Doris Dolezil1, Annekathrin Haase2, Kristine Jahnke1, Jens Thonack1, Christin Löffler3, Carsten Oliver Schmidt4, Jean-François Chenot1. 1. Abteilung Allgemeinmedizin, Institut für Community Medicine, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald KdöR, Fleischmannstr. 42-44, 17475, Greifswald, Deutschland. 2. Abteilung Allgemeinmedizin, Institut für Community Medicine, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald KdöR, Fleischmannstr. 42-44, 17475, Greifswald, Deutschland. allgemeinmedizin@uni-greifswald.de. 3. Institut für Allgemeinmedizin, Universitätsmedizin Rostock, Rostock, Deutschland. 4. Abteilung Study of Health in Pomerania - Klinisch-epidemiologische Forschung (Shinterviewpartner-KEF), Institut für Community Medicine, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Greifswald, Deutschland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The benefits of cancer screening in the elderly are uncertain. While the risk of cancer increases with age the participation in cancer screening decreases. AIM: The study investigated the attitudes of older adults towards cancer screening as well as their motives for or against participation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This population-based explorative mixed methods study was based on a survey of residents aged 69-89 years from the district of Western Pomerania-Greifswald (northeast Germany). Criteria for exclusion were cognitive deficits and/or cancer. Attitudes towards different statements regarding cancer screening were assessed by a questionnaire using 5-point Likert scales. Semi-structured interviews were used to explore the motivations. RESULTS: Out of 630 contacted residents, 120 (19%) with an average age of 77 years (SD ± 6 years) participated in the face-to-face survey. The majority were in favor of lifelong cancer screening, 14% stated other health problems to be more important than cancer screening and 7% assumed that they would not live long enough to benefit from screening. Motives for participation in cancer screening were habit, regularity, sense of obligation, fear and belief in benefits. Motives for discontinuing screening included a lack of interest, no assumed necessity and fear. Disadvantages were not feared. CONCLUSION: Elderly people show great trust in cancer screening. They overestimated the benefits of cancer screening and their risk to die of cancer. The elderly should be better informed about the benefits and risks of cancer screening. Shared decision-making should be based on life expectancy and personal preferences.
BACKGROUND: The benefits of cancer screening in the elderly are uncertain. While the risk of cancer increases with age the participation in cancer screening decreases. AIM: The study investigated the attitudes of older adults towards cancer screening as well as their motives for or against participation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This population-based explorative mixed methods study was based on a survey of residents aged 69-89 years from the district of Western Pomerania-Greifswald (northeast Germany). Criteria for exclusion were cognitive deficits and/or cancer. Attitudes towards different statements regarding cancer screening were assessed by a questionnaire using 5-point Likert scales. Semi-structured interviews were used to explore the motivations. RESULTS: Out of 630 contacted residents, 120 (19%) with an average age of 77 years (SD ± 6 years) participated in the face-to-face survey. The majority were in favor of lifelong cancer screening, 14% stated other health problems to be more important than cancer screening and 7% assumed that they would not live long enough to benefit from screening. Motives for participation in cancer screening were habit, regularity, sense of obligation, fear and belief in benefits. Motives for discontinuing screening included a lack of interest, no assumed necessity and fear. Disadvantages were not feared. CONCLUSION: Elderly people show great trust in cancer screening. They overestimated the benefits of cancer screening and their risk to die of cancer. The elderly should be better informed about the benefits and risks of cancer screening. Shared decision-making should be based on life expectancy and personal preferences.
Authors: Christopher M Callahan; Frederick W Unverzagt; Siu L Hui; Anthony J Perkins; Hugh C Hendrie Journal: Med Care Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Carmen L Lewis; Christine E Kistler; Halle R Amick; Lea C Watson; Debra L Bynum; Louise C Walter; Michael P Pignone Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2006-08-03 Impact factor: 3.921