| Literature DB >> 26105992 |
Nikolay A Bogdanov1, Vamshi M Katukuri1, Judit Romhányi1, Viktor Yushankhai1,2, Vladislav Kataev3, Bernd Büchner3,4, Jeroen van den Brink1,4, Liviu Hozoi1.
Abstract
A promising route to tailoring the electronic properties of quantum materials and devices rests on the idea of orbital engineering in multilayered oxide heterostructures. Here we show that the interplay of interlayer charge imbalance and ligand distortions provides a knob for tuning the sequence of electronic levels even in intrinsically stacked oxides. We resolve in this regard the d-level structure of layered Sr2IrO4 by electron spin resonance. While canonical ligand-field theory predicts g||-factors less than 2 for positive tetragonal distortions as present in Sr2IrO4, the experiment indicates g|| is greater than 2. This implies that the iridium d levels are inverted with respect to their normal ordering. State-of-the-art electronic-structure calculations confirm the level switching in Sr2IrO4, whereas we find them in Ba2IrO4 to be instead normally ordered. Given the nonpolar character of the metal-oxygen layers, our findings highlight the tetravalent transition-metal 214 oxides as ideal platforms to explore d-orbital reconstruction in the context of oxide electronics.Entities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26105992 PMCID: PMC4491190 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms8306
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919
Figure 1TM t2g splittings for tetragonal distortions of the oxygen octahedron sans SOC.
(a) z axis compression of the octahedron corresponds to a tetragonal splitting δ<0, causes an orbital dublet to be lowest in energy and the g factors to be ordered as . (b) Elongation of the octahedron (δ>0) causes an orbital singlet to be lowest in energy and the g factors to be ordered as . Purple dashed lines indicate the conventional zero level used to define the sign of δ.
Figure 2ESR data for Sr2IrO4.
(a) Out-of-plane magnetic-field geometries; the inset shows a representative AFR spectrum. (b) In-plane magnetic fields; the inset demonstrates the g-factor anisotropy as function of the tetragonal distortion parameter α (see text). Symbols denote experimental data points—solid lines are theoretical curves using equations (2, 3, 4) and the quantum chemically computed g factors g||=2.31, g⊥=1.76 (see Table 1); dashed lines are calculated assuming isotropic g factors.
g factors for Sr2IrO4 and Ba2IrO4.
| Sr2IrO4 ( | ||||
| | 1.67 | 2.25 | 1.60 | 2.35 |
| | 1.81 | 2.27 | ||
| Ba2IrO4 ( | ||||
| | 2.00 | 1.61 | 2.01 | 1.60 |
| | 2.09 | 1.77 | ||
CASSCF=complete-active-space self-consistent-field; KDs=Kramers doublets; MRCI=multireference configuration-interaction. Results of many-body quantum chemistry calculations are shown. The left column displays the electron configurations entering the spin-orbit treatment. Only the high-spin sextet state is considered out of the manifold. Final results are indicated in bold face.
Figure 3Planar IrO2 network in Sr2IrO4.
(a) Coordination of the Ir site. Dashed lines show the boundaries of the crystallographic unit cell within a given IrO2 layer. (b) The point-group symmetry of the [Ir2O11] block is C2v; associated symmetry elements are indicated in the figure.
Nearest-neighbour magnetic couplings in Sr2IrO4.
| 47.8 | ±11.9 | 0.42 | −0.84 | 0.42 |
Results of spin-orbit MRCI calculations on two-octahedra clusters are displayed (meV). Γ+Γ+Γ=0 since is traceless.
Figure 4Effect of interlayer charge imbalance in A2IrO4 iridates.
(a) The nearby surroundings of TM sites in A2TMO4-layered perovskites. In test calculations one can assign the adjacent (in-plane) TM ions the formal charge QTM−2Δq, which is compensated by assigning the NN A sites the charge QA+Δq. (b) Tetragonal crystal-field energy splitting between t2g orbitals (δ) as a function of the charge redistribution Δq for Sr2IrO4 and Ba2IrO4.
Ir t 2g splittings and g factors for Sr2IrO4 and Ba2IrO4.
| Sr2IrO4: | |||
| CASSCF | −127 | 1.66 | 2.23 |
| NEVPT2 | −199 | 1.55 | 2.41 |
| Ba2IrO4: | |||
| CASSCF | 30 | 1.93 | 1.74 |
| NEVPT2 | 70 | 2.01 | 1.58 |
Results as obtained with the ORCA program66 are shown. Only the 2T2g() states were included in the CASSCF optimization and in the spin-orbit treatment.
Matrix elements of the ab initio spin-orbit Hamiltonian.
| | | | | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0.2308 | −0.1768 | 0 | |
| 〈 | −0.2308 | 48.3328 | 2.3083 | −1.6854 |
| 〈 | 0.1768 | −2.3083 | 48.9626 | 1.6266 |
| 0 | 1.6854 | −1.6266 | 49.0630 |
The latter is described by expression (6). Results of spin-orbit MRCI calculations are shown (meV). The two-site singlet and (split) triplet states are labelled and {|t〉, |t〉, }, respectively. Due to the antisymmetric exchange, and are admixtures of ‘pure' |0,0〉 and |1,0〉 spin functions.
Matrix elements of the effective spin Hamiltonian.
| | | | | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | |||
| 〈 | − | |||
| 〈 | ||||
| 0 |
The explicit form of the latter is given by (1); for additional notations we use here, see Table 6.
Notations used for anisotropic exchange coupling parameters in Sr2IrO4.
| ( | |||
| Γ | (Γ | ( | |
| Γ |
The definitions on the left-hand side are applied in Table 5. Other conventions presently employed in the literature are also shown for comparison.