Literature DB >> 26109134

Metagenomic analyses reveal no differences in genes involved in cellulose degradation under different tillage treatments.

Maria de Vries1, Anne Schöler2, Julia Ertl1, Zhuofei Xu3, Michael Schloter1.   

Abstract

Incorporation of plant litter is a frequent agricultural practice to increase nutrient availability in soil, and relies heavily on the activity of cellulose-degrading microorganisms. Here we address the question of how different tillage treatments affect soil microbial communities and their cellulose-degrading potential in a long-term agricultural experiment. To identify potential differences in microbial taxonomy and functionality, we generated six soil metagenomes of conventional (CT) and reduced (RT) tillage-treated topsoil samples, which differed in their potential extracellular cellulolytic activity as well as their microbial biomass. Taxonomic analysis of metagenomic data revealed few differences between RT and CT, and a dominance of Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria, whereas eukaryotic phyla were not prevalent. Prediction of cellulolytic enzymes revealed glycoside hydrolase families 1, 3 and 94, auxiliary activity family 8 and carbohydrate-binding module 2 as the most abundant in soil. These were annotated mainly to the phyla of Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria and Bacteroidetes. These results suggest that the observed higher cellulolytic activity in RT soils can be explained by a higher microbial biomass or changed expression levels but not by shifts in the soil microbiome. Overall, this study reveals the stability of soil microbial communities and cellulolytic gene composition under the investigated tillage treatments. © FEMS 2015. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Agriculture; Cellulases; Cellulose degradation; Metagenomics; Microbial Communities; Reduced Tillage

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26109134     DOI: 10.1093/femsec/fiv069

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol        ISSN: 0168-6496            Impact factor:   4.194


  9 in total

1.  Microbial community responses to soil tillage and crop rotation in a corn/soybean agroecosystem.

Authors:  Chris R Smith; Peter L Blair; Charlie Boyd; Brianne Cody; Alexander Hazel; Ashley Hedrick; Hitesh Kathuria; Parul Khurana; Brent Kramer; Kristin Muterspaw; Charles Peck; Emily Sells; Jessica Skinner; Cara Tegeler; Zoe Wolfe
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 2.912

2.  GraftM: a tool for scalable, phylogenetically informed classification of genes within metagenomes.

Authors:  Joel A Boyd; Ben J Woodcroft; Gene W Tyson
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Site-Specific Conditions Change the Response of Bacterial Producers of Soil Structure-Stabilizing Agents Such as Exopolysaccharides and Lipopolysaccharides to Tillage Intensity.

Authors:  Barbara Cania; Gisle Vestergaard; Marjetka Suhadolc; Rok Mihelič; Maike Krauss; Andreas Fliessbach; Paul Mäder; Anna Szumełda; Michael Schloter; Stefanie Schulz
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2020-04-07       Impact factor: 5.640

4.  Shifts in reclamation management strategies shape the role of exopolysaccharide and lipopolysaccharide-producing bacteria during soil formation.

Authors:  Miljenka Vuko; Barbara Cania; Cordula Vogel; Susanne Kublik; Michael Schloter; Stefanie Schulz
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 5.813

5.  Microbial Shifts Following Five Years of Cover Cropping and Tillage Practices in Fertile Agroecosystems.

Authors:  Nakian Kim; María C Zabaloy; Chance W Riggins; Sandra Rodríguez-Zas; María B Villamil
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2020-11-11

6.  A long-term field experiment demonstrates the influence of tillage on the bacterial potential to produce soil structure-stabilizing agents such as exopolysaccharides and lipopolysaccharides.

Authors:  Barbara Cania; Gisle Vestergaard; Maike Krauss; Andreas Fliessbach; Michael Schloter; Stefanie Schulz
Journal:  Environ Microbiome       Date:  2019-03-28

7.  More than 2500 years of oil exposure shape sediment microbiomes with the potential for syntrophic degradation of hydrocarbons linked to methanogenesis.

Authors:  Antonios Michas; Gisle Vestergaard; Kathleen Trautwein; Pavlos Avramidis; Dimitris G Hatzinikolaou; Constantinos E Vorgias; Heinz Wilkes; Ralf Rabus; Michael Schloter; Anne Schöler
Journal:  Microbiome       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 14.650

8.  The difference between cellulolytic 'culturomes' and microbiomes inhabiting two contrasting soil types.

Authors:  Elizaveta V Evdokimova; Grigory V Gladkov; Natalya I Kuzina; Ekaterina A Ivanova; Anastasiia K Kimeklis; Aleksei O Zverev; Arina A Kichko; Tatyana S Aksenova; Alexander G Pinaev; Evgeny E Andronov
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Targeted Metagenomics of Retting in Flax: The Beginning of the Quest to Harness the Secret Powers of the Microbiota.

Authors:  Christophe Djemiel; Estelle Goulas; Nelly Badalato; Brigitte Chabbert; Simon Hawkins; Sébastien Grec
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 4.599

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.