| Literature DB >> 26113715 |
Rosa Rugani1, Giorgio Vallortigara2, Konstantinos Priftis3, Lucia Regolin3.
Abstract
Mangalam and Karve raise concerns on whether our results demonstrate a mental number line, suggesting auxiliary experiments. Further data analyses show that their methodological concerns are not founded. Harshaw suggests that a side bias could have affected our results. We show that this concern is also unfounded.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26113715 DOI: 10.1126/science.aab0002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Science ISSN: 0036-8075 Impact factor: 47.728