| Literature DB >> 26113513 |
Xiang Nong1, Feng-Zheng Chen1, Yao-Jun Yang2, Zi Liang3, Bao-Lian Huang3, Yi Li3, Tian-Fei Liu4, Hua Yu5.
Abstract
The bamboo aphid, Pseudoregma bambucicola, is an important insect pest of bamboo that affects normal bamboo growth and induces sooty molds. The control of P. bambucicola involves the application of chemicals, such as imidacloprid, to which many species are resistant. In this study, we isolate a novel botanical pesticide (9-oxo-10,11-dehydro-ageraphorone) from an Eupatorium adenophorum(Asteraceae: Compositae) petroleum ether extract and test the aphicidal activity of this compound against P. bambucicola in laboratory bioassay and field-based experiments. This ageraphorone compound at a concentration of 2 mg/ml caused 73.33% mortality (corrected mortality [Subtracted the mortality of the negative control]: 70%) of P. bambucicola by laboratory bioassay within 6 h. Even at lower concentrations, this compound caused greater 33% mortality (corrected mortality: 30%) of aphids. Field experiments with naturally infested bamboo plants showed that two applications of 2 mg/ml ageraphorone to infested plants completely cleared infestations within 30 d. These effects were similar to those of the positive control (imidacloprid). These results reveal that 9-oxo-10,11-dehydro-ageraphorone exhibits significant aphicidal activity against bamboo aphids. We suggest that future research be directed at developing this ageraphorone compound from E. adenophorum as an aphicidal agent for biocontrol.Entities:
Keywords: Ageraphorone; Pseudoregma bambucicola; bamboo aphid; insect biocontrol
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26113513 PMCID: PMC4535575 DOI: 10.1093/jisesa/iev060
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Insect Sci ISSN: 1536-2442 Impact factor: 1.857
Fig. 1.The structure of 9-oxo-10,11-dehydro-ageraphorone.
The aphicidal activity of 9-oxo-10,11-dehydro-ageraphorone against P. bambucicola with laboratory bioassay
| Different concentration of ageraphorone | Mean mortality (%) ± SE of each observation time (min) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 120 min | 180 min | 300 min | 360 min | |
| 2 mg/ml (ageraphorone) | 16.67 ± 3.33c(b) | 23.33 ± 3.33c(b) | 50.00 ± 10.00b(a) | 73.33 ± 6.67a(ab) |
| 1 mg/ml (ageraphorone) | 13.33 ± 3.33c(bc) | 26.67 ± 3.33bc(b) | 40.00 ± 5.77b(ab) | 60.00 ± 5.77a(b) |
| 0.5 mg/ml (ageraphorone) | 3.33 ± 3.33c(cd) | 13.33 ± 6.67bc(bc) | 23.33 ± 3.33ab(b) | 33.33 ± 6.67a(c) |
| 0.25 mg/ml (ageraphorone) | 3.33 ± 3.33c(cd) | 13.33 ± 6.67bc(bc) | 23.33 ± 3.33ab(b) | 33.33 ± 6.67a(c) |
| Positive (imidacloprid) | 40.00 ± 5.77b(a) | 46.67 ± 3.33b(a) | 56.67 ± 6.37b(a) | 83.33 ± 3.33a(a) |
| Untreated (glycerin and distilled water 1:1) | 0.00 ± 0.00a(d) | 3.33 ± 3.33a(c) | 3.33 ± 3.33a(c) | 3.33 ± 3.33a(d) |
Ten P. bambucicola aphids and three replicates were performed for each concentration. SE: standard error of means. Different lower case letters within a row denote significant differences between different times (P < 0.05). Different lower case letters in brackets within a column denote significant differences between different concentrations (P < 0.05).
The probit regression analysis of toxicity (LT50) of ageraphorone against aphids with laboratory bioassay
| Different concentration of ageraphorone | Regression line | LT50/(h) (95% FL) |
|---|---|---|
| 2 mg/ml | 4.5 (3.8–5.6) | |
| 1 mg/ml | 5.4 (4.3–8.4) | |
| 0.5 mg/ml | 8.9 (6.3–34.9) |
Regression line: the equation reflect the relationship between the toxicity and the concentration of ageraphorone; LT50, median lethal time value; 95% FL, the overall parameter is 95% in this range.
Fig. 2.Observations of the field treatment effects on infected bamboos. Plants in group A were treated with 2 mg/ml of the ageraphorone extract from E. adenophorum. Plants in group B were treated with imidacloprid, whereas plants in group C were untreated (treated with glycerine and distilled water 1:1). The photos A1, B1, and C1 show aphid infestations prior to “treatment.” The photos A2, B2, and C2 show observations of typical infestations on day 4 posttreatment, whereas photos A3, B3, and C3 show observations of typical infestations on day 8 posttreatment.
The results of field trial-field treatment effect (%) score of different groups (mean ± SE) against P. bambucicola
| Treatment groups | Field treatment effect (%) score of different groups (mean ± SE) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 d | 4 d | 8 d | 12 d | 30 d | |
| A: 2 mg/ml ageraphorone | 0.00 ± 0.00d(a) | 31.33 ± 6.57c(ab) | 76.67 ± 1.67b(a) | 96.33 ± 0.88a(a) | 100.00 ± 0.00a(a) |
| B: Positive control (imidacloprid) | 0.00 ± 0.00d(a) | 51.00 ± 2.31c(a) | 90.00 ± 5.29b(a) | 100.00 ± 0.00a(a) | 100.00 ± 0.00a(a) |
| C: Untreated control (glycerin and distilled water 1:1) | 0.00 ± 0.00a(a) | 17.00 ± 9.54a(b) | 12.33 ± 7.88a(b) | 7.17 ± 6.43a(b) | 6.00 ± 6.00a(b) |
The field experiment was performed in a bamboo grove where severe infestation by P. bambucicola. Nine bamboo plants were randomly divided into three groups (A, B, and C). Plants in group A were treated with 2 mg/ml of 9-oxo-10,11-dehydro-ageraphorone, whereas group B were treated with imidacloprid, and plants in group C were administered with glycerin and distilled water (1:1). SE, standard error. Field treatment effect (%) = (aphid reduction rate of treated group – aphid reduction rate of control group)/(100 – aphid reduction rate of control group) × 100%. Different lower case letters within a row denote significant differences between different times (P < 0.05). Different lower case letters in brackets within a column denote significant differences between different concentrations (P < 0.05).