Literature DB >> 26112209

Seeing is believing: good graphic design principles for medical research.

Susan P Duke1, Fabrice Bancken2, Brenda Crowe3, Mat Soukup4, Taxiarchis Botsis5, Richard Forshee5.   

Abstract

Have you noticed when you browse a book, journal, study report, or product label how your eye is drawn to figures more than to words and tables? Statistical graphs are powerful ways to transparently and succinctly communicate the key points of medical research. Furthermore, the graphic design itself adds to the clarity of the messages in the data. The goal of this paper is to provide a mechanism for selecting the appropriate graph to thoughtfully construct quality deliverables using good graphic design principles. Examples are motivated by the efforts of a Safety Graphics Working Group that consisted of scientists from the pharmaceutical industry, Food and Drug Administration, and academic institutions.
Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Keywords:  communication; graphics; visual perception; visualization

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26112209     DOI: 10.1002/sim.6549

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  9 in total

Review 1.  Graphical Analyses in the Regulatory Evaluation of Gene Therapy Applications.

Authors:  Xue Lin; Shiowjen Lee; John Scott; Min Lin
Journal:  Ther Innov Regul Sci       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 1.778

2.  Visualising harms in publications of randomised controlled trials: consensus and recommendations.

Authors:  Rachel Phillips; Suzie Cro; Graham Wheeler; Simon Bond; Tim P Morris; Siobhan Creanor; Catherine Hewitt; Sharon Love; Andre Lopes; Iryna Schlackow; Carrol Gamble; Graeme MacLennan; Chris Habron; Anthony C Gordon; Nikhil Vergis; Tianjing Li; Riaz Qureshi; Colin C Everett; Jane Holmes; Amanda Kirkham; Clare Peckitt; Sarah Pirrie; Norin Ahmed; Laura Collett; Victoria Cornelius
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2022-05-16

3.  Transparent reporting for reproducible science.

Authors:  Tracey L Weissgerber; Vesna D Garovic; Stacey J Winham; Natasa M Milic; Eric M Prager
Journal:  J Neurosci Res       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 4.164

4.  On Effective Graphic Communication of Health Inequality: Considerations for Health Policy Researchers.

Authors:  Yukiko Asada; Hannah Abel; Chris Skedgel; Grace Warner
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 4.911

5.  Reflecting on Graphs: Attributes of Graph Choice and Construction Practices in Biology.

Authors:  Aakanksha Angra; Stephanie M Gardner
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  Effective Visual Communication for the Quantitative Scientist.

Authors:  Marc Vandemeulebroecke; Mark Baillie; Alison Margolskee; Baldur Magnusson
Journal:  CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol       Date:  2019-08-30

7.  Privacy preserving data visualizations.

Authors:  Demetris Avraam; Rebecca Wilson; Oliver Butters; Thomas Burton; Christos Nicolaides; Elinor Jones; Andy Boyd; Paul Burton
Journal:  EPJ Data Sci       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 3.184

8.  Raw Data Visualization for Common Factorial Designs Using SPSS: A Syntax Collection and Tutorial.

Authors:  Florian Loffing
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-03-30

Review 9.  A critical review of graphics for subgroup analyses in clinical trials.

Authors:  Nicolás M Ballarini; Yi-Da Chiu; Franz König; Martin Posch; Thomas Jaki
Journal:  Pharm Stat       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 1.894

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.