Wei-jie Bei1, Chong-yang Duan2, Ji-yan Chen1, Kun Wang1, Yuan-hui Liu3, Yong Liu3, Ning Tan4. 1. Department of Cardiology, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. 2. Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou Guangdong, China. 3. Department of Cardiology, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China The authors are considered equally as corresponding authors. 4. Department of Cardiology, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China The authors are considered equally as corresponding authors tanning100@126.com lyh0718@126.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: It is uncertain whether remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) has a protective effect on contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)/coronary artery angiography (CAG). We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the effect of RIC on CI-AKI in such patients. METHODS: PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were searched for RCTs that assessed the effect of RIC on CI-AKI in patients undergoing PCI/CAG. RESULTS: Ten RCTs with 1389 patients (RIC group, 757 and control, 632) were included. The RIC group significantly exerted a lower risk of CI-AKI compared to the controls (odds ratio [OR] = 0.52, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.34-0.77, P = .001), and they had the similar effect on major adverse cardiovascular events within 1 year (OR = 0.36, 95% CI = 0.20-0.66, P < .001). The RIC reduced the rates of death within 30 days, but this was not significant (OR = 0.16, 95% CI = 0.02-1.34, P = .091). The RIC was associated with a significantly lower incidence of CI-AKI in patients following elective PCI/CAG (OR = 0.54, 95% CI = 0.33-0.87, P = .011). The RIC before not after the intervention was effective in reducing the occurrence of CI-AKI (OR: 0.37 vs 1.05, P = .022). The RIC of the upper arm has statistically significant effect on protecting CI-AKI but not that of the lower limb (OR: 0.41 vs 1.41, P = .004). The effect of RIC on CI-AKI was similar between patients with a mean estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73 m(2) and those with mean rates ≥60 (OR: 0.23 vs 0.41, P = .333). CONCLUSION: The RIC reduced the incidence of CI-AKI in those receiving PCI/CAG. And RIC of the upper arm significantly reduced the risk of CI-AKI but not RIC of the lower limb in patients undergoing PCI/CAG.
BACKGROUND: It is uncertain whether remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) has a protective effect on contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)/coronary artery angiography (CAG). We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the effect of RIC on CI-AKI in such patients. METHODS: PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were searched for RCTs that assessed the effect of RIC on CI-AKI in patients undergoing PCI/CAG. RESULTS: Ten RCTs with 1389 patients (RIC group, 757 and control, 632) were included. The RIC group significantly exerted a lower risk of CI-AKI compared to the controls (odds ratio [OR] = 0.52, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.34-0.77, P = .001), and they had the similar effect on major adverse cardiovascular events within 1 year (OR = 0.36, 95% CI = 0.20-0.66, P < .001). The RIC reduced the rates of death within 30 days, but this was not significant (OR = 0.16, 95% CI = 0.02-1.34, P = .091). The RIC was associated with a significantly lower incidence of CI-AKI in patients following elective PCI/CAG (OR = 0.54, 95% CI = 0.33-0.87, P = .011). The RIC before not after the intervention was effective in reducing the occurrence of CI-AKI (OR: 0.37 vs 1.05, P = .022). The RIC of the upper arm has statistically significant effect on protecting CI-AKI but not that of the lower limb (OR: 0.41 vs 1.41, P = .004). The effect of RIC on CI-AKI was similar between patients with a mean estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73 m(2) and those with mean rates ≥60 (OR: 0.23 vs 0.41, P = .333). CONCLUSION: The RIC reduced the incidence of CI-AKI in those receiving PCI/CAG. And RIC of the upper arm significantly reduced the risk of CI-AKI but not RIC of the lower limb in patients undergoing PCI/CAG.
Authors: Peter Pickkers; Marlies Ostermann; Michael Joannidis; Alexander Zarbock; Eric Hoste; Rinaldo Bellomo; John Prowle; Michael Darmon; Joseph V Bonventre; Lui Forni; Sean M Bagshaw; Miet Schetz Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2017-01-30 Impact factor: 17.440