Denise L Smith1, Jacob P DeBlois2, Margaret Wharton3, Patricia C Fehling2, Sushant M Ranadive4. 1. First Responder Health and Safety Laboratory, Department of Health and Exercise Sciences, Skidmore College, 815 N Broadway, Saratoga Springs, NY, 12866, USA. dsmith@skidmore.edu. 2. First Responder Health and Safety Laboratory, Department of Health and Exercise Sciences, Skidmore College, 815 N Broadway, Saratoga Springs, NY, 12866, USA. 3. Saratoga Hospital, 211 Church Street, Saratoga Springs, NY, 12866, USA. 4. Department of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Exercise disrupts the interaction between the left ventricle and the vasculature, as measured by wave intensity (WI) analysis. However, the effect of exercise-induced heat stress on WI amplitude is unknown. WI measures are calibrated using brachial or carotid artery blood pressure, but the influence of calibration method on WI outcomes is unknown. PURPOSE: (1) To compare WI analysis during low and moderate exercise-induced heat stress; (2) to examine differences in carotid WI analysis based on calibration method. METHODS: Eleven healthy, young men (22 ± 3 years) performed intermittent exercise in moderate- and low-heat stress conditions. WI was assessed pre- and post-exercise on the right carotid artery, and calibrated with brachial and carotid blood pressures. RESULTS: A main effect of time was found for W1 when calibrated by brachial, but not carotid pressure. A time-by-condition interaction was observed for late systolic/early diastolic function (W2) in both brachial (p = 0.047) and carotid calibration methods (p = 0.042), where W2 increased following exercise-induced moderate-heat stress but decreased following low-heat stress. The elastic modulus exhibited a significant time-by-condition interaction (brachial p = 0.039; carotid p = 0.044), increasing following moderate-heat stress but decreasing following low-heat stress. Calibrations using carotid blood pressure significantly reduced WI amplitudes compared with brachial calibrations (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Arterial-ventricular coupling is affected in different ways following moderate and low exercise-induced heat stress. Wave amplitudes were lower (~13 %) following carotid calibration compared with brachial.
INTRODUCTION: Exercise disrupts the interaction between the left ventricle and the vasculature, as measured by wave intensity (WI) analysis. However, the effect of exercise-induced heat stress on WI amplitude is unknown. WI measures are calibrated using brachial or carotid artery blood pressure, but the influence of calibration method on WI outcomes is unknown. PURPOSE: (1) To compare WI analysis during low and moderate exercise-induced heat stress; (2) to examine differences in carotid WI analysis based on calibration method. METHODS: Eleven healthy, young men (22 ± 3 years) performed intermittent exercise in moderate- and low-heat stress conditions. WI was assessed pre- and post-exercise on the right carotid artery, and calibrated with brachial and carotid blood pressures. RESULTS: A main effect of time was found for W1 when calibrated by brachial, but not carotid pressure. A time-by-condition interaction was observed for late systolic/early diastolic function (W2) in both brachial (p = 0.047) and carotid calibration methods (p = 0.042), where W2 increased following exercise-induced moderate-heat stress but decreased following low-heat stress. The elastic modulus exhibited a significant time-by-condition interaction (brachial p = 0.039; carotid p = 0.044), increasing following moderate-heat stress but decreasing following low-heat stress. Calibrations using carotid blood pressure significantly reduced WI amplitudes compared with brachial calibrations (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Arterial-ventricular coupling is affected in different ways following moderate and low exercise-induced heat stress. Wave amplitudes were lower (~13 %) following carotid calibration compared with brachial.
Authors: Wesley K Lefferts; Kevin S Heffernan; Eric M Hultquist; Patricia C Fehling; Denise L Smith Journal: Vasc Med Date: 2015-05-04 Impact factor: 3.239
Authors: P C Fehling; J M Haller; W K Lefferts; E M Hultquist; M Wharton; T W Rowland; D L Smith Journal: Occup Med (Lond) Date: 2015-04-13 Impact factor: 1.611
Authors: Denise L Smith; Steven J Petruzzello; Eric Goldstein; Uzma Ahmad; Krishnarao Tangella; Gregory G Freund; Gavin P Horn Journal: Prehosp Emerg Care Date: 2011 Apr-Jun Impact factor: 3.077
Authors: Alessandra Borlotti; Ashraf W Khir; Ernst R Rietzschel; Marc L De Buyzere; Sebastian Vermeersch; Patrick Segers Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2012-06-07
Authors: C A Fahs; L M Rossow; H Yan; S M Ranadive; S Agiovlasitis; K R Wilund; T Baynard; B Fernhall Journal: J Hum Hypertens Date: 2013-02-21 Impact factor: 3.012
Authors: Martin G Schultz; Justin E Davies; Phillip Roberts-Thomson; J Andrew Black; Alun D Hughes; James E Sharman Journal: Hypertension Date: 2013-05-28 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Elizabeth C Lefferts; Alexander J Rosenberg; Georgios Grigoriadis; Sang Ouk Wee; Stephen Kerber; Kenneth W Fent; Gavin P Horn; Denise L Smith; Bo Fernhall Journal: Vasc Med Date: 2021-02-19 Impact factor: 3.239