Literature DB >> 26107049

Using Edge Voxel Information to Improve Motion Regression for rs-fMRI Connectivity Studies.

Rémi Patriat1, Erin K Molloy2,3, Rasmus M Birn1,2.   

Abstract

Recent fMRI studies have outlined the critical impact of in-scanner head motion, particularly on estimates of functional connectivity. Common strategies to reduce the influence of motion include realignment as well as the inclusion of nuisance regressors, such as the 6 realignment parameters, their first derivatives, time-shifted versions of the realignment parameters, and the squared parameters. However, these regressors have limited success at noise reduction. We hypothesized that using nuisance regressors consisting of the principal components (PCs) of edge voxel time series would be better able to capture slice-specific and nonlinear signal changes, thus explaining more variance, improving data quality (i.e., lower DVARS and temporal SNR), and reducing the effect of motion on default-mode network connectivity. Functional MRI data from 22 healthy adult subjects were preprocessed using typical motion regression approaches as well as nuisance regression derived from edge voxel time courses. Results were evaluated in the presence and absence of both global signal regression and motion censoring. Nuisance regressors derived from signal intensity time courses at the edge of the brain significantly improved motion correction compared to using only the realignment parameters and their derivatives. Of the models tested, only the edge voxel regression models were able to eliminate significant differences in default-mode network connectivity between high- and low-motion subjects regardless of the use of global signal regression or censoring.

Keywords:  connectivity; edge voxels; motion correction; resting-state

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26107049      PMCID: PMC4652211          DOI: 10.1089/brain.2014.0321

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Connect        ISSN: 2158-0014


  55 in total

1.  Wandering minds: the default network and stimulus-independent thought.

Authors:  Malia F Mason; Michael I Norton; John D Van Horn; Daniel M Wegner; Scott T Grafton; C Neil Macrae
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-01-19       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  A component based noise correction method (CompCor) for BOLD and perfusion based fMRI.

Authors:  Yashar Behzadi; Khaled Restom; Joy Liau; Thomas T Liu
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-05-03       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Intrinsic functional connectivity as a tool for human connectomics: theory, properties, and optimization.

Authors:  Koene R A Van Dijk; Trey Hedden; Archana Venkataraman; Karleyton C Evans; Sara W Lazar; Randy L Buckner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Effective Preprocessing Procedures Virtually Eliminate Distance-Dependent Motion Artifacts in Resting State FMRI.

Authors:  Hang Joon Jo; Stephen J Gotts; Richard C Reynolds; Peter A Bandettini; Alex Martin; Robert W Cox; Ziad S Saad
Journal:  J Appl Math       Date:  2013-05-21

5.  Impact of in-scanner head motion on multiple measures of functional connectivity: relevance for studies of neurodevelopment in youth.

Authors:  Theodore D Satterthwaite; Daniel H Wolf; James Loughead; Kosha Ruparel; Mark A Elliott; Hakon Hakonarson; Ruben C Gur; Raquel E Gur
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-01-02       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Echo-planar imaging with prospective slice-by-slice motion correction using active markers.

Authors:  Melvyn B Ooi; Sascha Krueger; Jordan Muraskin; William J Thomas; Truman R Brown
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Automatic denoising of functional MRI data: combining independent component analysis and hierarchical fusion of classifiers.

Authors:  Gholamreza Salimi-Khorshidi; Gwenaëlle Douaud; Christian F Beckmann; Matthew F Glasser; Ludovica Griffanti; Stephen M Smith
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Is fMRI "noise" really noise? Resting state nuisance regressors remove variance with network structure.

Authors:  Molly G Bright; Kevin Murphy
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Removing motion and physiological artifacts from intrinsic BOLD fluctuations using short echo data.

Authors:  Molly G Bright; Kevin Murphy
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Addressing head motion dependencies for small-world topologies in functional connectomics.

Authors:  Chao-Gan Yan; R Cameron Craddock; Yong He; Michael P Milham
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-26       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  9 in total

1.  Head motion: the dirty little secret of neuroimaging in psychiatry

Authors:  Carolina Makowski; Martin Lepage; Alan C. Evans
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 6.186

2.  Integrative and Network-Specific Connectivity of the Basal Ganglia and Thalamus Defined in Individuals.

Authors:  Deanna J Greene; Scott Marek; Evan M Gordon; Joshua S Siegel; Caterina Gratton; Timothy O Laumann; Adrian W Gilmore; Jeffrey J Berg; Annie L Nguyen; Donna Dierker; Andrew N Van; Mario Ortega; Dillan J Newbold; Jacqueline M Hampton; Ashley N Nielsen; Kathleen B McDermott; Jarod L Roland; Scott A Norris; Steven M Nelson; Abraham Z Snyder; Bradley L Schlaggar; Steven E Petersen; Nico U F Dosenbach
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Resting-state test-retest reliability of a priori defined canonical networks over different preprocessing steps.

Authors:  Deepthi P Varikuti; Felix Hoffstaedter; Sarah Genon; Holger Schwender; Andrew T Reid; Simon B Eickhoff
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 3.270

4.  A set of functionally-defined brain regions with improved representation of the subcortex and cerebellum.

Authors:  Benjamin A Seitzman; Caterina Gratton; Scott Marek; Ryan V Raut; Nico U F Dosenbach; Bradley L Schlaggar; Steven E Petersen; Deanna J Greene
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  On time delay estimation and sampling error in resting-state fMRI.

Authors:  Ryan V Raut; Anish Mitra; Abraham Z Snyder; Marcus E Raichle
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-03-19       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Individualized Functional Subnetworks Connect Human Striatum and Frontal Cortex.

Authors:  Evan M Gordon; Timothy O Laumann; Scott Marek; Dillan J Newbold; Jacqueline M Hampton; Nicole A Seider; David F Montez; Ashley M Nielsen; Andrew N Van; Annie Zheng; Ryland Miller; Joshua S Siegel; Benjamin P Kay; Abraham Z Snyder; Deanna J Greene; Bradley L Schlaggar; Steven E Petersen; Steven M Nelson; Nico U F Dosenbach
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 4.861

7.  An improved model of motion-related signal changes in fMRI.

Authors:  Rémi Patriat; Richard C Reynolds; Rasmus M Birn
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 8.  Methods for cleaning the BOLD fMRI signal.

Authors:  César Caballero-Gaudes; Richard C Reynolds
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Combining Prospective Acquisition CorrEction (PACE) with retrospective correction to reduce motion artifacts in resting state fMRI data.

Authors:  Pradyumna Lanka; Gopikrishna Deshpande
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 2.708

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.