Literature DB >> 26107458

Bibliometric indexes, databases and impact factors in cardiology.

Igor R C Bienert1, Rogério Carvalho de Oliveira2, Pedro Beraldo de Andrade1, Carlos Antonio Caramori2.   

Abstract

Bibliometry is a quantitative statistical technique to measure levels of production and dissemination of knowledge, as well as a useful tool to track the development of an scientific area. The valuation of production required for recognition of researchers and magazines is accomplished through tools called bibliometric indexes, divided into quality indicators and scientific impact. Initially developed for monographs of statistical measures especially in libraries, today bibliometrics is mainly used to evaluate productivity of authors and citation repercussion. However, these tools have limitations and sometimes provoke controversies about indiscriminate application, leading to the development of newer indexes. It is important to know the most common search indexes and use it properly even acknowledging its limitations as it has a direct impact in their daily practice, reputation and funds achievement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26107458      PMCID: PMC4462972          DOI: 10.5935/1678-9741.20150019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc


  14 in total

1.  Impact factor.

Authors:  P Sloan; I Needleman
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2000-07-08       Impact factor: 1.626

Review 2.  [Bibliometry of biological systematics in Latin America during the twentieth century in three global databases].

Authors:  Layla Michán; Jorge Llorente-Bousquets
Journal:  Rev Biol Trop       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 0.723

3.  An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output.

Authors:  J E Hirsch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-11-07       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The top-ten in journal impact factor manipulation.

Authors:  Matthew E Falagas; Vangelis G Alexiou
Journal:  Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz)       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 4.291

5.  Comparison of SCImago journal rank indicator with journal impact factor.

Authors:  Matthew E Falagas; Vasilios D Kouranos; Ricardo Arencibia-Jorge; Drosos E Karageorgopoulos
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2008-04-11       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Brazilian citation scheme outed.

Authors:  Richard Van Noorden
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  [Open letter to the president of CAPES: the new Qualis, which has nothing to do with the science of Brazil. ].

Authors:  Mauricio Rocha-e-Silva
Journal:  Pro Fono       Date:  2009 Oct-Dec

8.  Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research.

Authors:  P O Seglen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-02-15

9.  The evaluation of research papers in the XXI century. The Open Peer Discussion system of the World Economics Association.

Authors:  Grazia Ietto-Gillies
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2012-08-07       Impact factor: 2.380

10.  Comparison Between Impact Factor, Eigenfactor Metrics, and SCimago Journal Rank Indicator of Pediatric Neurology Journals.

Authors:  Hamidreza Kianifar; Ramin Sadeghi; Leili Zarifmahmoudi
Journal:  Acta Inform Med       Date:  2014-04
View more
  3 in total

1.  Program Directors Research Productivity and Other Factors of Anesthesiology Residency Programs That Relate to Program Doximity Ranking.

Authors:  Shooka Esmaeeli; Michelle Seu; Jennifer Akin; Parvin Nejatmahmoodalilioo; Nebojsa Nick Knezevic
Journal:  J Educ Perioper Med       Date:  2021-04-01

2.  Scientific Publications in Dentistry in Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia Between 1996 and 2018: A Bibliometric Analysis.

Authors:  Lukas Poskevicius; María De la Flor-Martínez; Pablo Galindo-Moreno; Gintaras Juodzbalys
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2019-06-14

Review 3.  Bibliometrics: tracking research impact by selecting the appropriate metrics.

Authors:  Ashok Agarwal; Damayanthi Durairajanayagam; Sindhuja Tatagari; Sandro C Esteves; Avi Harlev; Ralf Henkel; Shubhadeep Roychoudhury; Sheryl Homa; Nicolás Garrido Puchalt; Ranjith Ramasamy; Ahmad Majzoub; Kim Dao Ly; Eva Tvrda; Mourad Assidi; Kavindra Kesari; Reecha Sharma; Saleem Banihani; Edmund Ko; Muhammad Abu-Elmagd; Jaime Gosalvez; Asher Bashiri
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.285

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.