Carlos Pérez-Medina1, Jun Tang2, Dalya Abdel-Atti3, Brandon Hogstad4, Miriam Merad4, Edward A Fisher5, Zahi A Fayad6, Jason S Lewis7, Willem J M Mulder8, Thomas Reiner9. 1. Centro de Investigación en Red de Enfermedades Respiratorias, CIBERES, Madrid, Spain Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares, CNIC, Madrid, Spain Translational and Molecular Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York. 2. Translational and Molecular Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. 3. Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. 4. Department of Oncological Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York The Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York Immunology Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York. 5. Leon H. Charney Division of Cardiology and Marc and Ruti Bell Program in Vascular Biology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York. 6. Translational and Molecular Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York. 7. Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York; and. 8. Translational and Molecular Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York Department of Vascular Medicine, Academic Medical Center of the University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands reinert@mskcc.org willem.mulder@mssm.edu. 9. Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York; and reinert@mskcc.org willem.mulder@mssm.edu.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) are increasingly investigated in cancer immunology and are considered a promising target for better and tailored treatment of malignant growth. Although TAMs also have high diagnostic and prognostic value, TAM imaging still remains largely unexplored. Here, we describe the development of reconstituted high-density lipoprotein (rHDL)-facilitated TAM PET imaging in a breast cancer model. METHODS: Radiolabeled rHDL nanoparticles incorporating the long-lived positron-emitting nuclide (89)Zr were developed using 2 different approaches. The nanoparticles were composed of phospholipids and apolipoprotein A-I (apoA-I) in a 2.5:1 weight ratio. (89)Zr was complexed with deferoxamine (also known as desferrioxamine B, desferoxamine B), conjugated either to a phospholipid or to apoA-I to generate (89)Zr-PL-HDL and (89)Zr-AI-HDL, respectively. In vivo evaluation was performed in an orthotopic mouse model of breast cancer and included pharmacokinetic analysis, biodistribution studies, and PET imaging. Ex vivo histologic analysis of tumor tissues to assess regional distribution of (89)Zr radioactivity was also performed. Fluorescent analogs of the radiolabeled agents were used to determine cell-targeting specificity using flow cytometry. RESULTS: The phospholipid- and apoA-I-labeled rHDL were produced at 79% ± 13% (n = 6) and 94% ± 6% (n = 6) radiochemical yield, respectively, with excellent radiochemical purity (>99%). Intravenous administration of both probes resulted in high tumor radioactivity accumulation (16.5 ± 2.8 and 8.6 ± 1.3 percentage injected dose per gram for apoA-I- and phospholipid-labeled rHDL, respectively) at 24 h after injection. Histologic analysis showed good colocalization of radioactivity with TAM-rich areas in tumor sections. Flow cytometry revealed high specificity of rHDL for TAMs, which had the highest uptake per cell (6.8-fold higher than tumor cells for both DiO@Zr-PL-HDL and DiO@Zr-AI-HDL) and accounted for 40.7% and 39.5% of the total cellular DiO@Zr-PL-HDL and DiO@Zr-AI-HDL in tumors, respectively. CONCLUSION: We have developed (89)Zr-labeled TAM imaging agents based on the natural nanoparticle rHDL. In an orthotopic mouse model of breast cancer, we have demonstrated their specificity for macrophages, a result that was corroborated by flow cytometry. Quantitative macrophage PET imaging with our (89)Zr-rHDL imaging agents could be valuable for noninvasive monitoring of TAM immunology and targeted treatment.
UNLABELLED: Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) are increasingly investigated in cancer immunology and are considered a promising target for better and tailored treatment of malignant growth. Although TAMs also have high diagnostic and prognostic value, TAM imaging still remains largely unexplored. Here, we describe the development of reconstituted high-density lipoprotein (rHDL)-facilitated TAMPET imaging in a breast cancer model. METHODS: Radiolabeled rHDL nanoparticles incorporating the long-lived positron-emitting nuclide (89)Zr were developed using 2 different approaches. The nanoparticles were composed of phospholipids and apolipoprotein A-I (apoA-I) in a 2.5:1 weight ratio. (89)Zr was complexed with deferoxamine (also known as desferrioxamine B, desferoxamine B), conjugated either to a phospholipid or to apoA-I to generate (89)Zr-PL-HDL and (89)Zr-AI-HDL, respectively. In vivo evaluation was performed in an orthotopic mouse model of breast cancer and included pharmacokinetic analysis, biodistribution studies, and PET imaging. Ex vivo histologic analysis of tumor tissues to assess regional distribution of (89)Zr radioactivity was also performed. Fluorescent analogs of the radiolabeled agents were used to determine cell-targeting specificity using flow cytometry. RESULTS: The phospholipid- and apoA-I-labeled rHDL were produced at 79% ± 13% (n = 6) and 94% ± 6% (n = 6) radiochemical yield, respectively, with excellent radiochemical purity (>99%). Intravenous administration of both probes resulted in high tumor radioactivity accumulation (16.5 ± 2.8 and 8.6 ± 1.3 percentage injected dose per gram for apoA-I- and phospholipid-labeled rHDL, respectively) at 24 h after injection. Histologic analysis showed good colocalization of radioactivity with TAM-rich areas in tumor sections. Flow cytometry revealed high specificity of rHDL for TAMs, which had the highest uptake per cell (6.8-fold higher than tumor cells for both DiO@Zr-PL-HDL and DiO@Zr-AI-HDL) and accounted for 40.7% and 39.5% of the total cellular DiO@Zr-PL-HDL and DiO@Zr-AI-HDL in tumors, respectively. CONCLUSION: We have developed (89)Zr-labeled TAM imaging agents based on the natural nanoparticle rHDL. In an orthotopic mouse model of breast cancer, we have demonstrated their specificity for macrophages, a result that was corroborated by flow cytometry. Quantitative macrophage PET imaging with our (89)Zr-rHDL imaging agents could be valuable for noninvasive monitoring of TAM immunology and targeted treatment.
Authors: Maria J W D Vosjan; Lars R Perk; Gerard W M Visser; Marianne Budde; Paul Jurek; Garry E Kiefer; Guus A M S van Dongen Journal: Nat Protoc Date: 2010-03-25 Impact factor: 13.491
Authors: Torjus Skajaa; David P Cormode; Erling Falk; Willem J M Mulder; Edward A Fisher; Zahi A Fayad Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 2009-10-08 Impact factor: 8.311
Authors: Jun Tang; Mark E Lobatto; Laurien Hassing; Susanne van der Staay; Sarian M van Rijs; Claudia Calcagno; Mounia S Braza; Samantha Baxter; Francois Fay; Brenda L Sanchez-Gaytan; Raphaël Duivenvoorden; Hendrik Sager; Yaritzy M Astudillo; Wei Leong; Sarayu Ramachandran; Gert Storm; Carlos Pérez-Medina; Thomas Reiner; David P Cormode; Gustav J Strijkers; Erik S G Stroes; Filip K Swirski; Matthias Nahrendorf; Edward A Fisher; Zahi A Fayad; Willem J M Mulder Journal: Sci Adv Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 14.136
Authors: Raphaël Duivenvoorden; Jun Tang; David P Cormode; Aneta J Mieszawska; David Izquierdo-Garcia; Canturk Ozcan; Maarten J Otten; Neeha Zaidi; Mark E Lobatto; Sarian M van Rijs; Bram Priem; Emma L Kuan; Catherine Martel; Bernd Hewing; Hendrik Sager; Matthias Nahrendorf; Gwendalyn J Randolph; Erik S G Stroes; Valentin Fuster; Edward A Fisher; Zahi A Fayad; Willem J M Mulder Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2014 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Willem J M Mulder; Jordi Ochando; Leo A B Joosten; Zahi A Fayad; Mihai G Netea Journal: Nat Rev Drug Discov Date: 2019-07 Impact factor: 84.694
Authors: Hye-Yeong Kim; Ran Li; Thomas S C Ng; Gabriel Courties; Christopher Blake Rodell; Mark Prytyskach; Rainer H Kohler; Mikael J Pittet; Matthias Nahrendorf; Ralph Weissleder; Miles A Miller Journal: ACS Nano Date: 2018-12-11 Impact factor: 15.881
Authors: Amr Alaarg; Carlos Pérez-Medina; Josbert M Metselaar; Matthias Nahrendorf; Zahi A Fayad; Gert Storm; Willem J M Mulder Journal: Adv Drug Deliv Rev Date: 2017-05-12 Impact factor: 15.470
Authors: Bram Priem; Mandy M T van Leent; Abraham J P Teunissen; Alexandros Marios Sofias; Vera P Mourits; Lisa Willemsen; Emma D Klein; Roderick S Oosterwijk; Anu E Meerwaldt; Jazz Munitz; Geoffrey Prévot; Anna Vera Verschuur; Sheqouia A Nauta; Esther M van Leeuwen; Elizabeth L Fisher; Karen A M de Jong; Yiming Zhao; Yohana C Toner; Georgios Soultanidis; Claudia Calcagno; Paul H H Bomans; Heiner Friedrich; Nico Sommerdijk; Thomas Reiner; Raphaël Duivenvoorden; Eva Zupančič; Julie S Di Martino; Ewelina Kluza; Mohammad Rashidian; Hidde L Ploegh; Rick M Dijkhuizen; Sjoerd Hak; Carlos Pérez-Medina; Jose Javier Bravo-Cordero; Menno P J de Winther; Leo A B Joosten; Andrea van Elsas; Zahi A Fayad; Alexander Rialdi; Denis Torre; Ernesto Guccione; Jordi Ochando; Mihai G Netea; Arjan W Griffioen; Willem J M Mulder Journal: Cell Date: 2020-10-29 Impact factor: 41.582