| Literature DB >> 26109901 |
Michal Dubovický1, Eszter Császár1, Kristína Melicherčíková1, Marcela Kuniaková2, Lucia Račková1.
Abstract
An increasing amount of data suggests that depression is an inflammatory disease. Depressed patients have higher peripheral blood levels of inflammatory markers which have been shown to access the brain and interact with the pathophysiological domain known to be involved in depression. Furthermore, microglia activation may play an important role in the inflammatory pathophysiology of depression. In BV-2 microglia cell line, the present study investigated the potential anti-inflammatory effects of venlafaxine, along with its potential influence on injury of lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-stimulated cells. Although venlafaxine showed only marginal influence on the majority of the pro-inflammatory parameters assessed (in particular NO release, phagocytosis and proliferation), it significantly suppressed superoxide production by the stimulated cells. In addition, venlafaxine exerted also a protective effect on mitochondrial membrane potential and lysosomes of the stimulated microglia. In conclusion, our results suggest that although VEN might have only a marginal effect on major pro-inflammatory parameters of microglia, its inhibitory effect on superoxide generation can contribute to the prevention of harmful effects of oxidative and nitrosative stress involved in the pathogenesis of depression. Moreover, the protective effect of VEN on viability of microglia can prevent a rapid reduction of these cells, thus avoiding limitations of several physiological processes in the brain and possibly also the progression of depression.Entities:
Keywords: cytoprotection; depression; inflammation; microglia; venlafaxine
Year: 2015 PMID: 26109901 PMCID: PMC4436209 DOI: 10.2478/intox-2014-0029
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Interdiscip Toxicol ISSN: 1337-6853
Figure 1Viability of BV-2 microglial cells incubated for 24hrs with or without venlafaxine. Data are means ± SD from 3 independent experiments, **p<0.01 vs control.
Figure 2Effect of VEN on inflammatory markers of stimulated BV-2 microglia. Effect of VEN on A: NO production, B: fluorescent latex bead phagocytosis, and C: proliferation assessed by DAPI staining of BV-2 cells stimulated with LPS (1 µg/ml). BV-2 cells were treated with LPS in the presence or absence of VEN for 24 hours and then NO release into media was evaluated. Phagocytosis was assessed within 16 hours of stimulation in the presence or absence of VEN. CON - control; LPS – lipopolysaccharide; VEN – venlafaxine. **p<0.01; ***p<0.001 vs control; && p<0.01, & p<0.05 vs LPS.
Figure 3Effect of VEN on superoxide production in stimulated BV-2 microglia. Nitroblue tetrazolium salt conversion to formazan was assessed in BV-2 cells treated with LPS in the presence or absence of VEN for 16 hours. CON – control; LPS – lipopolysaccharide; VEN – venlafaxine. **p<0.01; ***p<0.001 vs control; && p<0.01, &&& p<0.001 vs LPS.
Figure 4Effect of VEN on mitochondrial depolarization and lysosomal destabilization in stimulated BV-2 microglia. Effect of VEN on A: changes in mitochondrial membrane potential Δψm assessed as the red-to-green fluorescence ratio of the incorporated cationic dye JC-1; and on B: lysosomal stability assessed as the red-to-green fluorescence ratio of the incorporated cationic dye acridine orange. CON – control; LPS – lipopolysaccharide; VEN – venlafaxine. Scale bar: 20um. *p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001 vs control; &<0.05; &&&p<0.001 vs LPS.