Literature DB >> 26107539

Evidence for Intensive Aphasia Therapy: Consideration of Theories From Neuroscience and Cognitive Psychology.

Jade K Dignam1, Amy D Rodriguez2, David A Copland3.   

Abstract

Treatment intensity is a critical component to the delivery of speech-language pathology and rehabilitation services. Within aphasia rehabilitation, however, insufficient evidence currently exists to guide clinical decision making with respect to the optimal treatment intensity. This review considers perspectives from 2 key bodies of research, the neuroscience and cognitive psychology literature, with respect to the scheduling of aphasia rehabilitation services. Neuroscience research suggests that intensive training is a key element of rehabilitation and is necessary to achieve functional and neurologic changes after a stroke occurs. In contrast, the cognitive psychology literature suggests that optimal long-term learning is achieved when training is provided in a distributed or nonintensive schedule. These perspectives are evaluated and discussed with respect to the current evidence for treatment intensity in aphasia rehabilitation. In addition, directions for future research are identified, including study design, methods of defining and measuring treatment intensity, and selection of outcome measures in aphasia rehabilitation.
Copyright © 2016 American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26107539     DOI: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2015.06.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PM R        ISSN: 1934-1482            Impact factor:   2.298


  13 in total

1.  Re-learning and remembering in the lesioned brain.

Authors:  Brenda Rapp; Robert W Wiley
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  Retrieval practice and spacing effects in multi-session treatment of naming impairment in aphasia.

Authors:  Erica L Middleton; Katherine A Rawson; Jay Verkuilen
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 4.027

3.  A Review of the Application of Distributed Practice Principles to Naming Treatment in Aphasia.

Authors:  Erica L Middleton; Julia Schuchard; Katherine A Rawson
Journal:  Top Lang Disord       Date:  2020

4.  Aerobic Exercise as an Adjuvant to Aphasia Therapy: Theory, Preliminary Findings, and Future Directions.

Authors:  Stacy M Harnish; Amy D Rodriguez; Deena Schwen Blackett; Christopher Gregory; Lauren Seeds; Jeffrey H Boatright; Bruce Crosson
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2017-12-23       Impact factor: 3.393

Review 5.  The neural and neurocomputational bases of recovery from post-stroke aphasia.

Authors:  James D Stefaniak; Ajay D Halai; Matthew A Lambon Ralph
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 44.711

6.  Speech and language therapy for aphasia following subacute stroke.

Authors:  Engin Koyuncu; Pınar Çam; Nermin Altınok; Duygu Ekinci Çallı; Tuba Yarbay Duman; Neşe Özgirgin
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 5.135

7.  Controlling cardiovascular diseases in low and middle income countries by placing proof in pragmatism.

Authors:  Mayowa Owolabi; Jaime J Miranda; Joseph Yaria; Bruce Ovbiagele
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2016-10-05

Review 8.  Constraint-induced aphasia therapy in post-stroke aphasia rehabilitation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Jiaqi Zhang; Jiadan Yu; Yong Bao; Qing Xie; Yang Xu; Junmei Zhang; Pu Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Aphasia Recovery: When, How and Who to Treat?

Authors:  Catherine Doogan; Jade Dignam; David Copland; Alex Leff
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 5.081

10.  Comparison of Therapy Practice at Home and in the Clinic: A Retrospective Analysis of the Constant Therapy Platform Data Set.

Authors:  Jason Godlove; Veera Anantha; Mahendra Advani; Carrie Des Roches; Swathi Kiran
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 4.003

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.