Literature DB >> 26113754

Detector Calibration factor for interstitial in-vivo light dosimetry using isotropic detectors with scattering tip.

Timothy C Zhu1, Andreea Dimofte1, Jarod C Finlay1, Eli Glatstein1, Stephen M Hahn1.   

Abstract

Isotropic detectors with spherical scattering tips are commonly used for in-vivo dosimetry of light fluence rate during photodynamic therapy (PDT). These detectors are typically calibrated in-air. It has been well established that the response of an isotropic detector is a function of the refractive index (n) of the surrounding medium when it is surrounded by an infinite medium of uniform n. However, there are few, if any, studies of the isotropic detector response when the detector is placed in a secondary medium, such as air, before it is placed inside the infinite uniform medium. This condition often arises when one places the isotropic detector inside an air-filled catheter which is then inserted into a turbid medium, such as tissue. We have performed theoretical and experimental studies to determine the correction factors in water (n = 1.33), which has a refractive index similar to that of tissue (n = 1.4). We found that the resulting correction factor is almost the same (within 20%) as the correction factor for the outermost medium (the water) rather than the immediate medium surrounding the isotropic detector (air). The detector correction factor is also a function of the index of refraction of the probe material. For a 1-mm diameter probe from CardioFocus, the detector correction factor varied from 1 (in air) to 1.09 (at air-water interface) to 1.49 (completely submerged in water). At the air-water interface the spherical bulb of the isotropic detector is placed half in air and half in water. For a 0.5-mm diameter probe from the same company, it varied from 1 (in air) to 1.32 (at air-water interface) to 1.87 (in water). For a 0.3-mm diameter probe from the same company, it varied from 1 (in air) to 1.32 (at air-water interface) to 1.71 (in water). We have also found that the detector response changes by less than 10% when the detector position is varied from touching the catheter wall closest to the light source, to not touching, to touching the catheter wall farthest from the light source. The calibration factors between individual isotropic detectors of the same type varied within 5% for all detector types. Thus mean correction factor can be used for each individual isotropic detector of the same type.

Entities:  

Keywords:  In-vivo light dosimetry; detector calibration factor; diffusion approximation

Year:  2005        PMID: 26113754      PMCID: PMC4477970          DOI: 10.1117/12.590330

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng        ISSN: 0277-786X


  3 in total

1.  Calculating the response of isotropic light dosimetry probes as a function of the tissue refractive index.

Authors:  W M Star; J P Marijnissen
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  1989-06-15       Impact factor: 1.980

2.  Calibration of isotropic light dosimetry probes based on scattering bulbs in clear media.

Authors:  J P Marijnissen; W M Star
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 3.  Light dosimetry in vivo.

Authors:  W M Star
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 3.609

  3 in total
  7 in total

1.  A method for determination of the absorption and scattering properties interstitially in turbid media.

Authors:  Andreea Dimofte; Jarod C Finlay; Timothy C Zhu
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2005-05-05       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Determination of the distribution of drug concentration and tissue optical properties for ALA-mediated anal photodynamic therapy.

Authors:  Yi Hong Ong; Andrew C Li; Theresa M Busch; Timothy C Zhu
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2021-03-08

3.  A Comparison of Two Probes to Determine Rectum Optical Properties.

Authors:  Andrew C Li; Yi Hong Ong; Celina Li; Jie He; Andreea Dimofte; Theresa M Busch; Brian C Wilson; Robert Weersink; Timothy C Zhu
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2021-03-12

4.  Determination of tissue optical properties in PDT treated Head & Neck patients.

Authors:  Andreea Dimofte; Jarod C Finlay; Anna V Sharikova; Keith A Cengel; Peter Ahn; Theresa M Busch; Timothy C Zhu
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2014-02-01

5.  In-vivo light dosimetry of interstitial PDT of human prostate.

Authors:  Timothy C Zhu; Jun Li; Jarod C Finlay; Andreea Dimofte; Diana Stripp; Bruce S Malkowicz; Stephen M Hahn
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2006-01-21

6.  A Novel Prospective Study Assessing the Combination of Photodynamic Therapy and Proton Radiation Therapy: Safety and Outcomes When Treating Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma.

Authors:  Stephanie R Rice; Yun R Li; Theresa M Busch; Michele M Kim; Sally McNulty; Andrea Dimofte; Timothy C Zhu; Keith A Cengel; Charles B Simone
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol       Date:  2018-12-28       Impact factor: 3.421

7.  Determination of optical properties in heterogeneous turbid media using a cylindrical diffusing fiber.

Authors:  Andreea Dimofte; Jarod C Finlay; Xing Liang; Timothy C Zhu
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 3.609

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.