Francesca Garrard1, Matthew Ridd2, Harini Narayan3, Alan A Montgomery4. 1. School of Acute Care Common Stem, Severn Deanery, Bristol, UK. Electronic address: FGarrard@doctors.org.uk. 2. Centre for Academic Primary Care, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. 3. The Great Western Hospital, Swindon, UK. 4. Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The UK Government has prioritised shared decision making (SDM) and choice in maternity services, but no studies have explored the breadth of antenatal decisions or the feasibility of this aspiration. This study aimed to describe the decisions made, investigate the factors associated with choice and explore SDM practice. METHODS: Cross-sectional audio-recording of consultations in a UK district general hospital. Multi-level regression models were used to investigate associations between choice and doctor, patient, consultation and decision variables. RESULTS: 585 decisions were documented with a mean of 3.0 (SD 1.5) per consultation. No choice was offered in 75% of decisions. Choice was associated with the decision topic, consultation length, Royal College membership status and presence on the specialist register. CONCLUSIONS: Without a choice, it will be challenging for a patient and their healthcare profession to truly share decisions. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: If universal SDM is the aim, then further work is required to understand the factors impacting choice availability and SDM, while engaging and supporting healthcare professionals to offer options and share decisions with patients.
OBJECTIVE: The UK Government has prioritised shared decision making (SDM) and choice in maternity services, but no studies have explored the breadth of antenatal decisions or the feasibility of this aspiration. This study aimed to describe the decisions made, investigate the factors associated with choice and explore SDM practice. METHODS: Cross-sectional audio-recording of consultations in a UK district general hospital. Multi-level regression models were used to investigate associations between choice and doctor, patient, consultation and decision variables. RESULTS: 585 decisions were documented with a mean of 3.0 (SD 1.5) per consultation. No choice was offered in 75% of decisions. Choice was associated with the decision topic, consultation length, Royal College membership status and presence on the specialist register. CONCLUSIONS: Without a choice, it will be challenging for a patient and their healthcare profession to truly share decisions. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: If universal SDM is the aim, then further work is required to understand the factors impacting choice availability and SDM, while engaging and supporting healthcare professionals to offer options and share decisions with patients.
Authors: Jo Hilder; Maria Stubbe; Lindsay Macdonald; Peter Abels; Anthony C Dowell Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2020-08-27 Impact factor: 3.007