Literature DB >> 26106993

Computer-Aided Design and Computer-Aided Manufacturing Hydroxyapatite/Epoxide Acrylate Maleic Compound Construction for Craniomaxillofacial Bone Defects.

Lei Zhang1, Shunyao Shen, Hongbo Yu, Steve Guofang Shen, Xudong Wang.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the use of computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing hydroxyapatite (HA)/epoxide acrylate maleic (EAM) compound construction artificial implants for craniomaxillofacial bone defects. Computed tomography, computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing and three-dimensional reconstruction, as well as rapid prototyping were performed in 12 patients between 2008 and 2013. The customized HA/EAM compound artificial implants were manufactured through selective laser sintering using a rapid prototyping machine into the exact geometric shapes of the defect. The HA/EAM compound artificial implants were then implanted during surgical reconstruction. Color-coded superimpositions demonstrated the discrepancy between the virtual plan and achieved results using Geomagic Studio. As a result, the HA/EAM compound artificial bone implants were perfectly matched with the facial areas that needed reconstruction. The postoperative aesthetic and functional results were satisfactory. The color-coded superimpositions demonstrated good consistency between the virtual plan and achieved results. The three-dimensional maximum deviation is 2.12 ± 0.65  mm and the three-dimensional mean deviation is 0.27 ± 0.07  mm. No facial nerve weakness or pain was observed at the follow-up examinations. Only 1 implant had to be removed 2 months after the surgery owing to severe local infection. No other complication was noted during the follow-up period. In conclusion, computer-aided, individually fabricated HA/EAM compound construction artificial implant was a good craniomaxillofacial surgical technique that yielded improved aesthetic results and functional recovery after reconstruction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26106993     DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000001410

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniofac Surg        ISSN: 1049-2275            Impact factor:   1.046


  5 in total

Review 1.  3D bioprinting and craniofacial regeneration.

Authors:  Ruby Dwivedi; Divya Mehrotra
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2020-08-14

2.  Levofloxacin loaded mesoporous silica microspheres/nano-hydroxyapatite/polyurethane composite scaffold for the treatment of chronic osteomyelitis with bone defects.

Authors:  Qi Wang; Cheng Chen; Wen Liu; Xiaoqiang He; Nian Zhou; Dongli Zhang; Hongchen Gu; Jidong Li; Jiaxing Jiang; Wei Huang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 3.  Recent advances in the reconstruction of cranio-maxillofacial defects using computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing.

Authors:  Ji-Hyeon Oh
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2018-02-05

4.  Facial Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of Current Image Acquisition and Processing Techniques.

Authors:  Sam P Tarassoli; Matthew E Shield; Rhian S Allen; Zita M Jessop; Thomas D Dobbs; Iain S Whitaker
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2020-12-07

Review 5.  Advanced Hydrogel systems for mandibular reconstruction.

Authors:  Jiaxin Guo; Hao Yao; Xu Li; Liang Chang; Zixuan Wang; Wangyong Zhu; Yuxiong Su; Ling Qin; Jiankun Xu
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2022-08-22
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.