Literature DB >> 26108897

Challenges to clinical utilization of hereditary cancer gene panel testing: perspectives from the front lines.

Rebecca K Marcus1, Jennifer L Geurts1,2, Jessica A Grzybowski1,2, Kiran K Turaga1, T Clark Gamblin1, Kimberly A Strong3, Fabian M Johnston4.   

Abstract

Next generation sequencing (NGS) technology is rapidly being implemented into clinical practice. Qualitative research was performed to gain an improved understanding of the landscape surrounding the use of NGS in cancer genetics. A focus group was conducted at the Wisconsin Cancer Risk Programs Network biannual meeting. Free flowing discussion with occasional open-ended questions provided insights into the use of NGS. 19 genetic counselors and medical professionals participated. Three major themes were identified with respect to NGS and its use in cancer genetics: knowledge gaps, the evolving clinician role, and uncertain utility. Several corresponding subthemes were identified. With respect to knowledge gaps, participants expressed concern regarding unexpected results and variants of unknown significance, lack of data about NGS findings, absence of standardization regarding use of NGS and guidelines for interpretation, and discomfort with new technology. Regarding the evolving clinician role, necessary changes to the roles of genetic counselors and physicians were noted, as was the resultant impact on care received by patients and their families. Finally, the clinical and economic utility of NGS was questioned. While a shift from traditional Sanger sequencing to NGS is occurring in molecular genetic testing for disease susceptibility, there are several obstacles that need to be overcome before widespread adoption of this technology can occur. Furthermore, key aspects of NGS and it utility remain unexplored. Continued investigation into these subjects is necessary before this technology will consistently be of benefit to patients and their families.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atttitudes; Geneticist; NGS guidelines; Next generation sequencing; Qualitative research

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26108897     DOI: 10.1007/s10689-015-9817-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Cancer        ISSN: 1389-9600            Impact factor:   2.375


  24 in total

Review 1.  Qualitative research methods in palliative medicine and palliative oncology--an introduction.

Authors:  P Strang
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.089

2.  Inheritance of human breast cancer: evidence for autosomal dominant transmission in high-risk families.

Authors:  B Newman; M A Austin; M Lee; M C King
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Qualitative data analysis for health services research: developing taxonomy, themes, and theory.

Authors:  Elizabeth H Bradley; Leslie A Curry; Kelly J Devers
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Genetic counseling for breast cancer risk: how did we get here and where are we going?

Authors:  Katherine Af Lang
Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Diagn       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 5.225

5.  The evolution of cancer risk assessment in the era of next generation sequencing.

Authors:  Heather Fecteau; Kristen J Vogel; Kristen Hanson; Shannon Morrill-Cornelius
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Genetic heterogeneity and penetrance analysis of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in breast cancer families. The Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium.

Authors:  D Ford; D F Easton; M Stratton; S Narod; D Goldgar; P Devilee; D T Bishop; B Weber; G Lenoir; J Chang-Claude; H Sobol; M D Teare; J Struewing; A Arason; S Scherneck; J Peto; T R Rebbeck; P Tonin; S Neuhausen; R Barkardottir; J Eyfjord; H Lynch; B A Ponder; S A Gayther; M Zelada-Hedman
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  Next-generation sequencing for the diagnosis of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer using genomic capture targeting multiple candidate genes.

Authors:  Laurent Castéra; Sophie Krieger; Antoine Rousselin; Angélina Legros; Jean-Jacques Baumann; Olivia Bruet; Baptiste Brault; Robin Fouillet; Nicolas Goardon; Olivier Letac; Stéphanie Baert-Desurmont; Julie Tinat; Odile Bera; Catherine Dugast; Pascaline Berthet; Florence Polycarpe; Valérie Layet; Agnes Hardouin; Thierry Frébourg; Dominique Vaur
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 4.246

8.  The integration of next-generation sequencing panels in the clinical cancer genetics practice: an institutional experience.

Authors:  Caitlin B Mauer; Sara M Pirzadeh-Miller; Linda D Robinson; David M Euhus
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  Utilization of multigene panels in hereditary cancer predisposition testing: analysis of more than 2,000 patients.

Authors:  Holly LaDuca; A J Stuenkel; Jill S Dolinsky; Steven Keiles; Stephany Tandy; Tina Pesaran; Elaine Chen; Chia-Ling Gau; Erika Palmaer; Kamelia Shoaepour; Divya Shah; Virginia Speare; Stephanie Gandomi; Elizabeth Chao
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Panel-based testing for inherited colorectal cancer: a descriptive study of clinical testing performed by a US laboratory.

Authors:  D Cragun; C Radford; J S Dolinsky; M Caldwell; E Chao; T Pal
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 4.438

View more
  2 in total

1.  Integrating pharmacogenetic testing into primary care.

Authors:  Susanne B Haga
Journal:  Expert Rev Precis Med Drug Dev       Date:  2017-11-03

Review 2.  Evolution of genetic assessment for BRCA-associated gynaecologic malignancies: a Canadian multisociety roadmap.

Authors:  Jeanna M McCuaig; Tracy L Stockley; Patricia Shaw; Michael Fung-Kee-Fung; Alon D Altman; James Bentley; Marcus Q Bernardini; Beatrice Cormier; Hal Hirte; Katharina Kieser; Andree MacMillan; Wendy S Meschino; Karen Panabaker; Renee Perrier; Diane Provencher; Kasmintan A Schrader; Kimberly Serfas; Eva Tomiak; Nora Wong; Sean S Young; Walter Henri Gotlieb; Paul Hoskins; Raymond H Kim
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 6.318

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.