Literature DB >> 26115093

The Microbiota and Abundance of the Class 1 Integron-Integrase Gene in Tropical Sewage Treatment Plant Influent and Activated Sludge.

Magna C Paiva1, Marcelo P Ávila2, Mariana P Reis2, Patrícia S Costa2, Regina M D Nardi3, Andréa M A Nascimento2.   

Abstract

Bacteria are assumed to efficiently remove organic pollutants from sewage in sewage treatment plants, where antibiotic-resistance genes can move between species via mobile genetic elements known as integrons. Nevertheless, few studies have addressed bacterial diversity and class 1 integron abundance in tropical sewage. Here, we describe the extant microbiota, using V6 tag sequencing, and quantify the class 1 integron-integrase gene (intI1) in raw sewage (RS) and activated sludge (AS). The analysis of 1,174,486 quality-filtered reads obtained from RS and AS samples revealed complex and distinct bacterial diversity in these samples. The RS sample, with 3,074 operational taxonomic units, exhibited the highest alpha-diversity indices. Among the 25 phyla, Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes represented 85% (AS) and 92% (RS) of all reads. Increased relative abundance of Micrococcales, Myxococcales, and Sphingobacteriales and reduced pathogen abundance were noted in AS. At the genus level, differences were observed for the dominant genera Simplicispira and Diaphorobacter (AS) as well as for Enhydrobacter (RS). The activated sludge process decreased (55%) the amount of bacteria harboring the intI1 gene in the RS sample. Altogether, our results emphasize the importance of biological treatment for diminishing pathogenic bacteria and those bearing the intI1 gene that arrive at a sewage treatment plant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26115093      PMCID: PMC4482650          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131532

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Although water is fundamental to life on earth and is considered a renewable and infinite resource, it is still limited. Wastage, environmental imbalances and water pollution due to domestic and industrial sewage threaten the availability of this natural resource, which is in high demand. The contemporary world has contributed to environmental pollution by releasing large amounts of sewage into waterways, leading to human exposure and the contamination of several environments. In Brazil, approximately 8 billion liters of non-treated sewage is released into rivers each day from one hundred of the largest Brazilian cities [1]. This represents a environmental challenge because the discharge of untreated or improperly treated waste into waterways can introduce potentially pathogenic microorganisms to humans and change the indigenous microbial community, with ecological and public health implications [2]. Notably, the aquatic environment harbors different antibiotic resistance-associated mobile genes that are scattered among environmental bacteria [3]. As outlined in a review by Gillings et al. [4], class 1 integron-integrase is consistently linked to genes that confer resistance to antibiotics, disinfectants and heavy metals, is found in pathogenic and commensal bacterial species of humans and animals and is able to move between species. Wastewater discharge, manure disposal and aquaculture are the main sources of antibiotics in aquatic environments [5]. Previous studies have agreed that the microbiota of wild animals can acquire antibiotic resistance genes by consuming waste or drinking contaminated water [6, 7]. Efforts to treat sewage are occurring worldwide. Among these processes, aerobic biological treatment by activated sludge (AS) has been successfully applied and widely accepted for treating domestic sewage. This system represents an environmental protection and offers a low-cost and effective way to treat sewage [8], with the removal of over 90% of organic material [9, 10]. However, the efficacy of this treatment depends on a series of metabolic interactions among diverse microorganisms, mostly bacteria, that play a key role to remove organic and inorganic pollutants. Many studies based on 16S rRNA gene analysis have described microbial groups found in anaerobic reactors and AS [11-13], but less is known regarding microbiota from raw sewage (RS) and the abundance of the class 1 integron-integrase gene (intI1) in this environment. Knowledge on this microbiota is important because it may identify bacteria that can harm human health. Additionally, the distribution of class 1 integrons from metagenomic samples, in contrast to culturable bacteria, remains under-explored. Thus, evaluating the abundance of class 1 integrons, which are often associated with multiresistant clinical pathogens, is important [14, 7]. To gain insight into this knowledge gap, we investigated the bacterial diversity of RS and AS of a full-scale activated sludge system using high-throughput sequencing. Moreover, we also investigated the abundance of the 16S rRNA and intI1 genes in these environments using real-time PCR.

Materials and Methods

Ethics statement

For sampling in the Arrudas wastewater treatment plant, no specific permit was required for the described study area and we confirm that it did not involve endangered or protected species.

Study area and sampling

The Arrudas wastewater treatment plant, Belo Horizonte, Brazil (19°53’42”S and 43°52’42”W) occupies an area of 63.84 ha, and treats the domestic sewage (2.25 m3/s design flow) generated by 1 million inhabitants using a conventional activated sludge process. Samples from sewage and wastewater treatment station represent a combination of inputs from human faecal microbes and enrichment of specific microbes from the environment to form a unique and stable population structure [15]. RS (10 L) and AS (2 L) samples were placed in sterilized bottles on 7 May 2013 and transported on ice to the laboratory within 2 h. The AS sample corresponded to a mixed liquid containing flocs and suspended bacteria from the aerobic zone of the aeration tank. The samples were then centrifuged at 14,000x g for 10 min, and the supernatants were discharged and the final pellets were stored at -20°C until further processing.

DNA extraction and sequencing

Total DNA was extracted from 10 g of wet pellets stored at -20°C after thawing at room temperature, using the PowerSoil DNA Isolation Kit (Mobio Laboratories Inc., Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The quantity and quality of the total DNA were determined using a NanoDrop spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies). Partial amplification of the 16S rRNA gene was achieved using the primer set 985F (5’-CAACGCGAAGAACCTTAC C-3’) and 1046R (5’-CGACAGCCATGCANCACCT-3’) [16], which corresponded to the V6 hypervariable region. Gene amplification and sequencing were performed at the Beijing Genomics Institute (BGI), using the 100 bp paired-end strategy on the Illumina HiSeq 2000 platform.

Data analysis and taxonomic assignment

In this study, reads assembly, trimming and screening were carried out using Mothur v.1.32.0 [17]. Sequences with low quality (≤20) or ambiguous bases and with more than eight homopolymers and a read length outside the range of 56–63 bp were discarded. Reads approved using these quality criteria were aligned and classified against a V6 region trimmed alignment that was based on the Silva v.119 16S rRNA database [18]. Chimeric reads were identified and excluded using the Uchime method [19], and mitochondrial and chloroplast reads and reads that did not match any reference sequence from the bacterial 16S rRNA database were discarded. Subsequently, the reads were grouped into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) by considering a genetic similarity of 95% using the average neighbor method. The samples were normalized to the lowest number of reads using the command rarefy_even_depth with the Phyloseq [20] package of the R software [21] to determine the alpha diversity indices. The nucleotide sequences were submitted to Sequence Read Archive (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/) with the accession numbers of SRR 1801880 to SRR 1801935.

Quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR)

For each RS and AS sample, we estimated the abundance of the bacterial 16S rRNA and intI1 genes using an ABI PRISM 7900HT sequence detection system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). The primer sets 338F (5’-TACGGGAGGCAGCAG-3’) [22] and 518R (5’-ATTACCGCGGCTGCTGG-3’) [23] and qINT-3 (5’-TGCCGTGATCGAAATCCAGATCCT-3’) and qINT-4 (5’-TTTCTGGAAGGCGAGCATCGTTTG-3’) [24] were used to amplify the 16S rRNA and intI1 genes, respectively. The amplification reaction conditions were described by Reis et al. [25] and Rosewarne et al. [24], respectively. Standard curves were generated using seven dilutions, in triplicate, of the 16S rRNA and intI amplicons from the Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 (3.82 x 1011 copies/μL) and E. coli BH100 strains (3.20 x 1012 copies/μL). To determine the number of the 16S rRNA and intl1 genes copies used as templates for the standard curves, the following online calculator was accessed: http://www.uri.edu/research/gsc/resources/cndna.html [26]. Each sample was run in triplicate, and a negative control was included for each analysis. The standard curves for the primer sets generated slopes of -3.19 and -3.27, respectively, and the R values were greater than 0.97 for both curves (S1 Fig). Bacterial qPCR exhibited Ct values of 10.7 and 12.50 for RS and AS, respectively. In contrast, the Ct values obtained for intI1 were 16.81 and 19.68 for RS and AS, respectively (S2 Fig). The proportion of bacterial cells harboring the intI1 gene in each sample was estimated as previously described by Hardwick et al. [27].

Results and Discussion

Overview of the datasets and alpha diversity

Illumina-based V6 tag sequencing yielded 1,885,944 raw reads (943,000 in RS and 942,944 in AS, 339.47 Mb). The resultant clean reads (598,119 in RS and 587,243 in AS, with an average length of 61 bp) were used for downstream analysis. There were a total of 3,074 (RS) and 1,952 (AS) OTUs (S1 Table). To estimate the relative diversity captured in each sample, the normalized libraries (with the lowest number of reads, 587,243) were used to calculate the cumulative relative frequency curve, OTU richness, ChaoI and ACE richness estimators, as well as the Shannon and Simpson diversity indices. Good’s coverage values were similar in both samples (RS, 99.85%; AS, 99.9%). As illustrated in Fig 1, the bacterial communities from RS and AS were dominated by a few OTUs. The long tails of the taxon rank distribution curves indicated that the diversity in these environments mostly arose from rare taxa. Although both communities exhibited a high number of rare OTUs, the read distribution of dominant OTUs in each sample was relatively equitable, as shown by the high Simpson index values (RS, 0.93; AS, 0.95). Altogether, Good’s coverage and the cumulative relative frequency curve suggested that most of the diversity was captured. The Shannon index (RS, 3.96; AS, 3.9) revealed considerable bacterial diversity in the samples. Moreover, the Chao1 (RS, 3677.6; AS, 2346.2) and ACE (RS, 3843.4; AS, 2441.0) values also predicted higher bacterial diversity in the RS sample (S2 Table).
Fig 1

Cumulative relative frequency of the OTUs of raw sewage (RS) and activated sludge (AS).

Taxonomic composition

The taxonomic diversity profile by V6 tag sequencing is shown in Fig 2 and S3 Table. The 1,174,486 reads were affiliated with 25 bacterial phyla. Additionally, 1,025 OTUs were considered to be unclassified at the phylum level and thus might represent new bacterial taxa. Importantly, three phyla (Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes) accounted for 97% and 85% all of the reads in the RS and AS samples, respectively. Although the RS and AS samples revealed similar phylum-level representation, distinct distributions were observed. Previous studies of microbial sewage and activated sludge communities also revealed a predominance of these phyla [8, 11, 15]; however, they showed a lower proportion of Proteobacteria (36%-65%) than that observed in our study. In contrast to our observations, Firmicutes was previously found in low abundance in the RS [8] and in high abundance in the AS [28]. Moreover, the abundance of Bacteroidetes ranged from 2.7% to 15.6% in activated sludge samples from 14 sewage treatment plants [11]. This difference between our data and those of previous studies can be due to differences in sewage composition because of climatic, geographical and population conditions [12, 29] as well as because of organic loading, pH, temperature, dissolved oxygen and sludge retention time applied in the aeration tank [12, 30].
Fig 2

Distribution of the community members in raw sewage (RS) and activated sludge (AS).

AVA group: Actinobacteria, Verrucomicrobia, Acidobacteria. Other phyla: BD1-5, Candidate_division_OD1, Candidate_division_OP11, Candidate_division_OP8, Candidate_division_TM7, Candidate_division_WS3, Candidate_division_WS6, Chlamydiae, Chlorobi, Cyanobacteria, Elusimicrobia, Fusobacteria, Gemmatimonadetes, Lentisphaerae, Nitrospirae, SHA-109, Spirochaetae, Tenericutes.

The compositions of the bacterial communities were distinct and represented by broad intra-phylum diversity. A total of 147 (127 from RS and 113 from AS) families comprising 307 (282 from RS and 207 from AS) genera were identified in both environments. Proteobacteria, especially Beta- and Gammaproteobacteria, were the dominant community members (Fig 2). Comamonadaceae (12.6% from RS and 12.4% from AS) and Pseudomonadales (12.4% from RS and 4.9% from AS) were the predominant taxa in both samples, covering 42.2% of all reads. Betaproteobacteria constitute a major fraction of the microbial community in the activated sludge of domestic sewage treatment plants [31-33], suggesting that their physiological characteristics are functionally relevant for this ecosystem. Moreover, members of the Comamonadaceae family, which play an important role in nutrient removal, were among the most dominant taxa in wastewater treatment systems [15, 32]. Here, two dominant genera, Simplicispira and Diaphorobacter, were found in AS; these genera have been recovered from activated sludge systems and comprise denitrifying bacteria [34].

Distribution of the community members in raw sewage (RS) and activated sludge (AS).

AVA group: Actinobacteria, Verrucomicrobia, Acidobacteria. Other phyla: BD1-5, Candidate_division_OD1, Candidate_division_OP11, Candidate_division_OP8, Candidate_division_TM7, Candidate_division_WS3, Candidate_division_WS6, Chlamydiae, Chlorobi, Cyanobacteria, Elusimicrobia, Fusobacteria, Gemmatimonadetes, Lentisphaerae, Nitrospirae, SHA-109, Spirochaetae, Tenericutes. Within the Gammaproteobacteria class changes in the bacterial community composition between the samples were observed. Interestingly, considerable enrichment of an OTU (Otu00002) classified only at the Pseudomonadales order level was found in AS (Table 1). Thus, this taxon likely has an ecologically significant role in reducing environmental pollution in wastewater treatment plants. Moreover, the Enhydrobacter genus was overrepresented in the RS sample, but information on Enhydrobacter is scarce and comprises that of only one species (Enhydrobacter aerosaccus) [35] found in primary influent sewage samples [36].
Table 1

The top 21 OTUs classified in raw sewage (RS) and activated sludge (AS); (-) unclassified.

OTUPhylumClassOrderFamilyGenusNumber of reads RSNumber of reads AS
Otu00029AcidobacteriaHolophagaeHolophagalesHolophagaceae Geothrix 08025
Otu00024ActinobacteriaActinobacteriaMicrococcalesIntrasporangiaceae3710356
Otu00006BacteroidetesSphingobacteriiaSphingobacterialesChitinophagaceae035350
Otu00013NS11-12marine group019713
Otu00021Chitinophagaceae011502
Otu00022FlavobacteriiaFlavobacterialesFlavobacteriaceae Cloacibacterium 88491912
Otu00012FirmicutesBacilliLactobacillalesStreptococcaceae Streptococcus 21360315
Otu0001712806106
Otu00001ProteobacteriaBetaproteobacteriaBurkholderialesComamonadaceae12119684732
Otu00002GammaproteobacteriaPseudomonadales853118
Otu00003Moraxellaceae Enhydrobacter 45770727
Otu00004Deltaproteobacteria046424
Otu00005GammaproteobacteriaPseudomonadalesMoraxellaceae Acinetobacter 406361607
Otu00007303972027
Otu00008BetaproteobacteriaBurkholderialesComamonadaceae272024761
Otu00009523976
Otu00010Gammaproteobacteria203292325
Otu00011PseudomonadalesMoraxellaceae Enhydrobacter 21462257
Otu00014BetaproteobacteriaNeisserialesNeisseriaceae Neisseria 16592398
Otu00015Gammaproteobacteria16384300
Otu00016DeltaproteobacteriaMyxococcalesPolyangiaceae Sorangium 014549
The Alpha- and Deltaproteobacteria classes were found at very low abundances in RS (0.4% and 0. 8%, respectively), whereas they were enriched in AS (2.9% and 12.7%, respectively). Among the 10 most abundant alpha- and deltaproteobacterial OTUs, the Caulobacteraceae family (Alphaproteobacteria) and the Myxococcales (Deltaproteobacteria) order were identified. The presence of Caulobacter species in AS is intriguing because these organisms are typically found in water and are considered to be oligotrophic (i.e., adapted to conditions with low nutrient availability) [37, 38]. Myxobacteria are known to be micropredators [39, 40] that are highly effective at degrading organic matter and are found in various habitats but mostly on decaying organic material [37]. The abundance of Firmicutes in AS was significantly lower (0.6%) than in RS (20%), whereas the abundance of Bacteroidetes was greater in AS (19%) than in RS (2%). Previous studies have suggested that Firmicutes species do not thrive in intense aeration conditions, e.g. in activated sludge [8, 41]. The majority of Bacteroidetes were represented by the Flavobacteriales (RS) and Sphingobacteriales (AS) orders, the latter of which are widely abundant in AS plants and metabolize macromolecules such as polysaccharides and proteins [42]. Actinobacteria, Acidobacteria and Verrucomicrobia were the minor phyla and were found mostly in the AS sample. Notably, however, three of the 30 top OTUs of all of the phyla were assigned to the Intrasporangiaceae family (Actinobacteria) and the Geothrix (Acidobacteria) and Prosthecobacter (Verrucomicrobia) genera. Interestingly, Intrasporangiaceae and Geothrix harbor species that accumulate polyphosphates [43] and that participate in the biogeochemical recycling of metals [44], respectively. The genus Prosthecobacter has been recovered from activated sludge and can use algal metabolites as carbon and nutrient sources [45, 46]. Interestingly, we found a few pathogen-related OTUs. Among the top 21 OTUs classified at the genus level, Neisseria, Acinetobacter and Streptococcus, which are known to be harmful to humans, were detected (Table 1). Additionally, it should be noted that a significant reduction in the abundance of these potential pathogens in AS was observed, suggesting that the conditions of the activated sludge tank are unfavorable for pathogens. Pathogens that are a risk to public health have been previously identified in wastewater treatment plants. In particular, Leptospira, Mycobacterium and Vibrio have been frequently recovered from waste of wastewater treatment plants [12, 47]. Although enteric pathogens are consistently retrieved from sewage using culture-based approaches, OTUs related to Escherichia-Shigella were found at very low abundance (0.15% from RS and 0.001% from AS). The core microbiota was determined using a Venn diagram (Fig 3). A total of 849 OTUs were shared by the two communities, resulting in an overlap of 20.3% of all OTUs. Common OTUs with more than 100 reads were assigned to the Proteobacteria (37 OTUs), Firmicutes (5 OTUs), Bacteroidetes (2 OTUs), Actinobacteria, and Fusobacteria (one OTU each) phyla, comprising 75.6% (RS) and 26.1% (AS) of the reads of these OTUs. Among the core community, the Comamonadaceae, Neisseriaceae, Rhodocyclaceae, Moraxellaceae, Xanthomonadaceae and Aeromonadaceae families were shared by the samples. Moreover, the Acinetobacter, Neisseria, Enhydrobacter, Dechloromonas, Tolumonas and Candidatus Accumulibacter genera were overrepresented in RS. In contrast, most OTUs were only detected in a particular bacterial community. These unique OTUs were largely dominant (72.3%) in relation to the total OTUs in the RS sample but were less important in relation to the relative abundance (2.5%, only 14,638 reads), which is in contrast to the AS sample (43.1%, 253,406 reads). Thus, changes in the community composition between these samples originated from rare OTUs, whereas the core microbiota included strikingly more abundant OTUs.
Fig 3

Venn diagram showing the exclusive and shared OTUs from raw sewage (RS) and activated sludge (AS).

* % of all OTUs, ** % of all the reads.

Venn diagram showing the exclusive and shared OTUs from raw sewage (RS) and activated sludge (AS).

* % of all OTUs, ** % of all the reads.

Quantitative analysis of the bacterial communities and the intl1 gene

Molecular tools such as quantitative PCR can effectively measure the amount of bacteria and specific genes, including non-dominant bacteria in various environmental samples [48]. In contrast to studies on environmental samples, many studies in clinical settings have investigated the abundance of class 1 integrons using metagenomic approaches. Sewage and wastewater treatment plants are considered significant sources of resistance genes and mobile elements [49-51]; therefore, these environments are hotspots for the environmental spread of antibiotic resistance mediated by class 1 integrons. Here, the 16S rRNA and intI1 gene copy numbers of each sample were quantified using qPCR to estimate the proportion of bacteria harboring class 1 integrons. The bacterial load in the AS sample was higher (2.64 x 108 copies/L) than that in the RS sample (1.23 x 108 copies/L). Moreover, the intI1 gene copies number per L was 6.54 x 107 in RS and 6.3 x 107 in AS. Thus, the proportion of bacterial cells containing a class 1 integron differed between the samples (RS, 53%; AS, 24%); similar to the results of other studies [50, 52]. Consistent with previous findings [52], we also observed the high removal of bacteria carrying class 1 integrons (55%) after the activated sludge process, suggesting that this process is effective in removing bacteria containing class 1 integrons. Interestingly, an increase in the abundance of the intI1 gene during the wastewater treatment process has been reported in some studies [53, 54]. The variation of results observed among studies may be attributed to selected bacterial taxa, the climatic and population conditions, occurrence of rain events before sampling as well as organic loading, pH, temperature, dissolved oxygen and sludge retention time applied in the aeration tank. This high removal was accompanied by a decrease in the relative abundance (61%) of Gammaproteobacteria in AS, which could be a consequence of this group’s association with the intI1 gene. Indeed, it has been suggested that class 1 integrons are broadly distributed throughout Proteobacteria [55]. Our study provides comprehensive insight into the complex bacterial community composition that is associated with sewage treatment plant influent and activated sludge. V6 tag sequencing uncovered not only the dominant taxa but many rare members. Despite the broad taxonomic diversity, only 22.8% of the detected reads were required to explain the differences in community structure between RS and AS. The RS and AS communities were dominated by several taxa that accounted for a large number of reads, and the groups that were found were consistent with those found in all wastewater treatment plant and sewage studies. However, the profiles of the potential pathogens greatly differed among these studies. Our results suggest that class 1 integrons are important outside of the context of Enterobacteriaceae.

Standard curves for the 16S rRNA (A) and intI1 (B) genes.

(TIF) Click here for additional data file.

The Ct values of the 16S rRNA (A) and intI1 (B) genes.

(TIF) Click here for additional data file.

Summary of the dataset quality control from the raw sewage (RS) and activated sludge (AS) libraries.

(DOCX) Click here for additional data file.

General features of the raw sewage (RS) and activated sludge (AS) libraries.

(DOCX) Click here for additional data file.

Taxonomic affiliation of 16S rRNA gene OTUs based on Silva database.

(XLSX) Click here for additional data file.
  44 in total

1.  Microbial community structure in activated sludge floc analysed by fluorescence in situ hybridization and its relation to floc stability.

Authors:  Britt-Marie Wilén; Motoharu Onuki; Malte Hermansson; Doug Lumley; Takashi Mino
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2007-12-23       Impact factor: 11.236

2.  Organic loading rate and food-to-microorganism ratio shape prokaryotic diversity in a demo-scale up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor treating domestic wastewater.

Authors:  Juliana Cardinali-Rezende; Juliana C Araújo; Paulo G S Almeida; Carlos A L Chernicharo; José L Sanz; Edmar Chartone-Souza; Andréa M A Nascimento
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 2.271

3.  Seagulls of the Berlengas natural reserve of Portugal as carriers of fecal Escherichia coli harboring CTX-M and TEM extended-spectrum beta-lactamases.

Authors:  Patricia Poeta; Hajer Radhouani; Gilberto Igrejas; Alexandre Gonçalves; Carlos Carvalho; Jorge Rodrigues; Laura Vinué; Sergio Somalo; Carmen Torres
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-10-03       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 4.  The changing epidemiology of resistance.

Authors:  Peter M Hawkey; Annie M Jones
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 5.790

5.  Analysis of the bacterial community in a laboratory-scale nitrification reactor and a wastewater treatment plant by 454-pyrosequencing.

Authors:  Lin Ye; Ming-Fei Shao; Tong Zhang; Amy Hin Yan Tong; Si Lok
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 11.236

6.  Occurrence of class 1 and 2 integrons in resistant Enterobacteriaceae collected from a urban wastewater treatment plant: first report from central Italy.

Authors:  Cristina Pellegrini; Giuseppe Celenza; Bernardetta Segatore; Pierangelo Bellio; Domenico Setacci; Gianfranco Amicosante; Mariagrazia Perilli
Journal:  Microb Drug Resist       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 3.431

7.  Diaphorobacter nitroreducens gen nov, sp nov, a poly(3-hydroxybutyrate)-degrading denitrifying bacterium isolated from activated sludge.

Authors:  Shams Tabrez Khan; Akira Hiraishi
Journal:  J Gen Appl Microbiol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 1.452

8.  Biological filtration limits carbon availability and affects downstream biofilm formation and community structure.

Authors:  Chee Meng Pang; Wen-Tso Liu
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Occurrence of integron-associated resistance gene cassettes located on antibiotic resistance plasmids isolated from a wastewater treatment plant.

Authors:  Thomas Tennstedt; Rafael Szczepanowski; Sebastian Braun; Alfred Pühler; Andreas Schlüter
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol       Date:  2003-08-01       Impact factor: 4.194

Review 10.  Treated wastewater effluent as a source of microbial pollution of surface water resources.

Authors:  Shalinee Naidoo; Ademola O Olaniran
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 3.390

View more
  2 in total

1.  Combined Effects of Soil Biotic and Abiotic Factors, Influenced by Sewage Sludge Incorporation, on the Incidence of Corn Stalk Rot.

Authors:  Raquel Ghini; Nara Lúcia Perondi Fortes; Juan A Navas-Cortés; Carlos Alberto Silva; Wagner Bettiol
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Effectiveness of wastewater treatment systems in removing microbial agents: a systematic review.

Authors:  Zahra Aghalari; Hans-Uwe Dahms; Mika Sillanpää; Juan Eduardo Sosa-Hernandez; Roberto Parra-Saldívar
Journal:  Global Health       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 4.185

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.