Literature DB >> 26113023

iTRAQ-based quantitative proteomics analysis of rice leaves infected by Rice stripe virus reveals several proteins involved in symptom formation.

Biao Wang1, Jamal-U-Ddin Hajano2, Yingdang Ren3, Chuantao Lu4, Xifeng Wang5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Rice plants infected by Rice stripe virus (RSV) usually leads to chlorosis and death of newly emerged leaves. However, the mechanism of RSV-induced these symptoms was not clear.
METHODS: We used an iTRAQ approach for a quantitative proteomics comparison of non-infected and infected rice leaves. RT-qPCR and Northern blot analyses were performed for assessing the transcription of candidate genes.
RESULTS: As a whole, 681 (65.8% downregulated, 34.2% upregulated infected vs. non-infected) differentially accumulated proteins were identified. A bioinformatics analysis indicated that ten of these regulated proteins are involved in chlorophyll biosynthesis and three in cell death processes. Subsequent RT-qPCR results showed that downregulation of magnesium chelatase was due to reduced expression levels of the genes encoding subunits CHLI and CHLD, which resulted in chlorophyll reduction involved in leaf chlorosis. Three aspartic proteases expressed higher in RSV-infected leaves than those in the control leaves, which were also implicated in RSV-induced cell death. Northern blot analyses of CHLI and p0026h03.19 confirmed the RT-qPCR results.
CONCLUSIONS: The magnesium chelatase and aspartic proteases may be associated with RSV-induced leaf chlorosis and cell death, respectively. The findings may yield new insights into mechanisms underlying rice stripe disease symptom formation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26113023      PMCID: PMC4489111          DOI: 10.1186/s12985-015-0328-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Virol J        ISSN: 1743-422X            Impact factor:   4.099


Background

Rice stripe virus (RSV), a member of the genus Tenuivirus, is one of the most economically important viruses in eastern Asia including China, Korea, and Japan [1]. In 1964, RSV was reported for the first time in Zhejiang Province [2] and then spread to 18 provinces in rice-growing areas of China [3]. From 2000 to 2005, 1,700,000 ha of rice fields were affected by this virus in Jiangsu Province, including 1,000,000 ha area where incidence was so severe that yield losses exceeded 50 %, and in some places no rice was harvested [4]. RSV is transmitted predominantly in a persistent propagative manner by the small brown planthopper (SBPH; Laodelphax striatellus Fallen) [5] and can be transmitted transovarially for more than 40 generations [6]. RSV has four single-stranded RNA segments, named RNA 1, 2, 3 and 4 in order of their molecular weight. Among these, RNA 3 encodes a nucleocapsid protein (NCP) from the viral complementary RNA [7], while RNA 4 encodes a disease specific protein (SP) from the viral RNA [8]. RSV-induced symptoms of rice typically are chlorotic stripes and mottlings on the leaves. Newly emerged leaves exhibit yellow stripes or necrosis, then folding and twisting; plants are stunted and finally dead [1]. Leaf chlorosis in general is widely accepted as a sign of reduction in chlorophyll [9, 10], and leaf chlorosis upon virus infection is also related to decreased chlorophyll [11]. Subsequent studies have shown that various molecular mechanisms are involved in leaf chlorosis during virus infection. For example, during Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV) infection, the expression of the genes encoding magnesium chelatase is regulated by CMV satellite RNA, thus blocking chlorophyll biosynthesis [12, 13]. In addition, chlorotic symptoms induced by African cassava mosaic virus (ACMV) are linked to the expression level of chlorophyll-related genes encoding proteins such as chlorophyllide a and chlorophyllide b [14]. However, the chlorosis on tobacco leaves during the flavum strain of Tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) infection not resulted from the reduction of chlorophyll biosynthesis, but was reduction of the core complexes of photosystem II and the oxygen evolving complex [15]. In a recent report, RSV SP interacted with PsbP (an oxygen-evolving complex protein) resulting in the downregulation of PsbP in chloroplasts, and then modulating RSV symptoms through disruption of chloroplast structure and function [16]. Whether other chlorophyll relation proteins are modulated during RSV infection has not been known. In addition, if the cultivar is susceptible to RSV infection, newly emerged rice leaves usually exhibit necrosis [1]. Previous report indicated that a vacuolar processing enzyme that has caspase protease activity was indispensable for the TMV-induced hypersensitive response, which involves programmed cell death in tobacco [17]. Even in an uninfected healthy plant, the expression of aspartic proteases induces programmed cell death, and then involves in senescence [18]. Nevertheless, we still need to elucidate how the expression of aspartic proteases is regulated after RSV infection. Therefore, the key rice protein(s) involved in RSV-induced disease symptom formation require(s) further exploration. Some techniques have been shown as powerful tools for understanding plant-pathogen interactions, including yeast two-hybrid system [19-21], glutathione-S transferase pull-down assay [22, 23], immunofluorescence laser scanning confocal microscopy [24, 25], 2D gel-based technology [26, 27], and iTRAQ (isobaric tag for relative and absolute quantitation) LC-MS/MS (liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry) technology [28]. iTRAQ LC-MS/MS technology adopted stable isotope labeling strategies of proteins or peptides for measurement and allowed relative quantitation comparison using an internal reference, and could simultaneously label and accurately quantify proteins from multiple samples [29, 30]. In this study, by using an iTRAQ-based quantitative proteomics approach, we analyzed protein accumulation profiles of RSV-infected leaves in comparison with healthy leaves to explore symptom formation and to understand rice-RSV interactions.

Results

Symptom formation and RT-PCR confirmation of infection

There were 10 viruliferous SBPH allowed to feed on each plant of cv. Aichiasahi for 2-day inoculation access period. Newly emerged leaves on the initially inoculated plant developed pale-yellow stripes, which then collapsed in the form of blotches at 21 days post inoculation (dpi) (Fig. 1a). At 23 dpi, severe necrosis resulted in plant death (Fig. 1b). No disease symptoms were observed on mock plants. Samples of RSV-infected plants and control plants that were collected at 21 dpi to confirm infection by RT-PCR yielded an expected 969-bp fragment that was also found in a previously confirmed-positive sample (Fig. 1c). The 969-bp fragment was not present in the mock control or no-template control (NTC).
Fig. 1

Typical chlorotic stripes and necrosis symptoms in rice plants induced by Rice stripe virus (RSV) and infection confirmation by RT-PCR detection. Both RSV-infected and mock rice plants were shown at (a) 21 days post inoculation (dpi) and (b) 23 dpi; (c) RT-PCR confirming that 969-bp fragment for RSV nucleocapsid gene (NCP) was absent in mock and present in symptomatic RSV-infected plants. Mock rice had typical healthy growth, but RSV-infected leaves showed typical chlorosis at 21 dpi (corner of panel a), and the entire plant was dead at 23 dpi (b). M, DL2000 DNA marker; P, RSV infected sample as positive control; N, healthy sample as negative control; 1-3, mock leaves; 4-6, RSV-infected leaves

Typical chlorotic stripes and necrosis symptoms in rice plants induced by Rice stripe virus (RSV) and infection confirmation by RT-PCR detection. Both RSV-infected and mock rice plants were shown at (a) 21 days post inoculation (dpi) and (b) 23 dpi; (c) RT-PCR confirming that 969-bp fragment for RSV nucleocapsid gene (NCP) was absent in mock and present in symptomatic RSV-infected plants. Mock rice had typical healthy growth, but RSV-infected leaves showed typical chlorosis at 21 dpi (corner of panel a), and the entire plant was dead at 23 dpi (b). M, DL2000 DNA marker; P, RSV infected sample as positive control; N, healthy sample as negative control; 1-3, mock leaves; 4-6, RSV-infected leaves

Protein identification and quantification

When the iTRAQ approach was used to analyze proteins obtained from RSV-infected leaves and mock leaves which were collected at 21 dpi, 128,144 spectra were totally obtained from an ABI-5600 system and then approximately 59,824 MS spectra identified matched known spectra. Overall, 3687 different proteins were identified when a false discovery rate (FDR) <1 % was applied to the dataset (Fig. 2). A total of 681 proteins were differentially accumulated, with a fold-change >1.5 (P < 0.05); 448 were downregulated, and 223 had a fold-change <0.67 (P < 0.05) (Table 1).
Fig. 2

Statistics for total spectra for reversed-phase HPLC and LC-MS/MS, identified proteins and differentially accumulated proteins from iTRAQ proteomics by searching and analysis of NCBI database. Spectra scan ranged from 350 to 1800 m / z. Number refer to statistics of different parts: total spectra were generated from the iTRAQ experiment using the materials (RSV-infected and mock leaves); spectra identified matched known spectra; proteins identified analyses were determined by spectra identified upon the NCBI database; differentially accumulated proteins analysis based on the fold-change >1.5 or <0.667 (P < 0.05); downregulation proteins with fold-change >1.5 (P < 0.05); upregulation proteins with fold-change <0.667 (P < 0.05)

Table 1

Summary of the proteins identified by iTRAQ as being differentially accumulated in RSV-inoculated plants compared with mock-inoculated rice plants at 21dpi

RegulationNo. of proteinsDavidGOa Categoriesb Percentagec No. of functional groups
Down448 (65.8 %)332317203 BP61.153
154 CC46.420
233 MF70.233
129 KEGG38.916
unknown 116
Up233 (34.2 %)178175112-BP62.917
64 CC36.013
125 MF70.216
7 -KEGG39.913
unknown 55
Total681

Note: Using the David platform, 332 downregulated and 178 upregulated proteins were analyzed, and 317 and 175 proteins were annotated by GO, respectively. Annotated proteins were clustered by groups based on the BP, CC, MF and KEGG analyses

aGO annotation: BP, biological process; CC, cellular component; MF, molecular function

bCategories based on BP, CC, MF and KEGG

cPercentage of total proteins annotated

Statistics for total spectra for reversed-phase HPLC and LC-MS/MS, identified proteins and differentially accumulated proteins from iTRAQ proteomics by searching and analysis of NCBI database. Spectra scan ranged from 350 to 1800 m / z. Number refer to statistics of different parts: total spectra were generated from the iTRAQ experiment using the materials (RSV-infected and mock leaves); spectra identified matched known spectra; proteins identified analyses were determined by spectra identified upon the NCBI database; differentially accumulated proteins analysis based on the fold-change >1.5 or <0.667 (P < 0.05); downregulation proteins with fold-change >1.5 (P < 0.05); upregulation proteins with fold-change <0.667 (P < 0.05) Summary of the proteins identified by iTRAQ as being differentially accumulated in RSV-inoculated plants compared with mock-inoculated rice plants at 21dpi Note: Using the David platform, 332 downregulated and 178 upregulated proteins were analyzed, and 317 and 175 proteins were annotated by GO, respectively. Annotated proteins were clustered by groups based on the BP, CC, MF and KEGG analyses aGO annotation: BP, biological process; CC, cellular component; MF, molecular function bCategories based on BP, CC, MF and KEGG cPercentage of total proteins annotated

Bioinformatics analysis

The identified and quantified proteins were then analyzed for function, pathway and interaction network. In the GO analysis, 358 proteins were involved in molecular function, 233 (70.2 %, 35 functional groups) were downregulated and 125 (70.2 %, 16 functional groups) were upregulated (Table 1, Additional file 1: Table S1). The molecular function of downregulated proteins was mainly in cofactor binding (14.2 %), electron carrier activity (10.7 %), coenzyme binding (10.3 %), calcium ion binding (6.0 %), antioxidant activity (5.6 %), magnesium ion binding (4.7 %), peroxidase activity (3.9 %), vitamin B6 binding (3.4 %), FAD (flavin adenine dinucleotide) binding (3.4 %), and primary active transmembrane transporter activity (3.0 %) (Fig. 3a, Additional file 1: Table S1). Upregulated proteins were involved in cofactor binding (15.2 %), peptidase activity (13.6 %), coenzyme binding (12.0 %), electron carrier activity (12.0 %), endopeptidase activity (8.8 %), threonine-type peptidase activity (5.6 %), antioxidant activity (5.6 %), unfolded protein binding (4.8 %), FAD binding (4.8 %), and disulfide oxidoreductase activity (4.0 %) (Fig. 3b, Additional file 1: Table S1). Peptidase activity, the largest group within the catalytic activity group, comprised metallopeptidase activity, aspartic-type endopeptidase, cysteine-type peptidase activity, serine-type peptidase activity. Biological process was influenced by 315 proteins, 203 (61.1 %, 53 functional groups) downregulated proteins which mostly were involved in oxidation reduction (23.2 %), nitrogen compound biosynthesis (16.3 %), photosynthesis (12.3 %), generation of precursor metabolites and energy (11.8 %), cofactor metabolism (10.8 %), translation (9.9 %), monosaccharide metabolism (9.4 %), hexose metabolism (8.4 %), carboxylic acid biosynthesis (8.4 %), glucose metabolism (7.9 %) (Fig. 3a, Additional file 1: Table S1). The other 112 (62.9 %, 17 groups) upregulated proteins were mostly involved in oxidation reduction (25.0 %), proteolysis (17.0 %), generation of precursor metabolites and energy (12.5 %), macromolecule catabolism (11.6 %), protein catabolism (10.7 %), cellular protein catabolism (8.9 %), cofactor metabolism (8.0 %), cellular homeostasis (8.0 %), protein folding (6.3 %), and carbohydrate catabolism (6.3 %) (Fig. 3b, Additional file 1: Table S1). Cellular components that were downregulated included 154 proteins (46.4 %, 20 component groups), located in the plastid (70.8 %), chloroplast (31.8 %), thylakoid (12.3 %), photosynthetic membrane (9.1 %), organellar membrane (9.1 %), thylakoid part (7.8 %), plastid part (7.8 %), photosystem (6.5 %), chloroplast part (5.2 %), extrinsic to membrane (5.2 %), and oxygen evolving complex (4.5 %) (Fig. 3a, Additional file 1: Table S1). The 64 (36.0 %, 13 component groups) upregulated proteins were located in the cytosol (17.2 %), proteasome complex (15.6 %), organelle membrane (12.5 %), proteasome core complex (10.9 %), endoplasmic reticulum (9.4 %), Golgi apparatus (9.4 %), envelope (7.8 %), mitochondrial membrane (6.3 %), ribosomal subunit (4.7 %), membrane coat (4.7 %), and cell junction (3.1 %) (Fig. 3b, Additional file 1: Table S1).
Fig. 3

Gene Ontology enrichment analysis of differentially accumulated proteins from RSV-infected leaves compared with mock leaves. a Downregulated differentially accumulated proteins were annotated among 33 groups for molecular function (MF), 53 for biological process (BP) and 20 for cellular components (CC), respectively; b, Functional grouping of upregulated differentially accumulated proteins: 16 for MF, 17 for BP and 13 for CC

Gene Ontology enrichment analysis of differentially accumulated proteins from RSV-infected leaves compared with mock leaves. a Downregulated differentially accumulated proteins were annotated among 33 groups for molecular function (MF), 53 for biological process (BP) and 20 for cellular components (CC), respectively; b, Functional grouping of upregulated differentially accumulated proteins: 16 for MF, 17 for BP and 13 for CC The KEGG pathway analyses indicated that among the downregulated proteins, 13 % were involved in the biosynthesis of plant hormones; 9 % in photosynthesis, carbon fixation in photosynthetic organisms, biosynthesis of terpenoids and steroid; and 4 % in porphyrin and chlorophyll metabolism (Fig. 4a). However, among the upregulated proteins, 16 % were involved in biosynthesis of plant hormones, 11 % in biosynthesis of alkaloids derived from shikimate pathway, 10 % in biosynthesis of phenylpropanoids, and 9 % in proteasome, starch and sucrose metabolism, citrate cycle, tryptophan metabolism, fatty acid metabolism, propanoate metabolism, and pentose and glucuronate interconversions (Fig. 4b). When the identified proteins were analyzed with the STRING software, the results showed that 547 proteins were interacting with each other. In the constructed interaction network (Additional file 2: Figure S1), the proteins were roughly divided into three groups: metabolism (B), chloroplast (C) and defense (D).
Fig. 4

Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways of differentially accumulated proteins that are identified from mock leaves and RSV-infected leaves for (a) downregulated and (b) upregulated. a downregulated proteins were annotated and participated in 16 pathways; (b) upregulated proteins were classified 13 pathways

Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways of differentially accumulated proteins that are identified from mock leaves and RSV-infected leaves for (a) downregulated and (b) upregulated. a downregulated proteins were annotated and participated in 16 pathways; (b) upregulated proteins were classified 13 pathways

Proteins differentially accumulated in response to RSV infection

Metabolism group

Functions of the down- and up-regulated differentially accumulated metabolism group of proteins included monosaccharide metabolism, disaccharide metabolism, polysaccharide metabolism, generation of precursor metabolites and energy, amino acid metabolism, fatty acid metabolism, phosphorus metabolism, and sulfur metabolism. Basically, carbohydrate metabolism provided more suitable source of energy and carbon for plant development. For example, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH; 115458768, 115450493) and fructose-bisphosphate aldolase (115484401, 115468886, 115434198) were two important metabolic enzymes in glycolysis and gluconeogenesis [31]. Notable, evidences increasingly support the nonglycolytic functions of GAPDH, including apoptosis, DNA and RNA replication, DNA repair, RNA exportation, RNA synthesis, immunity response to various pathogens [32-38]. GAPDH strong binding of negative strand Tomato bushy stunt virus (TBSV) was key regulatory step to promote asymmetric RNA synthesis, so GAPDH played a role in viral RNA replication and RNA synthesis [34]. However, GAPDH preferentially binds positive strand Bamboo mosaic virus (BaMV), and it negatively regulated the accumulation of BaMV [35]. Additionally, GAPDH negatively regulate autophagy interaction with host protein and immunity-associated cell death and defense on TMV infection [38]. GAPDH may be involved in viral replication and defense during RSV infection. Proteins that decreased in expression belonged to the vitamin, nucleotide, isoprenoid, phosphorus, sulfur and cofactor metabolism groups, suggesting that RSV infection inhibited their expression (Table 2). Thus, numerous biological processes helped rice to counteract RSV invasion.
Table 2

Differentially accumulated proteins between mock-inoculated leaves and RSV-infected leaves

Accession numberProtein name categorized by processCov (95)Number of Matching PeptidesRatio P-Value
Chlorophyll biosynthetic process
115453785Magnesium-chelatase subunit ChlI, chloroplastic46.72917.54.50 × 10-8
115438661Uroporphyrinogen decarboxylase 1, chloroplastic14.9813.42.85 × 10-2
115444475Porphobilinogen deaminase, chloroplastic51.12111.74.50 × 10-4
115456135Magnesium-chelatase subunit ChlD, chloroplastic27.8239.45.19 × 10-7
115477483Glutamate-1-semialdehyde 2,1-aminomutase, chloroplastic34.7265.32.85 × 10-2
115452897Uroporphyrinogen decarboxylase 2, chloroplastic36.4215.01.83 × 10-2
115436038Protoporphyrinogen oxidase, chloroplastic21.3124.83.07 × 10-4
115435974Magnesium-protoporphyrin IX monomethyl ester [oxidative] cyclase42.2253.71.16 × 10-5
115469822Delta-aminolevulinic acid dehydratase, chloroplastic29.1163.54.11 × 10-4
115482796Glutamyl-tRNA reductase, chloroplastic16.493.41.34 × 10-3
Photosynthesis
109156602Ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase large chain82.250844.11.71 × 10-5
115472625Oxygen-evolving enhancer protein 341.55731.93.46 × 10-5
115436780Putative 33 kDa oxygen evolving protein of photosystem II59.211928.32.30 × 10-10
115470529Probable photosystem II oxygen-evolving complex protein 258.36221.18.92 × 10-4
115488344Photosystem I reaction center subunit XI, chloroplast30.81319.13.57 × 10-2
115472753Chlorophyll a/b-binding protein49.03918.78.07 × 10-4
115477831Chloroplast photosystem I reaction center subunit II-like protein59.15018.43.46 × 10-7
115476576Putative chlorophyll a/b-binding protein36.52714.52.05 × 10-2
115458738OSJNBa0036B21.6 protein38.51913.72.74 × 10-4
115484899Chlorophyll a/b-binding protein63.26713.31.17 × 10-5
115470199PsbQ domain protein family, putative-like protein28.41110.91.53 × 10-3
115472785Putative chlorophyll a/b-binding protein of LHCII type III, chloroplast50.42010.44.90 × 10-3
115446893Putative Oxygen-evolving enhancer protein 3-2, chloroplast26.2610.12.74 × 10-2
115487694Photosystem I reaction centre subunit N, chloroplast28.2810.02.12 × 10-2
115450991Ribulose-phosphate 3-epimerase, chloroplastic50.0287.88.74 × 10-4
115467828Chlorophyll a/b-binding protein31.1277.86.31 × 10-3
115452127Fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase, chloroplastic38.9456.85.54 × 10-6
115482366PsbP family protein18.1165.61.14 × 10-3
115465942Ferredoxin--NADP reductase, leaf isozyme, chloroplastic49.7665.45.64 × 10-3
115447507Putative ferredoxin-thioredoxin reductase20.142.52.91 × 10-2
Defense response
115458852Bet v I allergen family protein29.950.31.89 × 10-3
115452513Pathogenesis-related protein 149.470.17.92 × 10-4
115489022Pathogenesis-related protein29.850.049.16 × 10-4
115489014Pathogenesis-related protein PR1025.640.031.88 × 10-2
Proteolysis
115470052ATP-dependent zinc metalloprotease FTSH 1, chloroplastic42.6509.93.31 × 10-8
115453893Membrane-associated zinc metalloprotease family protein17.677.78.99 × 10-4
115489316Eukaryotic aspartyl protease family protein25.1106.81.04 × 10-2
115447609ATP-dependent zinc metalloprotease FTSH 7, chloroplastic4.346.53.77 × 10-2
115480844Serine carboxypeptidase family protein13.385.63.69 × 10-2
115435898ATP-dependent Clp protease proteolytic subunit18.543.52.12 × 10-2
115450022Oligopeptidase A-like24.2203.21.35 × 10-4
115452585Probable glutamyl endopeptidase, chloroplastic15.0182.96.00 × 10-3
115488046Serine carboxypeptidase 111.242.74.20 × 10-2
115444859Peptidase aspartic24.1100.54.99 × 10-2
115437452Ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase16.270.43.60 × 10-2
115482252Ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2-23 kDa20.130.41.14 × 10-2
115483755Ubiquitin-activating enzyme E1 222.6250.43.41 × 10-3
115463349Putative DNA-binding protein GBP1626.0150.41.26 × 10-2
115454751Proteasome subunit beta type-230.290.42.65 × 10-2
115465685Putative serine carboxypeptidase24.9120.44.19 × 10-3
115451123Proteasome subunit alpha type-643.1130.31.22 × 10-3
115456219Leukotriene A-4 hydrolase homolog20.8120.36.69 × 10-3
115480143Proteasome subunit beta type36.370.31.63 × 10-2
115444057Proteasome subunit alpha type-140.0130.31.08 × 10-2
115440299Putative insulin degrading enzyme3.020.32.91 × 10-2
115440617Proteasome subunit alpha type-339.4100.34.04 × 10-2
115480019Proteasome subunit beta type-128.160.27.50 × 10-3
115448935Proteasome subunit beta type40.7120.26.34 × 10-4
115476300Aminopeptidase M1-B22.7190.28.85 × 10-5
115461973Aspartic proteinase23.8110.23.50 × 10-3
115445047Aminopeptidase M1-A18.8170.21.04 × 10-5
115451209Eukaryotic aspartyl protease family protein11.440.22.37 × 10-3
Protein transport
115475569Preprotein translocase subunit SECY, chloroplastic4.135.51.76 × 10-3
115454153SEC1 family transport protein SLY18.045.31.93 × 10-2
115451815Translocase of chloroplast20.273.11.42 × 10-2
115452177Protein TOC75, chloroplastic34.4252.93.10 × 10-6
115435528Importin-alpha re-exporter5.520.57.40 × 10-4
115435714GTP-binding protein21.230.34.33 × 10-2
115463933Putative GDP dissociation inhibitor30.8160.33.53 × 10-5
115454911Coatomer subunit alpha-122.6250.34.93 × 10-5
115461356Clathrin light chain 114.630.24.25 × 10-2
115463119Coatomer subunit delta-111.570.21.90 × 10-3
Translation
115480611Cysteinyl-tRNA synthetase11.868.71.93 × 10-3
11545039550S ribosomal protein L11, chloroplast38.1137.22.71 × 10-2
115488938Elongation factor Ts25.6456.71.06 × 10-9
115436768Tyrosine--tRNA ligase22.3126.63.46 × 10-3
115472897Ribosome-recycling factor, chloroplastic31.2176.61.13 × 10-3
115449027Putative isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase8.286.31.95 × 10-6
115470767Probable polyribonucleotide nucleotidyltransferase 1, chloroplastic9.6106.14.16 × 10-4
115445399Putative 50S ribosomal protein L21, chloroplast25.775.81.12 × 10-2
11548915060S ribosomal protein L230.6114.86.71 × 10-3
115486501Peptide chain release factor 117.874.74.88 × 10-4
5023396430S ribosomal protein S2, chloroplastic25.9104.58.95 × 10-4
115438779Peptide deformylase 1B, chloroplastic16.454.14.50 × 10-2
115458788OSJNBa0072F16.12 protein21.353.94.05 × 10-2
11545042750S ribosomal protein L5, chloroplastic42.6173.91.43 × 10-3
115448755Putative histidine-tRNA ligase6.643.84.60 × 10-2
11545160950S ribosomal protein L15, chloroplast29.7113.53.81 × 10-2
115446545Putative threonyl-tRNA synthetase14.192.91.25 × 10-6
115439267Met-tRNAi formyl transferase-like20.762.82.49 × 10-3
115465593Translation initiation factor IF-214.372.54.04 × 10-2
115463659Putative chloroplast ribosomal protein L130.6242.41.55 × 10-3
11548752660S ribosomal protein L329.3172.11.93 × 10-2
115447385Lysine--tRNA ligase14.591.54.36 × 10-2
115488928Tryptophanyl-tRNA synthetase21.870.54.03 × 10-2
11545387740S ribosomal protein S344.7140.52.32 × 10-3
11548710440S ribosomal protein S1627.560.41.16 × 10-2
115434960Putative tRNA-glutamine synthetase11.280.37.99 × 10-3
115473889Elongation factor 1-beta39.7210.31.27 × 10-2
11548617940S ribosomal protein S926.260.32.61 × 10-3
115475427Putative 60S ribosomal protein L722.590.22.22 × 10-2
Protein folding
115444001Putative uncharacterized protein P0576F08.3116.7622.91.64 × 10-4
115458444GrpE protein homolog26.6918.21.12 × 10-2
115476198Putative peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase, chloroplast34.32114.95.61 × 10-5
115449059Putative 20 kDa chaperonin, chloroplast46.398.21.49 × 10-2
115461585Peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase39.2237.73.33 × 10-3
115460872OSJNBb0079B02.1 protein4.636.12.96 × 10-2
115467746Trigger factor-like39.5274.81.77 × 10-4
115472829Putative peptidyl-proly cis-trans isomerase protein29.2204.75.14 × 10-5
115448437Putative protease IV14.5104.76.37 × 10-3
115472151Peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase23.354.64.48 × 10-2
11548816060 kDa chaperonin alpha subunit55.5643.85.70 × 10-5
115473507Receptor protein kinase11.783.81.55 × 10-2
115466004Putative chaperonin 60 beta48.2633.71.65 × 10-3
115475740Putative uncharacterized protein OSJNBb0075O18.11423.263.66.47 × 10-3
115465267Serine/threonine-protein kinase SNT713.683.41.46 × 10-2
115448713Peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase34.3113.18.95 × 10-4
115484731ABC-1 domain containing protein9.072.91.57 × 10-2
115441683ABC1-like5.332.84.11 × 10-2
115477014Putative heat-shock protein21.0172.51.11 × 10-2
115463261Putative DnaJ protein25.3142.54.82 × 10-3
11548799870 kDa heat shock protein45.4602.31.13 × 10-2
115469982Endoplasmin homolog precursor26.7280.51.62 × 10-2
115456045T-complex protein 1, theta subunit34.1170.41.77 × 10-2
115462083Chaperonin protein19.4110.33.37 × 10-2
115471369Calreticulin19.890.21.11 × 10-2
115477393Putative 70 kDa peptidylprolyl isomerase15.390.23.70 × 10-4
115468394T-complex protein 1 subunit gamma21.3120.21.36 × 10-3
115458184Calnexin26.6150.24.69 × 10-4
Monosaccharide metabolism
115458768Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase63.412022.51.98 × 10-4
115484401Fructose-bisphosphate aldolase, chloroplastic74.012622.14.10 × 10-7
115468886Fructose-bisphosphate aldolase57.34920.58.04 × 10-7
115455637Malate dehydrogenase67.03512.68.32 × 10-4
115450493Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase57.2917.72.32 × 10-5
115466256Putative enolase46.0327.31.48 × 10-2
115470849Putative ribose-5-phosphate isomerase52.5325.61.19 × 10-2
115477891PfkB type carbohydrate kinase protein family-like12.145.31.34 × 10-2
115434516Triosephosphate isomerase, cytosolic69.2295.04.75 × 10-2
115462281Fructose-6-phosphate 2-kinase/fructose-2,6-bisphosphatase22.9205.08.62 × 10-8
115479643Glucose-6-phosphate isomerase29.9194.83.56 × 10-4
115457638OSJNBa0023J03.8 protein31.384.52.00 × 10-2
1154551334-hydroxy-3-methylbut-2-enyl diphosphate reductase, chloroplastic35.9193.57.98 × 10-4
115437808Oxidoreductase-like24.382.33.35 × 10-2
115464965Hexokinase-524.1102.22.59 × 10-2
115439869Hexokinase-627.1142.11.22 × 10-2
115452337L-ascorbate peroxidase 1, cytosolic49.2290.49.02 × 10-3
115467370Putative pyrophosphate-dependent phosphofructokinase beta subunit31.2170.49.90 × 10-3
115484175Pyruvate kinase31.3230.32.35 × 10-2
1154659746-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase, decarboxylating 144.8290.36.70 × 10-7
115434198Fructose-bisphosphate aldolase24.5100.31.53 × 10-2
115441963Putative transaldolase42.6220.22.29 × 10-3
115473973Xylose isomerase34.5170.21.06 × 10-5
Disaccharide metabolism
115439937Putative trehalose-6-phosphate synthase/phosphatase5.054.12.00 × 10-2
115452927Sucrose synthase 49.490.51.24 × 10-2
115466896Sucrose synthase 236.1320.41.10 × 10-3
115453437Sucrose synthase 143.3360.12.55 × 10-5
Polysaccharide metabolism
115471703Granule binding starch synthase II22.21425.67.88 × 10-5
115474235Putative uncharacterized protein P0034A04.101-126.43017.45.07 × 10-5
115451283Inositol-3-phosphate synthase23.7119.24.04 × 10-5
115476014Glucose-1-phosphate adenylyltransferase small subunit, chloroplastic/amyloplastic36.1236.47.94 × 10-3
115455167Glucose-1-phosphate adenylyltransferase42.7304.44.71 × 10-8
115460666Soluble starch synthase III-111.5163.83.09 × 10-2
115461086Probable UDP-arabinopyranose mutase 210.740.31.00 × 10-2
1154700601,4-alpha-glucan-branching enzyme, chloroplastic/amyloplastic7.360.11.93 × 10-3
115454033UDP-arabinopyranose mutase 152.2240.11.53 × 10-6
115459168Chitinase 411.830.11.53 × 10-2
Fatty acid metabolism
115444801Lipoxygenase16.31217.14.99 × 10-6
115489048Lipoxygenase17.6157.07.04 × 10-3
115441871Acyl-[acyl-carrier-protein] desaturase 2, chloroplastic11.544.61.66 × 10-2
115436430Putative tetrafunctional protein of glyoxysomal fatty acid beta-oxidation17.3130.32.76 × 10-4
115445513Peroxisomal fatty acid beta-oxidation multifunctional protein21.9180.17.07 × 10-8
Amino acid metabolism
115455221Serine hydroxymethyltransferase57.17322.14.47 × 10-12
115461066Glutamine synthetase, chloroplastic61.06920.15.47 × 10-4
115460656Aminomethyltransferase57.15119.84.34 × 10-5
115442595Cysteine synthase51.36014.61.19 × 10-4
115439533Glycine dehydrogenase P protein60.815712.81.08 × 10-4
115457070Cysteine synthase43.0189.73.31 × 10-5
115478398Aspartate kinase-homoserine dehydrogenase10.9115.82.85 × 10-3
115476972Putative 3-deoxy-D-arabino-heptulosonate 7-phosphate synthase23.6125.22.76 × 10-4
115433966Os01g0101200 protein19.0103.12.48 × 10-2
115480417Putative dehydroquinate synthase37.9202.87.39 × 10-3
115450561ATP phosphoribosyltransferase, chloroplastic22.8102.71.57 × 10-2
115448201Carbamoyl-phosphate synthase small chain, chloroplastic20.792.74.08 × 10-2
115445929Probable diaminopimelate decarboxylase, chloroplastic30.4142.52.14 × 10-3
115486343Phosphoserine phosphatase17.642.54.98 × 10-2
115468570Cysteine synthase11.252.34.85 × 10-2
115482324Glutamine synthetase family4.940.63.26 × 10-2
115461214Methylthioribose kinase 114.260.44.30 × 10-2
115449517Glutathione reductase, cytosolic20.890.42.44 × 10-2
115456165Probable methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase36.4240.49.95 × 10-6
1154662263-phosphoshikimate 1-carboxyvinyltransferase22.7120.43.98 × 10-2
115434790Phospholipase D alpha 128.5230.36.75 × 10-4
115454997Glutamate decarboxylase22.4100.37.16 × 10-3
115447403Phenylalanine ammonia-lyase45.6360.12.39 × 10-2
Generation of precursor metabolites and energy
115472339Putative ATP synthase gamma chain 1, chloroplast44.47024.91.72 × 10-9
115472727Cytochrome b6-f complex iron-sulfur subunit, chloroplastic56.03723.11.34 × 10-4
115457390ATP synthase B chain50.32311.72.97 × 10-3
115435200Putative phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase 129.0347.41.51 × 10-4
115452259ATP synthase B chain, chloroplast34.6305.88.67 × 10-4
115448701Putative H(+)-transporting ATP synthase26.3255.18.73 × 10-4
115469362Putative vacuolar proton-ATPase43.4360.61.69 × 10-2
115435934NAD-dependent isocitrate dehydrogenase a29.3110.63.96 × 10-2
115474559Succinate dehydrogenase [ubiquinone] iron-sulfur subunit, mitochondrial24.980.51.16 × 10-2
115438975Putative H + -exporting ATPase40.0110.56.50 × 10-3
115444791Citrate synthase26.9130.42.19 × 10-3
115447367Succinyl-CoA ligase [ADP-forming] subunit beta, mitochondrial31.0140.31.77 × 10-2
115470583Ferredoxin--NADP reductase, embryo isozyme, chloroplastic16.460.35.45 × 10-3
115470493Succinate dehydrogenase [ubiquinone] flavoprotein subunit, mitochondrial13.290.22.91 × 10-3
115469332Glutaredoxin-C836.430.14.59 × 10-2
115459340Glutaredoxin-C643.870.19.69 × 10-3
115470941Thioredoxin H140.2110.17.29 × 10-3
Vitamin metabolism
115472485Thiamine thiazole synthase, chloroplastic49.8296.75.04 × 10-3
115454593Thiamine biosynthesis protein thiC25.7145.43.81 × 10-7
115446113Riboflavin biosynthesis protein RibD family protein9.243.91.81 × 10-2
115482032GDP-mannose 3,5-epimerase 142.6262.74.02 × 10-2
Nucleotide metabolism
115475007Putative uncharacterized protein OJ1590_E05.35-110.549.57.33 × 10-3
115455473WRKY DNA binding domain containing protein4.955.11.59 × 10-2
115450117(RAP Annotation release2) Formyltetrahydrofolate deformylase family protein13.244.21.28 × 10-2
115462253Probable GTP diphosphokinase CRSH2, chloroplastic15.793.84.78 × 10-2
115480339Deoxyribodipyrimidine photolyase family protein-like8.563.51.70 × 10-2
115488968Nucleoside diphosphate kinase31.8113.39.20 × 10-3
115454773Adenylosuccinate synthetase 2, chloroplastic34.0213.18.43 × 10-4
115464251Putative uracil phosphoribosyltransferase28.993.07.42 × 10-4
115451155SAP-like protein13.142.94.14 × 10-2
Isoprenoid metabolism
115472641Putative isopentenyl pyrophosphate:dimethyllallyl pyrophosphate isomerase12.6315.67.33 × 10-3
1154471714-Hydroxy-3-methylbut-2-en-1-yl diphosphate synthase, chloroplastic28.2219.21.37 × 10-8
115471093Zeta-carotene desaturase26.8187.94.21 × 10-6
115458652Zeaxanthin epoxidase, chloroplastic16.2105.93.86 × 10-5
1154340441-Deoxy-D-xylulose 5-phosphate reductoisomerase, chloroplastic24.7154.53.59 × 10-2
115451171Phytoene dehydrogenase, chloroplastic/chromoplastic15.492.82.84 × 10-2
Phosphorus metabolism
115463815Pyruvate, phosphate dikinase 1, chloroplastic40.4517.41.85 × 10-11
115448919Chloroplast inorganic pyrophosphatase42.2196.32.57 × 10-2
115488252Phosphoglucan, water dikinase, chloroplastic12.9153.82.37 × 10-6
115468200Alpha-glucan water dikinase13.0183.08.67 × 10-5
Sulfur metabolism
115456862ATP sulfurylase55.6177.02.17 × 10-3
115472303Probable 5′-adenylylsulfate reductase 1, chloroplastic20.6113.95.43 × 10-4
115450913Glutathione reductase, chloroplast31.0203.31.25 × 10-3
Macromolecule catabolic process
11544493726S proteasome regulatory particle triple-A ATPase subunit 630.9160.43.81 × 10-3
115466690Putative 26S proteasome regulatory particle triple-A ATPase subunit 5a20.3120.22.09 × 10-3
Response to reactive oxygen species
115446663Probable L-ascorbate peroxidase 8, chloroplastic27.2316.72.50 × 10-2
115450521Catalase47.2386.21.09 × 10-2
115477837Superoxide dismutase [Cu-Zn], chloroplastic54.0285.41.30 × 10-2
115473833Thioredoxin reductase NTRC33.0124.41.38 × 10-5
115477687L-Ascorbate peroxidase34.4243.21.48 × 10-2
Cofactor metabolism
115479433Formate-tetrahydrofolate ligase29.4253.04.12 × 10-3
115440827ABC transporter subunit-like13.282.71.62 × 10-2
115434288Putative SufD18.192.64.64 × 10-2
Regulation of nitrogen utilization
115477733Putative NADPH-dependent reductase41.2187.42.14 × 10-7
115445203Putative UOS130.3196.91.72 × 10-6
115469824Putative UOS123.3135.56.31 × 10-4
115453029Divinyl chlorophyllide a 8-vinyl-reductase, chloroplastic24.2114.66.54 × 10-3
Cellular homeostasis
115472057Thioredoxin-like protein CDSP32, chloroplastic29.91310.12.89 × 10-5
115444771Peroxiredoxin-2E-2, chloroplastic63.1347.76.91 × 10-5
115466906Peroxiredoxin Q, chloroplastic45.2227.65.32 × 10-4
1154465412-Cys peroxiredoxin BAS1, chloroplastic56.3365.23.44 × 10-3
115477793Putative auxin-regulated protein32.8134.53.11 × 10-2
115436320Dihydrolipoyl dehydrogenase56.3473.94.04 × 10-5
115435536Peptide transporter protein-like10.732.81.39 × 10-2
115471449Putative uncharacterized protein OJ1370_E02.12639.3101.82.24 × 10-2
115464793Thioredoxin14.930.53.06 × 10-2
115479475Protein disulfide isomerase-like 2-315.750.32.01 × 10-2
115462193Protein disulfide isomerase-like 2-117.260.31.99 × 10-3
115455973Thioredoxin H2-214.220.23.38 × 10-2
115484585Protein disulfide isomerase-like 1-128.1200.19.78 × 10-8
Oxidation reduction
115484891Rieske [2Fe-2S] domain35.01813.73.63 × 10-5
115459670NAD(P)H-quinone oxidoreductase subunit M, chloroplastic39.11411.56.11 × 10-3
115481490Flavonoid 3′-hydroxylase6.137.83.64 × 10-2
115476190Putative oxidoreductase, zinc-binding51.0346.63.97 × 10-6
115476820Nitrate reductase [NADH] 16.356.01.29 × 10-2
115477461Moco containing protein34.5135.11.02 × 10-3
115482950Aldo/keto reductase family protein9.335.12.94 × 10-3
115454109Oxidoreductase, aldo/keto reductase family protein38.5164.92.69 × 10-4
115476618Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase36.5294.78.09 × 10-3
115443657Putative ferredoxin-NADP(H) oxidoreductase55.1514.32.52 × 10-3
115484125L-galactono-1,4-lactone dehydrogenase 1, mitochondrial6.733.91.56 × 10-3
115446723Glucose/ribitol dehydrogenase family protein19.142.61.50 × 10-2
115477843Putative malate dehydrogenase [NADP], chloroplast21.5132.51.35 × 10-2
115438082Cytosolic aldehyde dehydrogenase21.5112.14.10 × 10-2
115487892NADP-dependent oxidoreductase P217.961.82.31 × 10-2
115456131Putative alcohol dehydrogenase26.760.64.09 × 10-2
115443911NADPH-dependent mannose 6-phosphate reductase26.9120.61.66 × 10-2
115482810Malic enzyme20.2110.52.47 × 10-3
115460254OSJNBa0009P12.34 protein12.440.51.82 × 10-2
115478070Putative NADPH-dependent retinol dehydrogenase/reductase26.180.43.40 × 10-2
115484519Aldehyde dehydrogenase12.050.47.24 × 10-3
115479375Aldehyde dehydrogenase29.9150.46.28 × 10-3
115463191Superoxide dismutase [Mn], mitochondrial32.9130.33.01 × 10-2
115464645Hypothetical protein5.730.33.11 × 10-2
115434810NADH-cytochrome b5 reductase22.870.32.15 × 10-2
115451245Oxidoreductase, zinc-binding dehydrogenase family protein16.150.31.48 × 10-2
115478148Isopenicillin N synthase family protein5.220.27.89 × 10-3
115462115Putative 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate oxidase11.030.21.34 × 10-2
Response to oxidative stress
115445243Class III peroxidase 2938.92039.83.19 × 10-3
115460338Haem peroxidase family protein32.9204.54.36 × 10-5
115436084Class III peroxidase 1126.284.42.78 × 10-2
115474059Peroxidase47.0190.31.30 × 10-2
115436300Class III peroxidase 1623.1100.32.50 × 10-2
115456523Salt tolerance protein27.570.25.25 × 10-4
115459848Glutathione peroxidase33.9100.24.64 × 10-2
115442403Putative peroxidase37.9190.13.85 × 10-4
Others
115450080Cell division inhibitor-like20.9145.42.53 × 10-2
115450329Peroxisomal membrane protein 11-121.954.82.94 × 10-2
115452321Ribosomal protein L10 containing protein50.9154.13.30 × 10-4
115439157Two pore calcium channel protein 12.013.83.56 × 10-2
115457630Phototropin-217.0122.91.21 × 10-4
115474273Phosphoinositide phospholipase C27.3150.54.60 × 10-2
115446411RNA binding protein Rp12029.6290.51.61 × 10-2
115448225GTPase activating protein-like5.240.35.92 × 10-3
115453079Villin-320.7170.35.15 × 10-3
115451401Mitochondrial outer membrane protein porin 549.1210.34.79 × 10-3
115441759Dolichyl-diphosphooligosaccharide--protein glycosyltransferase subunit 210.360.31.12 × 10-4
297601526Probable linoleate 9S-lipoxygenase 422.4150.22.78 × 10-3
115434036Putative isoflavone reductase19.850.21.38 × 10-2
115486998Non-specific lipid-transfer protein 2B57.3170.14.26 × 10-3
115444635Response regulator2.130.022.08 × 10-2

Note: “Peptides (95 %)” indicates distinct peptides were identified with at least 95 % confidence (protein score cutoff > 1.5); “Cov (95)” means percentage of matching amino acids from identified peptides with confidence over 95 %; Ratio and P-value represents tag labeled for mock leaves: tag labeled for RSV-infected leaves. Ratio >1.5 is considered as downregulated and <0.67 is upregulated

Differentially accumulated proteins between mock-inoculated leaves and RSV-infected leaves Note: “Peptides (95 %)” indicates distinct peptides were identified with at least 95 % confidence (protein score cutoff > 1.5); “Cov (95)” means percentage of matching amino acids from identified peptides with confidence over 95 %; Ratio and P-value represents tag labeled for mock leaves: tag labeled for RSV-infected leaves. Ratio >1.5 is considered as downregulated and <0.67 is upregulated

Chloroplast group

The 30 annotated significantly downregulated proteins in the chloroplast group process were involved in chlorophyll biosynthesis and photosynthesis (Table 2). For chlorophyll biosynthesis, 10 proteins involved in the chlorophyll contents in RSV-infected leaves were more than 3 times lower than in the mock leaves: magnesium chelatase subunit I (CHLI) and subunit D (CHLD), magnesium-protoporphyrin IX monomethyl ester [oxidative] cyclase, uroporphyrinogen decarboxylase 1, uroporphyrinogen decarboxylase 2, protoporphyrinogen oxidase, porphobilinogen deaminase, delta-aminolevulinic acid dehydratase, glutamate-1-semialdehyde 2,1-aminomutase, glutamyl-tRNA reductase (Table 2; Fig. 5). Twenty photosynthesis proteins were also annotated as enriched, whereas four oxygen-evolving enhancer proteins and a type protein involved in the chloroplast biosynthesis were over 10 times lower upon RSV infection than those in the mock control. Meanwhile, five chlorophyll a/b-binding proteins were downregulated in RSV-infected leaves compared with mock leaves (Table 2). Thus, the accumulation of 30 proteins in the chlorophyll metabolism was apparently reduced by RSV infection.
Fig. 5

a Enzymes of chlorophyll biosynthetic pathway that decreased in accumulation during RSV infection. Selected steps are from KEGG pathways map (map 00860) for metabolism and enzymes. Bold words represent enzymes: glutamyl-tRNA synthetase, uroporphyrinogen III synthase, Mg-protoporphyrin IX methyltransferase, coproporphyrinogen III oxidase; boxed words represent enzymes: glutamyl-tRNA reductase, glutamate-1-semialdehyde aminotransferase, delta-aminolevulinic acid dehydratase, porphobillinogen deaminase, Mg-protoporphyrin IX monomethyl ester oxidative cyclase, magnesium-chelatase, protoporphyrinogen IX oxidase, uroporphyrinogen III decarboxylase. Eight enzymes at first stage of chlorophyll biosynthetic process were found and comprised 10 differentially accumulated proteins that were identified in RSV-induced leaves compared with the mock control leaves. b Two pathways could lead to programmed cell death including normal and RSV-induced plant. OsAP25 (radc1, Os03g0186900), OsAP37, rap, and p0026h03.19 were aspartic proteases genes

a Enzymes of chlorophyll biosynthetic pathway that decreased in accumulation during RSV infection. Selected steps are from KEGG pathways map (map 00860) for metabolism and enzymes. Bold words represent enzymes: glutamyl-tRNA synthetase, uroporphyrinogen III synthase, Mg-protoporphyrin IX methyltransferase, coproporphyrinogen III oxidase; boxed words represent enzymes: glutamyl-tRNA reductase, glutamate-1-semialdehyde aminotransferase, delta-aminolevulinic acid dehydratase, porphobillinogen deaminase, Mg-protoporphyrin IX monomethyl ester oxidative cyclase, magnesium-chelatase, protoporphyrinogen IX oxidase, uroporphyrinogen III decarboxylase. Eight enzymes at first stage of chlorophyll biosynthetic process were found and comprised 10 differentially accumulated proteins that were identified in RSV-induced leaves compared with the mock control leaves. b Two pathways could lead to programmed cell death including normal and RSV-induced plant. OsAP25 (radc1, Os03g0186900), OsAP37, rap, and p0026h03.19 were aspartic proteases genes

Defense group

Leaves are the primary tissue for RSV infection and colonization, so not surprisingly, four defensive proteins in RSV-infected leaves were identified as being altered in accumulation. Three pathogenesis-related proteins and a Bet v 1 allergen family protein were significantly more abundant in RSV-infected leaves than those in mock leaves: pathogenesis-related protein 1, pathogenesis-related protein 10, pathogenesis-related protein and Bet v I allergen family protein (Table 2). The upregulation of those proteins indicated that defensive reactions were induced after inoculation with RSV. From the 70 kDa heat shock protein (HSP70) family, ubiquitous in plants in response to diverse DNA and RNA viruses [39, 40], HSP70 and HSP (putative heat shock protein) were expressed at high levels in RSV-infected leaves compared with mock leaves, indicating that RSV activates the expression of the genes encoding HSP. In addition, superoxide dismutase [Mn] and four peroxidases expressed were upregulated in response to RSV (Table 2). Of 28 annotated proteins involved in proteolysis, 19 proteins increased in response to RSV infection: 7 proteasome subunits, 3 ubiquitin type proteins, 3 aspartic type proteins, 2 aminopeptidase M1 subunits, 1 DNA-binding protein, 1 leukotriene A-4 hydrolase,1 serine carboxypeptidase and 1 insulin degrading enzyme. Three aspartic type proteins (eukaryotic aspartyl protease family protein, aspartic proteinase and peptidase aspartic) were expressed at a high level in the RSV-infected leaves (Table 2).

Validation of changes in RNA level by RT-qPCR and Northern blotting

Based on a proteomics analysis, the proteins differentially accumulated during RSV infection, key proteins for chlorophyll biosynthesis and an aspartic-type endopeptidase were identified as involved in the formation of RSV induced symptoms, and their presence was quantitatively confirmed using RT-qPCR and Northern blot to evaluate the correlation between mRNA and protein levels. Total RNA extracted from RSV-infected and mock leaves was analyzed to measure mRNA transcription levels of putative target proteins. The RT-qPCR results demonstrated that expression of the genes for CHLI and CHLD (magnesium chelatase) in RSV-infected leaves was downregulated more than three times the level of the control (Fig. 6a), and transcription of genes encoding radc1, rap and p0026h03.19 in RSV-infected leaves were upregulated 14, 2, 3 times higher than the level of the control leaves, respectively (Fig. 6a), verifying the iTRAQ results. Similarly, this trend for mRNA levels of the genes for CHLI and p0026h03.19 by Northern blotting analyses also supported the transcription of genes encoding respective protein by RT-qPCR (Fig. 6b). Whereas, elevated levels of five genes were different between transcription and proteins levels that may be due to posttranscription and posttranslational regulatory processes.
Fig. 6

Validation of rice gene expression levels by real time RT-PCR and Northern blotting. a Comparison of protein and mRNA expression levels of mock leaves and RSV-infected leaves using RT-qPCR. Blue represents mock leaves; red represents RSV-infected leaves. The averaged readings from the three biological replicates normalized against endogenous gene OsEF1α; error bar denoted SD. Statistics were analyzed using the Student’s t-test. An asterisk indicated a significant difference from the corresponding control (P < 0.01). b Northern blot of two differentially expressed genes selected for verifying RT-qPCR results. Mock, mock-inoculated leaves; RSV-infected, RSV-infected leaves. Equal loading of total RNA was assessed by staining rRNA with ethidium bromide. Marker contained 2000 bp, 1500 bp, 1000 bp and 750 bp

Validation of rice gene expression levels by real time RT-PCR and Northern blotting. a Comparison of protein and mRNA expression levels of mock leaves and RSV-infected leaves using RT-qPCR. Blue represents mock leaves; red represents RSV-infected leaves. The averaged readings from the three biological replicates normalized against endogenous gene OsEF1α; error bar denoted SD. Statistics were analyzed using the Student’s t-test. An asterisk indicated a significant difference from the corresponding control (P < 0.01). b Northern blot of two differentially expressed genes selected for verifying RT-qPCR results. Mock, mock-inoculated leaves; RSV-infected, RSV-infected leaves. Equal loading of total RNA was assessed by staining rRNA with ethidium bromide. Marker contained 2000 bp, 1500 bp, 1000 bp and 750 bp

Discussion

In the present study, iTRAQ-based experiments were implemented to identify proteins that were differentially accumulated between the RSV-infected and mock-inoculated leaves, then to determine which proteins may be involved in symptom formation. During RSV infection, 681 differentially accumulated proteins were found (Fig. 2; Table 1); 492 of these proteins were annotated by GO and located mostly in plastids, including the chloroplast, and participating in chlorophyll metabolism (Fig. 3, 4; Table 2). Chloroplast proteins was degraded by chloroplast vesiculation [41]. Upon RSV infection, the chloroplast vesiculation possibly targeted and destabilized the chloroplast for protein degradation, which resulted in cell death and induced the formation of vesicle containing many plastid proteins. According to the String database, protein-protein interaction networks were clustered in the chloroplast, defensive and metabolism groups (Additional file 2: Figure S1). Based on the functional analysis and RSV-induced disease symptoms, several proteins were associated with leaf chlorosis, cell death and plant defense during RSV invasion (Fig. 1, 3, 4). Additionally, the transcription of genes encoding selected proteins using RT-qPCR and Northern blot analyses matched with iTRAQ results (Fig. 6). We will discuss these various changes in proteins with regard to their significance to disease symptoms.

RSV induced a decrease in chlorophyll

At 21 dpi, chlorotic stripes on newly emerged leaves are typical on rice plants infected by RSV (Fig. 1). Chlorosis is correlated with a reduction in chlorophyll during infection with a virus [11]. Recently, chlorophyll structure was also confirmed to be altered by accumulation of RSV SP, and PsbP (oxygen-evolving complex protein) was shown to participate in the interaction between rice and RSV [16]. Similarly, we used iTRAQ to determine that the accumulation of four oxygen-evolving enhancer proteins in RSV-induced leaves was lower than in the control plants (Table 2); thus, reduced accumulation of oxygen-evolving enhancer protein is involved in interrupting chlorophyll production. Chlorophyll production is also influenced independently by chlorophyll anabolic and catabolic reactions [42]. Here, eight enzymes involved in early steps of chlorophyll biosynthesis were identified as being lower in RSV-infected leaves than in the mock-inoculated leaves (Fig. 5a; Table 2), again implicating RSV infection in significantly inhibiting chlorophyll biosynthesis. One of these eight, magnesium chelatase, comprising three subunits (CHLI, CHLD, CHLH), is an important synthetic enzyme for chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b [43]. Specifically, subunits CHLI and CHLD were downregulated in RSV-infected leaves (Table 2, Fig. 3a) and had decreased mRNA levels (Fig. 6) compared with the control. These subunits are AAA+ proteins (ATPases associated with various cellular activities) and form a motor unit, which provides a structure for the functioning of magnesium chelatase [44, 45]. The reduced accumulation of CHLI and CHLD thus indicates that the function of magnesium chelatase in chlorophyll biosynthesis is also limited. These results suggest that the reduction of chlorophyll is associated with downregulation of magnesium chelatase during infection with RSV. Previous studies of CMV have shown that the yellow mosaic symptoms are induced by a domain of satellite RNA [46, 47]. Recently, small interfering RNA (siRNA) derived from this domain of satellite RNA was shown to mediate RNA silencing of the chlorophyll biosynthetic gene CHLI (magnesium protoporphyrin cheltase subunit I) and that CHLI mRNA is downregulated in the infected tobacco [12, 13]. The yellowing domain of CMV satellite RNA induces RNA silencing of chlorophyll biosynthetic gene by small interfering RNA [12, 13]. Unlike CMV, RSV does not have satellite RNA; so how does RSV regulate and alter the chlorophyll biosynthetic pathway and induce chlorosis? In addition, a reduction of chlorophyll a/b-binding protein was shown to cause a downregulation of chlorophyll accumulation [14]. Here, the level of five chlorophyll a/b-binding proteins was reduced during RSV infection (Table 2). Therefore, RSV infection disrupts chlorophyll biosynthesis.

Proteases coincided with cell death

The ubiquitin-26S proteasome system targets intercellular regulators that have a central role in battling pathogens [48-51] and in leaf senescence [52]. Several of the 26S proteasome units rose in accumulation in RSV-infected leaves compared with mock leaves (Table 2), suggesting it might promote host defense, then induce cell death in rice to restrict pathogen spread. At the end stage of RSV infection, rice leaves developed chlorotic stripes, then the whole leaf died (Fig. 1b). Cell death requires a series of appropriate proteases. For example, over-expression of OsAP25 (Os03g0186900) and OsAP37 encoding aspartic proteases induces programmed cell death [18]. Similarly, in this study aspartic proteases encoded by radc1 (Os03g0186900), rap, and p0026h03.19 in RSV-infected leaves were sharply upregulated compared with the control leaves (Figs. 4 and 5b), indicating that the expression of the genes encoding aspartic protease was induced by RSV infection and participated in programmed cell death. However, we found that the aspartic protease pathway in RSV-infected leaves contained three proteins (radc1, rap, and p0026h03.19) that differed from the aspartic proteases (OsAP25 and OsAP37) in the normal plant. The aspartic protease pathway induced by a pathogen might thus be a new biological process.

Defense reaction during RSV infection

Pathogenesis-related protein is associated with systemic acquired resistance of plant against diverse pathogens [53]. RSV infection induced a plant defense response, as noted by the upregulation of the expression of the genes encoding rice pathogenesis-related proteins. Bet v1 allergen, a member of the ubiquitous family of pathogenesis-related plant proteins, acts as a plant steroid carrier and has ribonuclease activity, suggesting it might play a key role in the plant defense response against pathogens [54-56]. In RSV-infected leaves, three pathogenesis-related proteins belonging to the Bet v1 allergen family of proteins (OSJNBb0048E02.12) accumulated at a higher level than in mock leaves (Table 2). So the upregulation of Bet v1 allergen family proteins might improve the transport of a steroid such as a brassinosteroid and enhance ribonuclease activities against virus infection. In addition, the heat-shock protein HSP70 was more abundant in the RSV-infected leaves than in mock leaves (Table 2); thus RSV can induce HSP70 accumulation, as can various other RNA and DNA viruses [39, 40]. The expression of the genes encoding superoxide dismutase [Mn], superoxide dismutase [Cu-Zn] and peroxidase was also altered in response to RSV invasion (Table 2). Superoxide dismutase and peroxidase in plant were also identified as upregulated in response to TMV infection [57]. However, superoxide dismutase [Cu-Zn] was identified as downregulated during Sugarcane mosaic virus infection, showing that the regulation of superoxide dismutase can differ depending on the virus [58]. RSV infection thus clearly activated the accumulation of rice defense-related proteins, similar to the defense-related proteins such as PR10, HSP70 and peroxidase induced in rice infected by Rice yellow mottle virus (RYMV) that were identified using the 2-D method [59].

Conclusions

In summary, comparative proteomics analysis using iTRAQ LC-MS/MS technology identified 448 downregulated proteins and 233 upregulated proteins in many metabolic pathways during RSV infection. Several pathways potentially involved in RSV-induced symptom were found, including chlorophyll biosynthesis, proteolysis and defense response. Although our investigation provides knowledge of key proteins associated with the RSV-induced symptom, gene function analysis is needed to further understand the roles of these proteins in symptom formation. Therefore, our findings may provide new clues for elucidating the molecular mechanisms underlying RSV-induced symptom formation.

Methods

Insect population, plant materials and inoculation

A SBPH (small brown planthopper) population was maintained on susceptible rice (Oryza sativa var. japonica) cultivar (cv.) Wuyujing 3 in a climate chamber at 26 °C and a photoperiod of 14 h light and 10 h dark [60]. Third instar SBPH nymphs were allowed to feed on RSV-infected rice plants for a 3-day acquisition access period (AAP), then maintained in the climate chamber through the 10-day latent period. Ten viruliferous SBPH were then allowed to feed for a 2-day inoculation access period on three-leaved seedlings of Oryza sativa cv. Aichiasahi that had been grown in plastic pots containing a greenhouse soil mixture (40 % soil, 30 % vermiculite, 30 % straw powder). Subsequently, seedlings infested with non-viruliferous SBPH were used in the same way as a mock control. After the inoculation access period, seedlings were sprayed with insecticide and were transferred to insect-free greenhouse at 28 °C to observe symptom formation daily.

Sampling and RT-PCR (reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction)

Samples were collected from both RSV-infected leaves and mock leaves at 21 dpi and immediately immersed in liquid nitrogen. Total RNA was extracted using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen Trading, Shanghai, China). M-MLV reverse transcriptase (Promega, Madison, USA) was used to reverse-transcribe 2 μg of the total RNA with gene-specific primers (Additional file 1: Table S1). PCR was performed in a final volume of 50 μL at 95 °C for 5 min, 32 cycles of 95 °C for 30 s, 57 °C for 45 s, 72 °C for 50 s. Amplified products were fractionated in a 1 % agarose gel.

Protein extraction, digestion and iTRAQ labeling

To extract total proteins from the RSV-infected leaves and control leaves, the samples were homogenized in lysis buffer (7 M urea, 2 M thiourea, 0.1 % CHAPS), and the mixture was then incubated at 30 °C for 30 min, and centrifuged at 15,000 × g for 20 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was collected and the proteins concentration was determined by the Bradford protein assay (Bio-Rad Laboratory, Hercules, CA, USA). Bovine serum albumin (BSA) was performed as the standard for the calibration curve. Approximately 200 μg proteins were reduced with 1 M dithiothreitol, alkylated with 1 M iodoacetamide, dissolved in the dissolution buffer, and digested with trypsin (AB Sciex, Foster City, USA) at 1:50 (w/w) for 37 °C overnight, which were then labeled using the iTRAQ Reagents 4-plex kit (AB Sciex) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The peptides from RSV-infected leaves and mock leaves were labeled with 117 and 116 tags, respectively (Fig. 7).
Fig. 7

Strategy for iTRAQ LC-MS/MS analysis of comparative proteomics in rice infected with Rice stripe virus (RSV). At 21 days after inoculation, mock leaves (inoculated with healthy small brown planthoppers [SBPH]) and RSV-inoculated leaves (inoculated via RSV-viruliferous SBPH) were collected to extract total proteins. After prepared proteins were digested with trypsin, the peptides were labeled with the iTRAQ reagent and pooled. Pooled peptides were fractioned using the reversed-phase HPLC system, then individual fractions were analyzed using LC-MS/MS. MS raw data were processed using the NCBI protein database. Identified proteins were then analyzed using the DAVID platform and STRING software. Finally, key proteins were selected to validate their expression

Strategy for iTRAQ LC-MS/MS analysis of comparative proteomics in rice infected with Rice stripe virus (RSV). At 21 days after inoculation, mock leaves (inoculated with healthy small brown planthoppers [SBPH]) and RSV-inoculated leaves (inoculated via RSV-viruliferous SBPH) were collected to extract total proteins. After prepared proteins were digested with trypsin, the peptides were labeled with the iTRAQ reagent and pooled. Pooled peptides were fractioned using the reversed-phase HPLC system, then individual fractions were analyzed using LC-MS/MS. MS raw data were processed using the NCBI protein database. Identified proteins were then analyzed using the DAVID platform and STRING software. Finally, key proteins were selected to validate their expression

Fractionation by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)

Using the RIGOL L-3000 HPLC Pump system, the iTRAQ-labeled samples were reconstituted with mobile phase A (98 % H2O, 2 % acetonitrile, pH 10 adjusted by ammonia water) and mobile phase B (98 % acetonitrile, 2 % H2O adjusted by ammonia water), then fractionated on a Durashell-C18 column (4.6 mm × 250 mm, 5 μm, 100 Å; Agela, USA) at a speed of 0.7 mL min-1 using the gradient 0-5 min, 5-8 % buffer B; 5-35 min, 8-18 % buffer B; 35-62 min, 18-32 % buffer B; 62-64 min, 32-95 % buffer B; 64-68 min, 95 % buffer B; 68-72 min, 95-5 % buffer B. The chromatograms were recorded at 214 nm.

Mass spectrometric (MS) analysis

The fractionated peptides, dissolved in 2 % methyl alcohol and 0.1 % formic acid were analyzed using an ABI-5600 system (Applied Biosystems). After equilibration of the column with solvent A (100 % H2O, 0.1 % formic acid), the peptides eluted from the column (EASY-Spray column, 12 cm × 75 μm, C18, 3 μm) with a 90-min mobile phase gradient using solvent B (100 % acetonitrile, 0.1 % formic acid) with a flow rate of 350 nL min-1, a spray voltage of 2.1 kV and ionization interface temperature of 250 °C. Scan range was from 350 to 1800 m/z. The charge states of peptides were set to +2 to +4. Proteins were identified and quantified by Protein Pilot Software 4.0 using the NCBI rice protein database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/protein/?term=oryza+sativa) search algorithm (Applied Biosystems). Proteins were identified based on various parameters such as trypsin digestion; dynamic modification; false discovery rate (FDR) determination for all peptide and protein identifications < 1 %; precursor ion mass tolerance, ±15 ppm; fragment ion mass tolerance, ±20 mmu; max missed cleavages, 2. Proteins were quantified as a change in relative expression; proteins with a fold-change >1.5 (P < 0.05) were considered to have decreased in level and those with fold-change <0.67 (P < 0.05) as increased. The Gene Ontology (GO) annotation for functional analysis was done using the DAVID resources 6.7 (http://david.abcc.ncifcrf.gov/) [61], and proteins were classified based on the molecular function, biological process, and cellular components. The Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) (http://www.kegg.jp/) annotation was also done for a pathway analysis [62], and we assessed the interaction network for differentially accumulated proteins using STRING software (http://string-db.org/) [63].

Analysis of gene expression by RT-qPCR (reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction)

RT-qPCR primers were designed by Primer Premier Version 5.0 based on the ORF (open reading frame) sequence of candidate genes cloned from rice (Additional file 1: Table S1), and a primer set for endogenous gene OsEF1α designed for another study [64] was also used. About 2 μg total RNA was reverse-transcribed using the FastQuant RT kit (Tiangen Biotech-Beijing Co.) according to the manufacturer’s instructions and then its concentration was measured by NanaDrop-1000 [65]. The RT-qPCR was done in final volume of 20 μL using the SupperReal PreMix Plus (SYBR Green) kit and the manufacturer’s instructions (Tiangen Biotech-Beijing Co.) in a ABI 7500 Real Time PCR thermal cycler and the following conditions: 95 °C for 15 min; 40 cycles of 95 °C for 10 s, 55 °C for 32 s, and 72 °C for 32 s. The experiment was repeated three times. Data for the melt curve were collected at 95 °C for 15 s, 60 °C for 1 min, 95 °C for 30 s, and 60 °C for 15 s. Relative gene expression was calculated by the 2-ΔΔCT method [66].

Northern blot analysis

Fifteen micrograms of the total RNA extracted was electrophoresed in a 1.5 % formaldehyde agarose gel and transferred to a Hybond-N+ membrane (GE Healthcare Bio-Scienes Corp., USA) [67]. The membrane was then baked at 80 °C for 2 h, then probed with α-32P-dCTP- randomly primer labeled probe at 65 °C overnight in a perfect hyb™ plus hybridization buffer (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, USA). After the hybridization, the membrane was washed twice with 2× SSC (sodium chloride-sodium citrate), 1× SDS (sodium dodecyl sulfate); 1× SSC, 1× SDS and 0.5× SSC, 0.5× SDS at 65 °C, and the radioactive signals were detected using phosphor imaging.
  61 in total

1.  Characterization, cloning, and evolutionary history of the chloroplast and cytosolic class I aldolases of the red alga Galdieria sulphuraria.

Authors:  W Gross; D Lenze; U Nowitzki; J Weiske; C Schnarrenberger
Journal:  Gene       Date:  1999-04-01       Impact factor: 3.688

2.  Addressing accuracy and precision issues in iTRAQ quantitation.

Authors:  Natasha A Karp; Wolfgang Huber; Pawel G Sadowski; Philip D Charles; Svenja V Hester; Kathryn S Lilley
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2010-04-10       Impact factor: 5.911

3.  Localization and distribution of wheat dwarf virus in its vector leafhopper, Psammotettix alienus.

Authors:  Yajiao Wang; Qianzhuo Mao; Wenwen Liu; ThiThi Mar; Taiyun Wei; Yan Liu; Xifeng Wang
Journal:  Phytopathology       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 4.025

4.  Changes in protein abundance during powdery mildew infection of leaf tissues of Cabernet Sauvignon grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.).

Authors:  Ellen Marsh; Sophie Alvarez; Leslie M Hicks; W Brad Barbazuk; Wenping Qiu; Laszlo Kovacs; Daniel Schachtman
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.984

5.  Induction of HSP70 and polyubiquitin expression associated with plant virus replication.

Authors:  M A Aranda; M Escaler; D Wang; A J Maule
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-12-24       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Rice proteomics: a model system for crop improvement and food security.

Authors:  Sun Tae Kim; Sang Gon Kim; Ganesh Kumar Agrawal; Shoshi Kikuchi; Randeep Rakwal
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 3.984

7.  Proteomic analysis of tobacco mosaic virus-infected tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum M.) fruits and detection of viral coat protein.

Authors:  Juan Casado-Vela; Susana Sellés; Roque Bru Martínez
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.984

8.  Tomato bushy stunt virus co-opts the RNA-binding function of a host metabolic enzyme for viral genomic RNA synthesis.

Authors:  Robert Yung-Liang Wang; Peter D Nagy
Journal:  Cell Host Microbe       Date:  2008-03-13       Impact factor: 21.023

9.  Determination of sequence and structural requirements for pathogenicity of a cucumber mosaic virus satellite RNA (Y-satRNA).

Authors:  C Masuta; Y Takanami
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 11.277

10.  Proteomic analysis of interaction between P7-1 of Southern rice black-streaked dwarf virus and the insect vector reveals diverse insect proteins involved in successful transmission.

Authors:  ThiThi Mar; Wenwen Liu; Xifeng Wang
Journal:  J Proteomics       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 4.044

View more
  17 in total

1.  Comprehensive transcriptomics and proteomics analyses of rice stripe virus-resistant transgenic rice.

Authors:  Yang Xu; Lvjie Bi; Zipeng Yu; Chao Lin; Liming Gan; Lifei Zhu; Haiyang Li; Yunzhi Song; Changxiang Zhu
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.826

2.  Differential proteomics profiling of the ova between healthy and Rice stripe virus-infected female insects of Laodelphax striatellus.

Authors:  Beibei Liu; Faliang Qin; Wenwen Liu; Xifeng Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Comparative transcriptome analysis of soybean response to bean pyralid larvae.

Authors:  Weiying Zeng; Zudong Sun; Zhaoyan Cai; Huaizhu Chen; Zhenguang Lai; Shouzhen Yang; Xiangmin Tang
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 3.969

4.  Proteomic analysis of Potentilla fruticosa L. leaves by iTRAQ reveals responses to heat stress.

Authors:  Yingtian Guo; Zhi Wang; Xuelian Guan; Zenghui Hu; Ze Zhang; Jian Zheng; Yizeng Lu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Identifying the Genes Regulated by AtWRKY6 Using Comparative Transcript and Proteomic Analysis under Phosphorus Deficiency.

Authors:  Li-Qin Li; Lu-Ping Huang; Gang Pan; Lun Liu; Xi-Yao Wang; Li-Ming Lu
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  Proteomic analysis by iTRAQ-MRM of soybean resistance to Lamprosema Indicate.

Authors:  Weiying Zeng; Zudong Sun; Zhaoyan Cai; Huaizhu Chen; Zhenguang Lai; Shouzhen Yang; Xiangmin Tang
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 3.969

7.  Proteome Profiling of Paulownia Seedlings Infected with Phytoplasma.

Authors:  Xibing Cao; Guoqiang Fan; Yanpeng Dong; Zhenli Zhao; Minjie Deng; Zhe Wang; Wenshan Liu
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 5.753

8.  Quantitative Proteomics Reveals the Defense Response of Wheat against Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici.

Authors:  Yuheng Yang; Yang Yu; Chaowei Bi; Zhensheng Kang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  Chloroplast in Plant-Virus Interaction.

Authors:  Jinping Zhao; Xian Zhang; Yiguo Hong; Yule Liu
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  Integrative Analysis of the microRNAome and Transcriptome Illuminates the Response of Susceptible Rice Plants to Rice Stripe Virus.

Authors:  Jian Yang; Fen Zhang; Jing Li; Jian-Ping Chen; Heng-Mu Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.