Joao de Andrade1, Marvin Schwarz2, Harold R Collard3, Tedryl Gentry-Bumpass4, Thomas Colby5, David Lynch6, Robert J Kaner7. 1. University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL. 2. University of Colorado at Denver, Aurora, CO. 3. University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA. 4. University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA. 5. Mayo Clinic Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ. 6. National Jewish Health, Denver, CO. 7. Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC. Electronic address: rkaner@med.cornell.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute-sponsored IPF Clinical Research Network (IPFnet) studies enrolled subjects with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) to evaluate drug therapies in treatment trials. An adjudication committee (AC) provided a structured review of cases in which there was uncertainty or disagreement regarding diagnosis or clinical event classification. This article describes the diagnosis and adjudication processes. METHODS: The diagnostic process was based on review of clinical data and high-resolution CT scans with central review of lung biopsies when available. The AC worked closely with the data coordinating center to obtain clinical, radiologic, and histologic data and to communicate with the clinical centers. The AC used a multidisciplinary discussion model with four clinicians, one radiologist, and one pathologist to adjudicate diagnosis and outcome measures. RESULTS: The IPFnet trials screened 1,015 subjects; of these, 23 cases required review by the AC to establish eligibility. The most common diagnosis for exclusion was suspected chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis. The AC reviewed 88 suspected acute exacerbations (AExs), 93 nonelective hospitalizations, and 16 cases of bleeding. Determination of AEx presented practical challenges to adjudicators, as necessary clinical data were often not collected, particularly when subjects were evaluated outside of the primary study site. CONCLUSIONS: The IPFnet diagnostic process was generally efficient, but a multidisciplinary adjudication committee was critical to assure correct phenotype for study enrollment. The AC was key in adjudicating all adverse outcomes in two IPFnet studies terminated early because of safety issues. Future clinical trials in IPF should consider logistical and cost issues as they incorporate AExs and hospitalizations as outcome measures. TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT00517933, NCT00650091, NCT00957242; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute-sponsored IPF Clinical Research Network (IPFnet) studies enrolled subjects with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) to evaluate drug therapies in treatment trials. An adjudication committee (AC) provided a structured review of cases in which there was uncertainty or disagreement regarding diagnosis or clinical event classification. This article describes the diagnosis and adjudication processes. METHODS: The diagnostic process was based on review of clinical data and high-resolution CT scans with central review of lung biopsies when available. The AC worked closely with the data coordinating center to obtain clinical, radiologic, and histologic data and to communicate with the clinical centers. The AC used a multidisciplinary discussion model with four clinicians, one radiologist, and one pathologist to adjudicate diagnosis and outcome measures. RESULTS: The IPFnet trials screened 1,015 subjects; of these, 23 cases required review by the AC to establish eligibility. The most common diagnosis for exclusion was suspected chronic hypersensitivitypneumonitis. The AC reviewed 88 suspected acute exacerbations (AExs), 93 nonelective hospitalizations, and 16 cases of bleeding. Determination of AEx presented practical challenges to adjudicators, as necessary clinical data were often not collected, particularly when subjects were evaluated outside of the primary study site. CONCLUSIONS: The IPFnet diagnostic process was generally efficient, but a multidisciplinary adjudication committee was critical to assure correct phenotype for study enrollment. The AC was key in adjudicating all adverse outcomes in two IPFnet studies terminated early because of safety issues. Future clinical trials in IPF should consider logistical and cost issues as they incorporate AExs and hospitalizations as outcome measures. TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT00517933, NCT00650091, NCT00957242; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.
Authors: Harold R Collard; Bethany B Moore; Kevin R Flaherty; Kevin K Brown; Robert J Kaner; Talmadge E King; Joseph A Lasky; James E Loyd; Imre Noth; Mitchell A Olman; Ganesh Raghu; Jesse Roman; Jay H Ryu; David A Zisman; Gary W Hunninghake; Thomas V Colby; Jim J Egan; David M Hansell; Takeshi Johkoh; Naftali Kaminski; Dong Soon Kim; Yasuhiro Kondoh; David A Lynch; Joachim Müller-Quernheim; Jeffrey L Myers; Andrew G Nicholson; Moisés Selman; Galen B Toews; Athol U Wells; Fernando J Martinez Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2007-06-21 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Ganesh Raghu; Harold R Collard; Jim J Egan; Fernando J Martinez; Juergen Behr; Kevin K Brown; Thomas V Colby; Jean-François Cordier; Kevin R Flaherty; Joseph A Lasky; David A Lynch; Jay H Ryu; Jeffrey J Swigris; Athol U Wells; Julio Ancochea; Demosthenes Bouros; Carlos Carvalho; Ulrich Costabel; Masahito Ebina; David M Hansell; Takeshi Johkoh; Dong Soon Kim; Talmadge E King; Yasuhiro Kondoh; Jeffrey Myers; Nestor L Müller; Andrew G Nicholson; Luca Richeldi; Moisés Selman; Rosalind F Dudden; Barbara S Griss; Shandra L Protzko; Holger J Schünemann Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2011-03-15 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: David A Zisman; Marvin Schwarz; Kevin J Anstrom; Harold R Collard; Kevin R Flaherty; Gary W Hunninghake Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2010-05-18 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Ganesh Raghu; Kevin J Anstrom; Talmadge E King; Joseph A Lasky; Fernando J Martinez Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-05-20 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Kevin R Flaherty; Talmadge E King; Ganesh Raghu; Joseph P Lynch; Thomas V Colby; William D Travis; Barry H Gross; Ella A Kazerooni; Galen B Toews; Qi Long; Susan Murray; Vibha N Lama; Steven E Gay; Fernando J Martinez Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2004-07-15 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Imre Noth; Kevin J Anstrom; Sara Bristol Calvert; Joao de Andrade; Kevin R Flaherty; Craig Glazer; Robert J Kaner; Mitchell A Olman Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2012-05-03 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Talmadge E King; Williamson Z Bradford; Socorro Castro-Bernardini; Elizabeth A Fagan; Ian Glaspole; Marilyn K Glassberg; Eduard Gorina; Peter M Hopkins; David Kardatzke; Lisa Lancaster; David J Lederer; Steven D Nathan; Carlos A Pereira; Steven A Sahn; Robert Sussman; Jeffrey J Swigris; Paul W Noble Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2014-05-18 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Fernando J Martinez; Joao A de Andrade; Kevin J Anstrom; Talmadge E King; Ganesh Raghu Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2014-05-18 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Luca Richeldi; Roland M du Bois; Ganesh Raghu; Arata Azuma; Kevin K Brown; Ulrich Costabel; Vincent Cottin; Kevin R Flaherty; David M Hansell; Yoshikazu Inoue; Dong Soon Kim; Martin Kolb; Andrew G Nicholson; Paul W Noble; Moisés Selman; Hiroyuki Taniguchi; Michèle Brun; Florence Le Maulf; Mannaïg Girard; Susanne Stowasser; Rozsa Schlenker-Herceg; Bernd Disse; Harold R Collard Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2014-05-18 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Chad A Newton; David Zhang; Justin M Oldham; Julia Kozlitina; Shwu-Fan Ma; Fernando J Martinez; Ganesh Raghu; Imre Noth; Christine Kim Garcia Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Christopher J Ryerson; Tamera J Corte; Joyce S Lee; Luca Richeldi; Simon L F Walsh; Jeffrey L Myers; Jürgen Behr; Vincent Cottin; Sonye K Danoff; Kevin R Flaherty; David J Lederer; David A Lynch; Fernando J Martinez; Ganesh Raghu; William D Travis; Zarir Udwadia; Athol U Wells; Harold R Collard Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2017-11-15 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Robin R Deterding; Emily M DeBoer; Michal J Cidon; Terry E Robinson; David Warburton; Gail H Deutsch; Lisa R Young Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2019-11-15 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Kevin J Anstrom; Imre Noth; Kevin R Flaherty; Rex H Edwards; Joan Albright; Amanda Baucom; Maria Brooks; Allan B Clark; Emily S Clausen; Michael T Durheim; Dong-Yun Kim; Jerry Kirchner; Justin M Oldham; Laurie D Snyder; Andrew M Wilson; Stephen R Wisniewski; Eric Yow; Fernando J Martinez Journal: Respir Res Date: 2020-03-12
Authors: Robert Camp; Maxwell L Smith; Brandon T Larsen; Anja C Roden; Carol Farver; Andre L Moreira; Richard Attanoos; Raghavendra Pillappa; Irene Sansano; Alexandre Todorovic Fabro; Robert J Homer Journal: BMC Pulm Med Date: 2021-06-01 Impact factor: 3.317