Literature DB >> 26111416

Chronic Wounds: Factors Influencing Healing Within 3 Months and Nonhealing After 5-6 Months of Care.

Katherine R Jones, Kristopher Fennie, Amber Lenihan.   

Abstract

Chronic wounds affect approximately 2.5 million to 4.5 million people in the US and are particularly a problem for the elderly. Nonhealing or slow healing wounds represent a major health burden and drain on resources, contributing to substantial disability, morbidity, and costs. This study was conducted to identify factors that influence the healing of chronic wounds within 3 months of starting treatment, compared to factors influencing nonhealing wounds after 5 or 6 months of treatment. A retrospective review of medical records of subjects with chronic pressure, diabetic, or venous ulcers using a structured data collection form and protocol was conducted at 4 sites located in disperse geographic areas. The sample consisted of 400 subjects with at least 3 months of data. Demographic, case mix, wound characteristics, and treatment characteristics were analyzed. Consistent with the literature, wounds that were larger, deeper, infected, draining larger amounts of exudate, and/or covered with slough or eschar were significantly less likely to heal within 3 months and more likely not to heal after 5-6 months of treatment. Medicaid insurance coverage and being non-white were also associated with poorer healing. A lower percentage of antimicrobial dressings was associated with faster healing, while a lower percentage of moisture-management dressings was associated with nonhealing after 5-6 months. The analysis also showed that inappropriate management of wound exudate and necrotic tissue was associated with poorer healing outcomes. While the influence of insurance coverage and race on healing needs further exploration, healing rates could improve in certain centers through better adherence to evidence-based wound management recommendations.

Entities:  

Year:  2007        PMID: 26111416

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wounds        ISSN: 1044-7946            Impact factor:   1.546


  6 in total

1.  A comparison of the in vitro moisture vapour transmission rate and in vivo fluid-handling capacity of six adhesive foam dressings to a newly reformulated adhesive foam dressing.

Authors:  Cindy L Zehrer; David Holm; Staci E Solfest; Shelley-Ann Walters
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 2.  Care of chronic wounds in palliative care and end-of-life patients.

Authors:  Christine A Chrisman
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  Production of cell-cell signalling molecules by bacteria isolated from human chronic wounds.

Authors:  A H Rickard; K R Colacino; K M Manton; R I Morton; E Pulcini; J Pfeil; D Rhoads; R D Wolcott; G James
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2009-09-21       Impact factor: 3.772

4.  Do telemedicine wound care specialist consults meet the needs of the referring physician? A survey of primary care providers.

Authors:  Marek K Dobke; Dhaval Bhavsar; Fernando Herrera
Journal:  Int J Telemed Appl       Date:  2011-08-11

5.  A pilot multi-centre prospective randomised controlled trial of RECELL for the treatment of venous leg ulcers.

Authors:  Paul D Hayes; Keith G Harding; Susan M Johnson; Charles McCollum; Luc Téot; Kevin Mercer; David Russell
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 3.315

6.  Development of a Model to Predict Healing of Chronic Wounds Within 12 Weeks.

Authors:  Sang Kyu Cho; Soeren Mattke; Hanna Gordon; Mary Sheridan; William Ennis
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 4.730

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.