Literature DB >> 26109487

Portal vein embolization and its effect on tumour progression for colorectal cancer liver metastases.

E Simoneau1, M Hassanain2,3, M Shaheen1, M Aljiffry4, N Molla5, P Chaudhury1,2, S Anil3, A Khashper5, D Valenti5, P Metrakos1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term outcomes of patients with colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRCLM) exhibiting disease progression after portal vein embolization (PVE).
METHODS: Patients with CRCLM requiring PVE before hepatectomy between 2003 and 2014 were included. Clinical variables, and liver and tumour volumes determined by three-dimensional CT volumetry were assessed before and after PVE. Overall and disease-free survival data were obtained. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of tumour progression after PVE.
RESULTS: Of 141 patients who underwent PVE, 93 (66.0 per cent) had tumour progression and 17 (12.1 per cent) developed new contralateral lesions. Significantly fewer patients had resectable disease in the group with disease progression than among those with stable disease: 43 (46 per cent) of 93 versus 36 (75 per cent) of 48 respectively (P = 0.001). Median survival was similar in patients with and without tumour growth after PVE: 22.5 versus 26.0 months for patients with unresectable tumours (P = 0.706) and 46.2 versus 52.2 months for those with resectable disease (P = 0.953). However, disease-free survival for patients with tumour progression after PVE was shorter than that for patients with stable disease (6.0 versus 20.2 months; P = 0.045). Response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy was the only significant factor associated with tumour progression in multivariable analysis.
CONCLUSION: Tumour progression after PVE did not affect overall survival, but patients with resected tumours who had tumour growth after embolization experienced earlier recurrence. A borderline response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy seemed to be associated with tumour progression after PVE.
© 2015 BJS Society Ltd Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26109487     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.9872

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  11 in total

1.  Long-Term Outcome After Conventional Two-Stage Hepatectomy Versus Tourniquet-ALPPS in Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

Authors:  Ricardo Robles-Campos; Roberto Brusadin; Asunción López-Conesa; Víctor López-López; Álvaro Navarro-Barrios; José J López-Espín; Julio Arévalo-Pérez; Pascual Parrilla
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  ALPPS for Colorectal Liver Metastases.

Authors:  Hauke Lang
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Two-Stage Hepatectomy and ALPPS for Advanced Bilateral Liver Metastases: a Tailored Approach Balancing Risk and Outcome.

Authors:  Janine Baumgart; Florian Jungmann; Fabian Bartsch; Michael Kloth; Jens Mittler; Stefan Heinrich; Hauke Lang
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 4.  Portal vein embolization in extended liver resection.

Authors:  Nisha Narula; Thomas A Aloia
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 5.  Issues to be considered to address the future liver remnant prior to major hepatectomy.

Authors:  Yoji Kishi; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 2.549

6.  Portal vein embolization for induction of selective hepatic hypertrophy prior to major hepatectomy: rationale, techniques, outcomes and future directions.

Authors:  David Li; David C Madoff
Journal:  Cancer Biol Med       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 4.248

7.  ALPPS (associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy) does not affect proliferation, apoptosis, or angiogenesis as compared to standard liver resection for colorectal liver metastases.

Authors:  Katharina Joechle; Christian Moser; Petra Ruemmele; Katharina M Schmidt; Jens M Werner; Edward K Geissler; Hans J Schlitt; Sven A Lang
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 2.754

8.  Can molecular biomarkers replace a clinical risk score for resectable colorectal liver metastasis?

Authors:  Torhild Veen; Kjetil Søreide
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2017-03-15

Review 9.  Oncological benefits of portal vein embolization for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Toru Beppu; Kensuke Yamamura; Hirohisa Okabe; Katsunori Imai; Hiromitsu Hayashi
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol Surg       Date:  2020-12-13

10.  MRI-guided percutaneous thermoablation in combination with hepatic resection as parenchyma-sparing approach in patients with primary and secondary hepatic malignancies: single center long-term experience.

Authors:  Moritz T Winkelmann; Rami Archid; Georg Gohla; Gerald Hefferman; Jens Kübler; Jakob Weiss; Stephan Clasen; Konstantin Nikolaou; Silvio Nadalin; Rüdiger Hoffmann
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 3.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.