Literature DB >> 26113715

ANIMAL COGNITION. Response to Comments on "Number-space mapping in the newborn chick resembles humans' mental number line".

Rosa Rugani1, Giorgio Vallortigara2, Konstantinos Priftis3, Lucia Regolin3.   

Abstract

Mangalam and Karve raise concerns on whether our results demonstrate a mental number line, suggesting auxiliary experiments. Further data analyses show that their methodological concerns are not founded. Harshaw suggests that a side bias could have affected our results. We show that this concern is also unfounded.
Copyright © 2015, American Association for the Advancement of Science.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26113715     DOI: 10.1126/science.aab0002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  4 in total

Review 1.  Number-space associations without language: Evidence from preverbal human infants and non-human animal species.

Authors:  Rosa Rugani; Maria-Dolores de Hevia
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-04

2.  Numerical magnitude, rather than individual bias, explains spatial numerical association in newborn chicks.

Authors:  Rosa Rugani; Giorgio Vallortigara; Konstantinos Priftis; Lucia Regolin
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 8.140

3.  Piece of Evidence. Commentary: Ancestral Mental Number Lines: What Is the Evidence?

Authors:  Rosa Rugani; Giorgio Vallortigara; Konstantinos Priftis; Lucia Regolin
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-04-22

Review 4.  Numbers in Action.

Authors:  Rosa Rugani; Luisa Sartori
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 3.169

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.