Literature DB >> 26109157

Two-stage management of the infected total hip arthroplasty.

Nemandra A Sandiford1, Clive P Duncan, Donald S Garbuz, Bassam A Masri.   

Abstract

There is currently no consensus on the optimal management of the infected total hip arthroplasty. Multiple management techniques have been described in contemporary literature.This paper focuses on 2-stage revision for the infected total hip arthroplasty. We discuss the rationale and examine the current evidence for the use of this technique.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  2015        PMID： 26109157     DOI： 10.5301/hipint.5000265

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hip Int        ISSN： 1120-7000            Impact factor:   2.135


  4 in total

Review 1.  Mechanical complications of hip spacers: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Andrea Sambri; Michele Fiore; Claudia Rondinella; Lorenzo Morante; Azzurra Paolucci; Claudio Giannini; Calogero Alfonso; Massimiliano De Paolis
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 2.928

2.  Cemented prosthesis as spacer for two-stage revision of infected hip prostheses: a similar infection remission rate and a lower complication rate.

Authors:  Wenming Zhang; Xinyu Fang; Tengbin Shi; Yuanqing Cai; Zida Huang; Chaofan Zhang; Jianhua Lin; Wenbo Li
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2020-08-02       Impact factor: 5.853

3.  Staged revision still works for chronic and deep infection of total elbow arthroplasty?

Authors:  Jae-Man Kwak; Sang-Pil So; In-Ho Jeon
Journal:  SICOT J       Date:  2022-05-26

4.  Insufficient sensitivity of joint aspiration during the two-stage exchange of the hip with spacers.

Authors:  Sebastian Philipp Boelch; Manuel Weissenberger; Frederik Spohn; Maximilian Rudert; Martin Luedemann
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 2.359
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.