Marieke Sleijpen1,2, Hennie R Boeije3, Rolf J Kleber1,2, Trudy Mooren1,4. 1. a Foundation Arq , Diemen , the Netherlands. 2. b Department of Clinical & Health Psychology , Utrecht University , Utrecht , the Netherlands. 3. c Department of Methodology and Statistics , Utrecht University , Utrecht , the Netherlands. 4. d Foundation Centrum'45 , Oegstgeest , the Netherlands.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This article reviews available qualitative studies that report young refugees' ways of dealing with adversity to address their sources of resilience. DESIGN: We searched five electronic databases. Twenty-six empirical studies were included in the review. A meta-ethnography approach was used to synthesize these qualitative studies. RESULTS: Six sources of resilience emerged: (1) social support, (2) acculturation strategies, (3) education, (4) religion, (5) avoidance, and (6) hope. These sources indicated social as well as personal factors that confer resilience in young refugees, but most of them also had counterproductive aspects. CONCLUSION: The results, from an ecological developmental perspective, stressed the interplay between protective and risk processes in the mental health of young refugees who had resettled in Western countries, and they emphasized the variability as well as the universality of resilience-promoting processes. Further research is needed to explore the cultural shape of resilience and the long-term consequences of war and migration on young refugees.
OBJECTIVE: This article reviews available qualitative studies that report young refugees' ways of dealing with adversity to address their sources of resilience. DESIGN: We searched five electronic databases. Twenty-six empirical studies were included in the review. A meta-ethnography approach was used to synthesize these qualitative studies. RESULTS: Six sources of resilience emerged: (1) social support, (2) acculturation strategies, (3) education, (4) religion, (5) avoidance, and (6) hope. These sources indicated social as well as personal factors that confer resilience in young refugees, but most of them also had counterproductive aspects. CONCLUSION: The results, from an ecological developmental perspective, stressed the interplay between protective and risk processes in the mental health of young refugees who had resettled in Western countries, and they emphasized the variability as well as the universality of resilience-promoting processes. Further research is needed to explore the cultural shape of resilience and the long-term consequences of war and migration on young refugees.
Authors: Bushra Sabri; Karissa Avignon; Sarah Murray; Veronica P S Njie-Carr; Anna Marie Young; Amelia Noor-Oshiro; Joyell Arscott; Jill Messing; Jacquelyn C Campbell Journal: Affilia Date: 2020-12-14
Authors: Danielle Horyniak; Jason S Melo; Risa M Farrell; Victoria D Ojeda; Steffanie A Strathdee Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-07-13 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Lauritz Rudolf Floribert Müller; Karl Phillipp Büter; Rita Rosner; Johanna Unterhitzenberger Journal: Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health Date: 2019-01-30 Impact factor: 3.033