Literature DB >> 26114930

Colour polymorphism torn apart by opposing positive frequency-dependent selection, yet maintained in space.

Swanne P Gordon1, Hanna Kokko2, Bibiana Rojas1, Ossi Nokelainen1,3, Johanna Mappes1.   

Abstract

Polymorphic warning signals in aposematic species are enigmatic because predator learning and discrimination should select for the most common coloration, resulting in positive frequency-dependent survival selection. Here, we investigated whether differential mating success could create sufficiently strong negative frequency-dependent selection for rare morphs to explain polymorphic (white and yellow) warning coloration in male wood tiger moths (Parasemia plantaginis). We conducted an experiment in semi-natural conditions where we estimated mating success for both white and yellow male moths under three different morph frequencies. Contrary to expectations, mating success was positively frequency-dependent: white morph males had high relative fitness when common, likewise yellow morph males had high relative fitness when instead they were common. We hence built a model parameterized with our data to examine whether polymorphism can be maintained despite two sources of positive frequency dependence. The model includes known spatial variation in the survival advantage enjoyed by the yellow morph and assumes that relative mating success follows our experimentally derived values. It predicts that polymorphism is possible under migration for up to approximately 20% exchange of individuals between subpopulations in each generation. Our results suggest that differential mating success combined with spatial variation in predator communities may operate as a selection mosaic that prevents complete fixation of either morph.
© 2015 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology © 2015 British Ecological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aposematism; coloration; mating success; modelling; predation; sexual selection; spatial mosaic

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26114930     DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.12416

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  7 in total

1.  How to fight multiple enemies: target-specific chemical defences in an aposematic moth.

Authors:  Bibiana Rojas; Emily Burdfield-Steel; Hannu Pakkanen; Kaisa Suisto; Michael Maczka; Stefan Schulz; Johanna Mappes
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Defense against predators incurs high reproductive costs for the aposematic moth Arctia plantaginis.

Authors:  Carita Lindstedt; Kaisa Suisto; Emily Burdfield-Steel; Anne E Winters; Johanna Mappes
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 2.671

3.  Evidence for morph-specific substrate choice in a green-brown polymorphic grasshopper.

Authors:  Pauline Heinze; Petra Dieker; Hannah M Rowland; Holger Schielzeth
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 2.671

4.  Genetic colour variation visible for predators and conspecifics is concealed from humans in a polymorphic moth.

Authors:  Ossi Nokelainen; Juan A Galarza; Jimi Kirvesoja; Kaisa Suisto; Johanna Mappes
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 2.516

5.  Joint effects of female preference intensity and frequency-dependent predation on the polymorphism maintenance in aposematic sexual traits.

Authors:  Aditya Ponkshe; John A Endler
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-10-11       Impact factor: 3.167

6.  Relative costs and benefits of alternative reproductive phenotypes at different temperatures - genotype-by-environment interactions in a sexually selected trait.

Authors:  Agata Plesnar-Bielak; Anna Maria Skwierzyńska; Kasper Hlebowicz; Jacek Radwan
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 3.260

7.  The impact of life stage and pigment source on the evolution of novel warning signal traits.

Authors:  Carita Lindstedt; Robin K Bagley; Sara Calhim; Mackenzie Jones; Catherine R Linnen
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 4.171

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.