G Kayem1,2, C Dupont3, M H Bouvier-Colle1, R C Rudigoz3, C Deneux-Tharaux1. 1. Inserm UMR 1153, Obstetrical, Perinatal and Paediatric Epidemiology Research Team (EPOPé), Centre for Epidemiology and Statistics Sorbonne Paris Cité, DHU Risks in Pregnancy, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France. 2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, APHP, Trousseau Hospital, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France. 3. Aurore Perinatal Network, Hôpital de la Croix Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To describe the characteristics, management, and outcomes of women undergoing invasive therapies for primary postpartum haemorrhage (PPH). DESIGN: A population-based observational study. SETTING: All 106 maternity units of six French regions. POPULATION: A total of 146 781 women delivering between 2004 and 2006. METHODS: Prospective identification of women with PPH managed with invasive therapies, including uterine suture, pelvic vessel ligation, arterial embolisation, and hysterectomy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Rate of use and failure rate of invasive therapies, with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). RESULTS: An invasive therapy was used in 296 of 6660 women with PPH (4.4%, 95% CI 4.0-5.0), and in 0.2% of deliveries (95% CI 0.18-0.23). A hysterectomy was performed in 72/6660 women with PPH (1.1%, 95% CI 0.8-1.4%), and in 0.05% of deliveries (95% CI 0.04-0.06). A conservative invasive therapy was used in 262 women, including 183 (70%) who underwent arterial embolisation and 79 (30%) who had conservative surgery as the first-line therapy. Embolisation was more frequently used after vaginal than caesarean delivery, and when arterial embolisation was available on site. The failure rate of conservative invasive therapies was 41/262 (15.6%, 95% CI 11.5-20.6) overall, and was higher after surgical than after embolisation procedures, in particular for vaginal deliveries. CONCLUSIONS: Both maternal mortality as a result of obstetric haemorrhage and the rate of invasive therapies used for PPH are high in France. These findings suggest flaws in the initial management of PPH and/or the inadequate use of invasive procedures. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Maternal mortality as a result of haemorrhage and the rate of invasive therapies used for PPH are high in France.
OBJECTIVE: To describe the characteristics, management, and outcomes of women undergoing invasive therapies for primary postpartum haemorrhage (PPH). DESIGN: A population-based observational study. SETTING: All 106 maternity units of six French regions. POPULATION: A total of 146 781 women delivering between 2004 and 2006. METHODS: Prospective identification of women with PPH managed with invasive therapies, including uterine suture, pelvic vessel ligation, arterial embolisation, and hysterectomy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Rate of use and failure rate of invasive therapies, with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). RESULTS: An invasive therapy was used in 296 of 6660 women with PPH (4.4%, 95% CI 4.0-5.0), and in 0.2% of deliveries (95% CI 0.18-0.23). A hysterectomy was performed in 72/6660 women with PPH (1.1%, 95% CI 0.8-1.4%), and in 0.05% of deliveries (95% CI 0.04-0.06). A conservative invasive therapy was used in 262 women, including 183 (70%) who underwent arterial embolisation and 79 (30%) who had conservative surgery as the first-line therapy. Embolisation was more frequently used after vaginal than caesarean delivery, and when arterial embolisation was available on site. The failure rate of conservative invasive therapies was 41/262 (15.6%, 95% CI 11.5-20.6) overall, and was higher after surgical than after embolisation procedures, in particular for vaginal deliveries. CONCLUSIONS: Both maternal mortality as a result of obstetric haemorrhage and the rate of invasive therapies used for PPH are high in France. These findings suggest flaws in the initial management of PPH and/or the inadequate use of invasive procedures. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Maternal mortality as a result of haemorrhage and the rate of invasive therapies used for PPH are high in France.
Authors: Stephen J McCall; Dacia Henriquez; Hellen McKinnon Edwards; Thomas van den Akker; Kitty W M Bloemenkamp; Johanna van der Bom; Marie-Pierre Bonnet; Catherine Deneux-Tharaux; Serena Donati; Ada Gillissen; Jennifer J Kurinczuk; Zhuoyang Li; Alice Maraschini; Aurélien Seco; Elizabeth Sullivan; Simon Stanworth; Marian Knight Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-01-22 Impact factor: 3.240