Literature DB >> 26109367

CEA in evaluation of adnexal mass: retrospective cohort analysis and review of the literature.

Lena Sagi-Dain1,2, Ofer Lavie1, Ron Auslander1, Shlomi Sagi3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to estimate the diagnostic accuracy of serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels in conjunction with Ca125 in the triage of adnexal masses.
METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was carried out in 495 patients referred to the Gynecology Department at Carmel Medical Center due to adnexal mass, between 2005 and 2012. All patients underwent surgery with histopathologically confirmed diagnosis and preoperative measurements of serum Ca125 and CEA. For each marker, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and risk ratio were calculated.
RESULTS: Combination of CEA with Ca125, compared with Ca125 levels alone, yielded a nonsignificant effect on sensitivity (87.4% vs. 88.9%, respectively, p = 0.64) and specificity (79.3% vs. 74.3%, p = 0.18) in differentiating malignant from benign adnexal masses. CEA levels were higher in mucinous histological types, but were not helpful in detection of borderline tumors. Significantly higher CEA (21.4 ± 53.6 vs. 3.2 ± 11.9 ng/mL, p = 0.0002) and lower Ca125 values (103.9 ± 84.9 vs. 796 ± 1,331.5 U/mL, p = 0.0338) were demonstrated in the 17 metastatic cases compared with 181 primary ovarian malignancies.
CONCLUSIONS: The combination of the tumor markers CEA and Ca125 did not contribute significantly to the detection of malignant adnexal masses compared with Ca125 alone. As our results suggest that higher CEA levels could be useful in differentiating metastatic tumors from primary ovarian malignancy and in diagnosis of mucinous histology, this issue should be investigated in large, well-designed, prospective cohort trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26109367     DOI: 10.5301/jbm.5000158

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Biol Markers        ISSN: 0393-6155            Impact factor:   2.659


  4 in total

1.  Higher expression of calcineurin predicts poor prognosis in unique subtype of ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Bing Xin; Kai-Qiang Ji; Yi-Si Liu; Xiao-Dong Zhao
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 4.234

2.  Comparison of Ultrasound and Tumor Marker CA125 in Diagnosis of Adnexal Mass Malignancies.

Authors:  Fariba Behnamfar; Fatemeh Esmaeilian; Atoosa Adibi; Safoura Rouholamin
Journal:  Adv Biomed Res       Date:  2022-02-28

Review 3.  ESGO/ISUOG/IOTA/ESGE Consensus Statement on pre-operative diagnosis of ovarian tumors.

Authors:  Dirk Timmerman; François Planchamp; Tom Bourne; Chiara Landolfo; Andreas du Bois; Luis Chiva; David Cibula; Nicole Concin; Daniela Fischerova; Wouter Froyman; Guillermo Gallardo Madueño; Birthe Lemley; Annika Loft; Liliana Mereu; Philippe Morice; Denis Querleu; Antonia Carla Testa; Ignace Vergote; Vincent Vandecaveye; Giovanni Scambia; Christina Fotopoulou
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 3.437

4.  Serum CA19-9, CA-125 and CEA as tumor markers for mucinous ovarian tumors.

Authors:  Arb-Aroon Lertkhachonsuk; Supree Buranawongtrakoon; Navamol Lekskul; Naparat Rermluk; Wei-Wei Wee-Stekly; Chuenkamon Charakorn
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Res       Date:  2020-08-23       Impact factor: 1.730

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.