLUP1.

Authors:  Bruna P Sollero; Jeremy T Howard; Matthew L Spangler
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Genomic prediction using different estimation methodology, blending and cross-validation techniques for growth traits and visual scores in Hereford and Braford cattle.

Authors:  Gabriel Soares Campos; Fernando Antônio Reimann; Leandro Lunardini Cardoso; Carlos Eduardo Ranquetat Ferreira; Vinicius Silva Junqueira; Patricia Iana Schmidt; José Braccini Neto; Marcos Jun Iti Yokoo; Bruna Pena Sollero; Arione Augusti Boligon; Fernando Flores Cardoso
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Genotype by environment interaction for tick resistance of Hereford and Braford beef cattle using reaction norm models.

Authors:  Rodrigo R Mota; Robert J Tempelman; Paulo S Lopes; Ignacio Aguilar; Fabyano F Silva; Fernando F Cardoso
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 4.297

Review 4.  Cattle Tick Rhipicephalus microplus-Host Interface: A Review of Resistant and Susceptible Host Responses.

Authors:  Ala E Tabor; Abid Ali; Gauhar Rehman; Gustavo Rocha Garcia; Amanda Fonseca Zangirolamo; Thiago Malardo; Nicholas N Jonsson
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 5.293

5.  Genetic parameters for tick counts across months for different tick species and anatomical locations in South African Nguni cattle.

Authors:  N O Mapholi; A Maiwashe; O Matika; V Riggio; C Banga; M D MacNeil; V Muchenje; K Nephawe; K Dzama
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2017-07-08       Impact factor: 1.559

6.  Tag SNP selection for prediction of tick resistance in Brazilian Braford and Hereford cattle breeds using Bayesian methods.

Authors:  Bruna P Sollero; Vinícius S Junqueira; Cláudia C G Gomes; Alexandre R Caetano; Fernando F Cardoso
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 4.297

7.  Multiple Country and Breed Genomic Prediction of Tick Resistance in Beef Cattle.

Authors:  Fernando Flores Cardoso; Oswald Matika; Appolinaire Djikeng; Ntanganedzeni Mapholi; Heather M Burrow; Marcos Jun Iti Yokoo; Gabriel Soares Campos; Claudia Cristina Gulias-Gomes; Valentina Riggio; Ricardo Pong-Wong; Bailey Engle; Laercio Porto-Neto; Azwihangwisi Maiwashe; Ben J Hayes
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 7.561

8.  Linkage disequilibrium, persistence of phase and effective population size estimates in Hereford and Braford cattle.

Authors:  Patrícia Biegelmeyer; Claudia C Gulias-Gomes; Alexandre R Caetano; Juan P Steibel; Fernando F Cardoso
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 2.797

9.  Comparative Hemolymph Proteomic and Enzymatic Analyses of Two Strains of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus Ticks Resistant and Susceptible to Ixodicides.

Authors:  H Aguilar-Díaz; M Esquivel-Velázquez; R E Quiroz-Castañeda; E Miranda-Miranda; R J P Conde-Baeye; M Cobaxín-Cárdenas; P Ostoa-Saloma; R Cossío-Bayúgar
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Bias and accuracy of dairy sheep evaluations using BLUP and SSGBLUP with metafounders and unknown parent groups.

Authors:  Fernando L Macedo; Ole F Christensen; Jean-Michel Astruc; Ignacio Aguilar; Yutaka Masuda; Andrés Legarra
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 4.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.