Literature DB >> 26109021

Early results of dexamethasone implant, ranibizumab, and triamcinolone in macular edema due to branch retinal vein occlusion.

Erhan Yumusak1, Nesrin Buyuktortop1, Kemal Ornek1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the short-term results of the efficacy and safety of dexamethasone intravitreal implant (DEX), ranibizumab (RAN), and intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA) in macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO).
METHODS: One eye each of 32 patients who were treated with intravitreal injections for macular edema secondary to BRVO was studied. This retrospective study included 3 groups. The patients received DEX in group 1 (n = 11), RAN in group 2 (n = 11), and IVTA in group 3 (n = 10). Data were collected before and after the injections at the first and third months. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), and intraocular pressure (IOP) were analyzed statistically.
RESULTS: The median duration of the follow-up was 3.0 months in overall groups. The BCVA increased significantly in all groups (p = 0.018, p = 0.034, p = 0.014, respectively). The CMT increased significantly in groups 1 and 3 (p = 0.02, p<0.001, respectively), but not in group 2 (p = 0.14). The IOP increased significantly in groups 1 and 3 (p = 0.05, p<0.001, respectively). Antiglaucomatous treatment was required only in group 3. Cataract developed in 2 patients (20%) in group 3 and surgery was required.
CONCLUSIONS: Although RAN was the safest among the 3 agents, DEX and IVTA reduced CMT more than RAN, while significant improvement was achieved in BCVA in all groups. All 3 agents can be effectively used in the treatment of macular edema due to BRVO.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26109021     DOI: 10.5301/ejo.5000637

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1120-6721            Impact factor:   2.597


  7 in total

1.  Real-life clinical data for dexamethasone and ranibizumab in the treatment of branch or central retinal vein occlusion over a period of six months.

Authors:  Sibylle Winterhalter; Annabelle Eckert; Gerrit-Alexander Vom Brocke; Alice Schneider; Dominika Pohlmann; Daniel Pilger; Antonia M Joussen; Matus Rehak; Ulrike Grittner
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  A comparison of three different intravitreal treatment modalities of macular edema due to branch retinal vein occlusion.

Authors:  Havva Erdogan Kaldırım; Serpil Yazgan
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 2.031

Review 3.  Retinal vein occlusion and the use of a dexamethasone intravitreal implant (Ozurdex®) in its treatment.

Authors:  Justus G Garweg; Souska Zandi
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Intravitreal bevacizumab injections versus dexamethasone implant for treatment-naïve retinal vein occlusion related macular edema.

Authors:  Ilkka Laine; Juha-Matti Lindholm; Petteri Ylinen; Raimo Tuuminen
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-11-27

Review 5.  New Developments in the Classification, Pathogenesis, Risk Factors, Natural History, and Treatment of Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion.

Authors:  Jia Li; Yannis M Paulus; Yuanlu Shuai; Wangyi Fang; Qinghuai Liu; Songtao Yuan
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-03-12       Impact factor: 1.909

6.  Intravitreal corticosteroid implant vs intravitreal ranibizumab for the treatment of macular edema: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Qingquan Wei; Rui Chen; Qiyang Lou; Jing Yu
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2019-01-11       Impact factor: 4.162

7.  Long-term Results of Ranibizumab, Dexamethasone Implant, and Triamcinolone in Macular Edema due to Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion.

Authors:  Nevin Hande Dikel; Erhan Yumusak; Nesrin Buyuktortop Gokcinar
Journal:  Beyoglu Eye J       Date:  2019-12-27
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.