Leon Lor1, Kylie Hill1,2, Peter Jacoby3, Helen Leonard3, Jenny Downs1,3. 1. School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia. 2. Lung Institute of Western Australia and Centre for Asthma, Allergy and Respiratory Research, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia. 3. Telethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.
Abstract
AIM: The aim of this study was to investigate the validity of using a Bouchard activity record (BAR) in individuals with Rett syndrome to measure physical activity, as compared with pragmatic criterion standard measures of walking status and step counts recorded using the StepWatch activity monitor (SAM). METHOD: During the waking hours of 1 day, 43 females (mean age 21y, SD 9y) wore a SAM whilst a proxy completed a modified BAR. Responses to the BAR were compared among participants, who were grouped according to walking status, using the Mann-Whitney two-sample rank-sum test. Relationships were sought between BAR responses and step counts using linear regression. RESULTS: According to the proxy-reported BAR responses, those who needed assistance with walking spent more time sitting (median [interquartile range] 9h 15min [8h 8min-10h 30min] vs 6h 15min [4h 15min-8h 30min]; p<0.001) and less time standing (1h [38min-1h 30min] vs 2h 15min [45min-3h 45min]; p=0.04) than those who could walk independently. In those who could walk independently, time classified as 'uptime' (standing and walking) using the BAR was associated with increased step count (r(2) =0.58; p<0.001). INTERPRETATION: These data support the validity of proxy-reported BAR responses. In those who could walk independently, uptime, classified using the BAR, could be used to estimate daily step count. This tool offers an inexpensive method for clinicians to gain insights into physical activity levels in individuals with Rett syndrome.
AIM: The aim of this study was to investigate the validity of using a Bouchard activity record (BAR) in individuals with Rett syndrome to measure physical activity, as compared with pragmatic criterion standard measures of walking status and step counts recorded using the StepWatch activity monitor (SAM). METHOD: During the waking hours of 1 day, 43 females (mean age 21y, SD 9y) wore a SAM whilst a proxy completed a modified BAR. Responses to the BAR were compared among participants, who were grouped according to walking status, using the Mann-Whitney two-sample rank-sum test. Relationships were sought between BAR responses and step counts using linear regression. RESULTS: According to the proxy-reported BAR responses, those who needed assistance with walking spent more time sitting (median [interquartile range] 9h 15min [8h 8min-10h 30min] vs 6h 15min [4h 15min-8h 30min]; p<0.001) and less time standing (1h [38min-1h 30min] vs 2h 15min [45min-3h 45min]; p=0.04) than those who could walk independently. In those who could walk independently, time classified as 'uptime' (standing and walking) using the BAR was associated with increased step count (r(2) =0.58; p<0.001). INTERPRETATION: These data support the validity of proxy-reported BAR responses. In those who could walk independently, uptime, classified using the BAR, could be used to estimate daily step count. This tool offers an inexpensive method for clinicians to gain insights into physical activity levels in individuals with Rett syndrome.
Authors: Alberto Romano; Elena Ippolito; Camilla Risoli; Edoardo Malerba; Martina Favetta; Andrea Sancesario; Meir Lotan; Daniel Sender Moran Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-01-22 Impact factor: 4.241