| Literature DB >> 26105758 |
Kaustubh Adhikari1, Guillermo Reales1, Andrew J P Smith2, Esra Konka1, Jutta Palmen2, Mirsha Quinto-Sanchez3, Victor Acuña-Alonzo4, Claudia Jaramillo5, William Arias5, Macarena Fuentes6, María Pizarro6, Rodrigo Barquera Lozano7, Gastón Macín Pérez7, Jorge Gómez-Valdés8, Hugo Villamil-Ramírez9, Tábita Hunemeier10, Virginia Ramallo11, Caio C Silva de Cerqueira10, Malena Hurtado12, Valeria Villegas12, Vanessa Granja12, Carla Gallo12, Giovanni Poletti12, Lavinia Schuler-Faccini10, Francisco M Salzano10, Maria-Cátira Bortolini10, Samuel Canizales-Quinteros9, Francisco Rothhammer6, Gabriel Bedoya5, Rosario Calderón13, Javier Rosique14, Michael Cheeseman15, Mahmood F Bhutta16, Steve E Humphries17, Rolando Gonzalez-José3, Denis Headon15, David Balding18, Andrés Ruiz-Linares1.
Abstract
Here we report a genome-wide association study for non-pathological pinna morphology in over 5,000 Latin Americans. We find genome-wide significant association at seven genomic regions affecting: lobe size and attachment, folding of antihelix, helix rolling, ear protrusion and antitragus size (linear regression P values 2 × 10(-8) to 3 × 10(-14)). Four traits are associated with a functional variant in the Ectodysplasin A receptor (EDAR) gene, a key regulator of embryonic skin appendage development. We confirm expression of Edar in the developing mouse ear and that Edar-deficient mice have an abnormally shaped pinna. Two traits are associated with SNPs in a region overlapping the T-Box Protein 15 (TBX15) gene, a major determinant of mouse skeletal development. Strongest association in this region is observed for SNP rs17023457 located in an evolutionarily conserved binding site for the transcription factor Cartilage paired-class homeoprotein 1 (CART1), and we confirm that rs17023457 alters in vitro binding of CART1.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26105758 PMCID: PMC4491814 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms8500
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919
Figure 1Genome-wide associations of pinna traits.
Variation in 10 pinna traits was evaluated in 5,062 individuals. The photographs at the top indicate the location of the traits examined. At the bottom is shown a composite Manhattan plot for the seven traits showing genome-wide significant association with at least one genome region. The rs numbers for the most significantly associated (index) SNP in each region are provided (Table 1). Each of the seven regions on the Manhattan plot is connected with the associated trait on the photos via a line of different colour (composite panels in this and subsequent figures were made using Photoshop49).
Chromosomal location and −log10 (P) for index SNPs showing strongest genome-wide association to pinna traits.
SNP, single-nucleotide polymorphism. Trait acronyms (Fig. 1): AS, antitragus size; CHE, crus helix expression; DT, Darwin's tubercle; EP, ear protrusion; FoA, folding of antihelix; HR, helix rolling; LA, lobe attachment; LS, lobe size; SCoAE, superior crus of antihelix expression; TS, tragus size.
Genome-wide significant values (–log10 (P)>7.3) are highlighted in the darkest shade of red. Below this significance threshold, intensity of colour background is proportional to −log10 (P value). Effect sizes for associated alleles are shown in Fig. 2 and Supplementary Table 5. Intragenic SNPs are shown in bold. In 1p12, SNP rs17023457 is in an evolutionary conserved binding site for the CART1 transcription factor. GWAS P values were obtained using an additive multivariate regression model as described in Methods.
Figure 2Meta-analysis of significant genome-wide associations.
Effect sizes (in each country sample and in a combined meta-analysis) for the index SNPs and their associated traits (Table 1). Regression coefficients (x axis) estimated in each country are shown as blue boxes (box size indicating sample size). Red diamonds indicate effect sizes estimated in the meta-analysis. Horizontal bars indicate s.e. Results for all the SNPs and traits shown in Table 1 are provided in Supplementary Fig. 6A. The two alleles at each SNP are shown in brackets with effect size referring to the allele in the numerator.
Figure 3LocusZoom and linkage disequilibrium plots of significantly associated genetic regions.
Plots of the seven genomic regions showing genome-wide significant association to pinna traits (Table 1). For regions showing association with several pinna traits, we present here only results for the trait with strongest association (plots for the other associated traits are presented in Supplementary Fig. 7). Association results from a multivariate linear regression model (on a −log10 P scale; left y axis) are shown for SNPs ∼500 kb on either side of the index SNP (that is, the SNP with the smallest P value, purple diamond; Table 1) with the marker (dot) colour indicating the strength of LD (r2) between the index SNP and that SNP in the 1000 Genomes AMR data set. Local recombination rate in the AMR data is shown as a continuous blue line (scale on the right y axis). Genes in each region, their intron–exon structure, direction of transcription and genomic coordinates (in Mb, using the NCBI human genome sequence, Build 37, as reference) are shown at the bottom. Plots were produced with LocusZoom56. Below each region we also show an LD heatmap (using D′, ranging from red indicating D′=1 to white indicating D′=0) produced using Haploview57. Note that the location of SNPs on the LD heatmap can be shifted relative to the regional display on top of it.
Figure 4Effect of Edar genetic variation on mouse pinna shape.
(a) Whole-mount in situ hybridization detecting Edar expression in the developing mouse embryo at 15 days' gestation. (b–e) Impact of Edar genotype on mutant mouse ear shape. (b,c) Photographs of wild-type (b) and homozygous Edar (c) mutant mice from top and side views (respectively, on the upper and lower panels). (d,e) Boxplots, respectively, of ear protrusion angle and of landmark coordinate PC1 (y axis) for different mouse genotypes (x axis) (Supplementary Note 1; Supplementary Fig. 10 shows additional analyses for ear protrusion). Boxplot whiskers extend to data points within 1.5 times the interquartile range on both sides. In d,e numbers in parenthesis below genotypic categories refer to the number of mice examined for each. On the right of e are shown average PC1 wireframes for Edar homozygous mice (bottom) or for mice with other genotypes (top).