Chang-Hyun Lee1, Chun Kee Chung2,3,4, Seung-Jae Hyun5, Chi Heon Kim6,7,8, Ki-Jeong Kim5, Tae-Ahn Jahng6,5. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, Konyang University Hospital, Konyang University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Republic of Korea. 2. Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-Ro, Jongno-Gu, Seoul, 110-744, Republic of Korea. chungc@snu.ac.kr. 3. Neuroscience Research Institute, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea. chungc@snu.ac.kr. 4. Clinical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. chungc@snu.ac.kr. 5. Department of Neurosurgery, Spine Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea. 6. Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-Ro, Jongno-Gu, Seoul, 110-744, Republic of Korea. 7. Neuroscience Research Institute, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 8. Clinical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Spinal intradural extramedullary (IDEM) schwannoma diagnosed by magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is sometimes detected incidentally. Because the natural history of spinal IDEM schwannoma has not been established well, questions remain regarding whether small and asymptomatic tumour has to be removed. We aimed to assess the natural history of spinal schwannoma diagnosed by MR imaging using an accurate and reliable method. METHODS: All patients who were diagnosed with spinal IDEM schwannoma by MR imaging and did not undergo surgical resection immediately were recruited. A number of 56 tumours were enrolled finally. Tumour volume was measured using the volume quantification method from the baseline through the final follow-up. Receiver operating characteristics plots were used to define cut-off value of discrimination. RESULTS: The probable schwannoma grew 5.45% [median value of volumetric growth rate (VGR); interquartile range 0.14-14.19] annually with a mean surveillance interval of 43.6 months. Of the 56 tumours, some tumours kept growing rapidly and the others did not. The median annual VGR of the growing and stable probable schwannomas was 13.02 and -0.09%, respectively (P<0.001). They can be roughly divided by 2.5% of the annual VGR and usually maintained each growth pattern and the cross-over rate to growth pattern was 15.6%. CONCLUSIONS: Spinal probable IDEM schwannoma grew 5.45% of the tumour volume annually and can be divided into growing and stable tumours. The tumour that grows≥2.5% of volume per year needs a careful inspection because it may be not benign schwannoma and keep growing continuously.
PURPOSE: Spinal intradural extramedullary (IDEM) schwannoma diagnosed by magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is sometimes detected incidentally. Because the natural history of spinal IDEM schwannoma has not been established well, questions remain regarding whether small and asymptomatic tumour has to be removed. We aimed to assess the natural history of spinal schwannoma diagnosed by MR imaging using an accurate and reliable method. METHODS: All patients who were diagnosed with spinal IDEM schwannoma by MR imaging and did not undergo surgical resection immediately were recruited. A number of 56 tumours were enrolled finally. Tumour volume was measured using the volume quantification method from the baseline through the final follow-up. Receiver operating characteristics plots were used to define cut-off value of discrimination. RESULTS: The probable schwannoma grew 5.45% [median value of volumetric growth rate (VGR); interquartile range 0.14-14.19] annually with a mean surveillance interval of 43.6 months. Of the 56 tumours, some tumours kept growing rapidly and the others did not. The median annual VGR of the growing and stable probable schwannomas was 13.02 and -0.09%, respectively (P<0.001). They can be roughly divided by 2.5% of the annual VGR and usually maintained each growth pattern and the cross-over rate to growth pattern was 15.6%. CONCLUSIONS: Spinal probable IDEM schwannoma grew 5.45% of the tumour volume annually and can be divided into growing and stable tumours. The tumour that grows≥2.5% of volume per year needs a careful inspection because it may be not benign schwannoma and keep growing continuously.
Authors: O De Verdelhan; C Haegelen; B Carsin-Nicol; L Riffaud; S F A Amlashi; G Brassier; M Carsin; X Morandi Journal: J Neuroradiol Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 3.447
Authors: Perry J Pickhardt; David H Kim; B Dustin Pooler; J Louis Hinshaw; Duncan Barlow; Don Jensen; Mark Reichelderfer; Brooks D Cash Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2013-06-07 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Shan Tang; Andrew S Griffin; Julian A Waksal; C Douglas Phillips; Carl E Johnson; Joseph P Comunale; Sasan Karimi; Tiffany L Powell; Philip E Stieg; Philip H Gutin; Kevin D Brown; Matthew Sheehan; Samuel H Selesnick Journal: Otol Neurotol Date: 2014-08 Impact factor: 2.311
Authors: Steffen Rosahl; Christopher Bohr; Michael Lell; Klaus Hamm; Heinrich Iro Journal: GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2017-12-18