Literature DB >> 26113446

Cue-independent forgetting by intentional suppression - Evidence for inhibition as the mechanism of intentional forgetting.

Yingying Wang1, Zhijun Cao2, Zijian Zhu3, Huaqian Cai4, Yanhong Wu5.   

Abstract

People are able to intentionally forget unwanted memories through voluntary suppression, as revealed by the Think/No-think (TNT) paradigm. However, the nature of intentional forgetting is controversial. Findings that forgetting is independent of retrieval cues suggest that inhibitory control underlies intentional forgetting, but this result is also in line with an interference account. To resolve this controversy, we have directly contrasted the cue-independent characteristic of suppression versus interference. A double-cue paradigm was used, in which two different cues were associated with the same target during initial memory formation. Only one cue-target association received further interference/suppression training. In the test phase, when both cues were used to retrieve the target, we found that interference caused memory impairment that was restricted to the trained cue-target association, while suppression induced forgetting that generalized to the independent cue-target association. Therefore, the effect of suppression differs from that of interference. The cue-independent forgetting by voluntary suppression indicates that the target memory itself is inhibited, providing evidence that the underlying mechanism of suppression-induced forgetting is inhibitory control.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Independent-cue technique; Inhibition; Intentional forgetting; Interference; Memory retrieval

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26113446     DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.05.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  10 in total

1.  Retrieval suppression induced forgetting on 1-week-old consolidated episodic memories.

Authors:  Yingying Wang; Zijian Zhu
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2022-03-31

2.  Active suppression prevents the return of threat memory in humans.

Authors:  Ye Wang; Zijian Zhu; Jingchu Hu; Daniela Schiller; Jian Li
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2021-05-21

3.  Suppressing Unwanted Memories Reduces Their Unintended Influences.

Authors:  Xiaoqing Hu; Zara M Bergström; Pierre Gagnepain; Michael C Anderson
Journal:  Curr Dir Psychol Sci       Date:  2017-04-06

4.  What doesn't kill you makes you stronger: Psychological trauma and its relationship to enhanced memory control.

Authors:  Justin C Hulbert; Michael C Anderson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2018-07-19

5.  The impact of retrieval suppression on conceptual implicit memory.

Authors:  Assaf Taubenfeld; Michael C Anderson; Daniel A Levy
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2018-12-07

6.  Reconsidering unconscious persistence: Suppressing unwanted memories reduces their indirect expression in later thoughts.

Authors:  Yingying Wang; Andrea Luppi; Jonathan Fawcett; Michael C Anderson
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2019-03-07

7.  Successfully controlling intrusive memories is harder when control must be sustained.

Authors:  Kevin van Schie; Michael C Anderson
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2017-02-21

Review 8.  Prefrontal-hippocampal interactions supporting the extinction of emotional memories: the retrieval stopping model.

Authors:  Michael C Anderson; Stan B Floresco
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2021-08-26       Impact factor: 7.853

9.  Does retrieving a memory insulate it against memory inhibition? A retroactive interference study.

Authors:  Justin C Hulbert; Michael C Anderson
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2020-01-19

10.  Repeated retrieval of generalized memories can impair specific autobiographical recall: A retrieval induced forgetting account.

Authors:  Noboru Matsumoto; Satoshi Mochizuki; Laura Marsh; Jun Kawaguchi
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2021-01-14
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.