PURPOSE: To report the results of unilateral implantation of a Boston keratoprosthesis (BKPro) in patients with good visual acuity in the fellow eye. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 37 eyes of 37 patients who underwent an optical BKPro and had a preoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 20/40 or better in the fellow eye at Wills Eye Hospital from September 2005 to November 2013 was performed. Patients were excluded if they had less than 1 year of postoperative follow-up. RESULTS: The mean follow-up after BKPro implantation was 31.7 months (range, 12-78 months; SD, 21). Twenty-eight patients underwent a BKPro for failed penetrating keratoplasty, and 9 patients underwent a primary BKPro. The most common complications were elevated intraocular pressure and retroprosthetic membrane formation in 16 eyes (43%) each. The mean final BCVA (1.0 ± 0.8 logMAR; median, 1.0 logMAR) was statistically better than the mean preoperative BCVA (1.8 ± 0.2 logMAR; median, 1.8 logMAR) (P < 0.001). The probability of postoperative BCVA of 20/200 or better was 54.1% with an average 45.1 ± 4.7 (confidence interval: 35.9-54.3) months of follow-up. The probability of postoperative BCVA of 20/40 or better was 37.8% with an average 51.8 ± 4.9 (confidence interval: 42.0-61.5) months of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Half of the patients in our study achieved the minimum visual acuity required for binocular functioning, whereas one-third of the patients achieved a BCVA somewhat similar to that of the contralateral eye. The complications were similar to those reported previously with good retention of the device. BKPro implantation is a reasonable option for patients with good vision in the fellow eye.
PURPOSE: To report the results of unilateral implantation of a Boston keratoprosthesis (BKPro) in patients with good visual acuity in the fellow eye. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 37 eyes of 37 patients who underwent an optical BKPro and had a preoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 20/40 or better in the fellow eye at Wills Eye Hospital from September 2005 to November 2013 was performed. Patients were excluded if they had less than 1 year of postoperative follow-up. RESULTS: The mean follow-up after BKPro implantation was 31.7 months (range, 12-78 months; SD, 21). Twenty-eight patients underwent a BKPro for failed penetrating keratoplasty, and 9 patients underwent a primary BKPro. The most common complications were elevated intraocular pressure and retroprosthetic membrane formation in 16 eyes (43%) each. The mean final BCVA (1.0 ± 0.8 logMAR; median, 1.0 logMAR) was statistically better than the mean preoperative BCVA (1.8 ± 0.2 logMAR; median, 1.8 logMAR) (P < 0.001). The probability of postoperative BCVA of 20/200 or better was 54.1% with an average 45.1 ± 4.7 (confidence interval: 35.9-54.3) months of follow-up. The probability of postoperative BCVA of 20/40 or better was 37.8% with an average 51.8 ± 4.9 (confidence interval: 42.0-61.5) months of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Half of the patients in our study achieved the minimum visual acuity required for binocular functioning, whereas one-third of the patients achieved a BCVA somewhat similar to that of the contralateral eye. The complications were similar to those reported previously with good retention of the device. BKPro implantation is a reasonable option for patients with good vision in the fellow eye.