| Literature DB >> 26113890 |
Abibou Simpore1, Cyrille Bisseye2, Bolni Marius Nagalo3, Mahamoudou Sanou4, Yacoub Nébié5, Laure Stella Ghoma-Linguissi6, Honorine Dahourou5, Boukary Sawadogo7, Florencia Djigma6, Siaka Ouattara5, Virginio Pietra6, Jason Nichol8, Jacques Simpore6.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Due to the existence of a variety of types of non-venereal syphilis caused by the related T. pallidum, regular serological testing such as Rapid Plasma Reagin (RPR) and Chemiluminescent Microparticle Immunoassay Technique (CMIA) are often unable to differentiate venereal syphilis from the non- venereal one, hence, the interest in the use of molecular biology testing for a confirmation diagnosis of syphilis caused by Treponema pallidum subspecies pallidum.Entities:
Keywords: CMIA; PCR; RPR; Treponema pallidum; diagnosis
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 26113890 PMCID: PMC4473781 DOI: 10.11604/pamj.2014.18.56.3850
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pan Afr Med J
Show the socio-demographic characteristics of VNRBD
| Characteristics | N (%) | Type of donors | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| First-time donors | Repeat donors | |||
| Gender | Female | 46 (19. 0%) | 39 (84.8%) | 7 (15.2%) |
| Male | 196 (81. 0%) | 134 (68.4%) | 62 (31.6%) | |
| Years | 17-20 | 41 (16.9%) | 31 (75.6%) | 10 (24.4%) |
| 21-30 | 149 (61.6%) | 101 (67.8%) | 48 (32.2%) | |
| 31-40 | 29 (12.0%) | 23 (79.3%) | 6 (20.7%) | |
| 41-60 | 23 (9.5%) | 18 (78.3%) | 5 (21.7%) | |
| Place of blood collection | Urban areas | 193 (79.8%) | 137 (71.0%) | 56 (29.0%) |
| Rural areas | 49 (20.2%) | 36 (73.5%) | 13 (26.5%) | |
| Total | 242 | 173 (71.5%) | 69 (28.5%) | |
VNRBD, volunteer non remunerated blood donor
Results of the serological screening in the detection of T. pallidum versus PCR
| Number tested | PCR- | PCR + | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RPR- & CMIA- | 28 | 28/28 (100.0%) | 0 |
| RPR- & CMIA + | 31 | 28/31 (90.3%) | 3/31 (9.7%) |
| RPR+ & CMIA- | 75 | 73/75 (97.3%) | 2/75 (2.7%) |
| RPR+ & CMIA + | 108 | 97/108 (89.8%) | 11/108 (10.2%) |
| Total | 242 | 226 /242 (93.4%) | 16/242 (6.6%) |
Performance of two serological methods using PCR testing as a confirmation test
| Tests | Sensitivity | Specificity |
|---|---|---|
| RPR | 81.3%(13/16) | 24.8%(56/226) |
| CMIA | 87.5% (14/16) | 44.7%(101/226) |