Literature DB >> 26105600

First-line erlotinib versus gemcitabine/cisplatin in patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: analyses from the phase III, randomized, open-label, ENSURE study.

Y-L Wu1, C Zhou2, C-K Liam3, G Wu4, X Liu5, Z Zhong6, S Lu7, Y Cheng8, B Han7, L Chen9, C Huang10, S Qin11, Y Zhu12, H Pan13, H Liang14, E Li15, G Jiang16, S H How17, M C L Fernando18, Y Zhang19, F Xia19, Y Zuo19.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The phase III, randomized, open-label ENSURE study (NCT01342965) evaluated first-line erlotinib versus gemcitabine/cisplatin (GP) in patients from China, Malaysia and the Philippines with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients ≥18 years old with histologically/cytologically confirmed stage IIIB/IV EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-2 were randomized 1:1 to receive erlotinib (oral; 150 mg once daily until progression/unacceptable toxicity) or GP [G 1250 mg/m(2) i.v. days 1 and 8 (3-weekly cycle); P 75 mg/m(2) i.v. day 1, (3-weekly cycle) for up to four cycles]. Primary end point: investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Other end points include objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and safety.
RESULTS: A total of 217 patients were randomized: 110 to erlotinib and 107 to GP. Investigator-assessed median PFS was 11.0 months versus 5.5 months, erlotinib versus GP, respectively [hazard ratio (HR), 0.34, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.22-0.51; log-rank P < 0.0001]. Independent Review Committee-assessed median PFS was consistent (HR, 0.42). Median OS was 26.3 versus 25.5 months, erlotinib versus GP, respectively (HR, 0.91, 95% CI 0.63-1.31; log-rank P = .607). ORR was 62.7% for erlotinib and 33.6% for GP. Treatment-related serious adverse events (AEs) occurred in 2.7% versus 10.6% of erlotinib and GP patients, respectively. The most common grade ≥3 AEs were rash (6.4%) with erlotinib, and neutropenia (25.0%), leukopenia (14.4%), and anemia (12.5%) with GP.
CONCLUSION: These analyses demonstrate that first-line erlotinib provides a statistically significant improvement in PFS versus GP in Asian patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC (NCT01342965).
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Asian; EGFR mutation-positive; NSCLC; erlotinib; first-line

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26105600     DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdv270

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  237 in total

1.  Clinical Implications of the T790M Mutation in Disease Characteristics and Treatment Response in Patients With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR)-Mutated Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC).

Authors:  Daria Gaut; Myung Shin Sim; Yuguang Yue; Brian R Wolf; Phillip A Abarca; James M Carroll; Jonathan W Goldman; Edward B Garon
Journal:  Clin Lung Cancer       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 4.785

Review 2.  Are immune checkpoint blockade monoclonal antibodies active against CNS metastases from NSCLC?-current evidence and future perspectives.

Authors:  Grainne M O'Kane; Natasha B Leighl
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2016-12

3.  Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Afatinib, Erlotinib, and Gefitinib as First-Line Treatments for EGFR Mutation-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in Ontario, Canada.

Authors:  Yong-Jin Kim; Mark Oremus; Helen H Chen; Thomas McFarlane; Danielle Fearon; Susan Horton
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 4.  Systemic Therapy of Lung Cancer CNS Metastases Using Molecularly Targeted Agents and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.

Authors:  Grainne M O'Kane; Natasha B Leighl
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 5.  Possible application of circulating free tumor DNA in non-small cell lung cancer patients.

Authors:  Niki Karachaliou; Aaron E Sosa; Miguel Angel Molina; Margarita Centelles Ruiz; Rafael Rosell
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 6.  The Impact of Translational Research in Hepatology.

Authors:  Johann von Felden; Amanda J Craig; Augusto Villanueva
Journal:  Clin Liver Dis (Hoboken)       Date:  2019-02-21

7.  Liquid biopsy mutation panel for non-small cell lung cancer: analytical validation and clinical concordance.

Authors:  Lee S Schwartzberg; Hidehito Horinouchi; David Chan; Sara Chernilo; Michaela L Tsai; Dolores Isla; Carles Escriu; John P Bennett; Kim Clark-Langone; Christer Svedman; Pascale Tomasini
Journal:  NPJ Precis Oncol       Date:  2020-06-24

8.  Afatinib for patients with epidermal growth factor receptor mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer: clinical implications of the LUX-Lung 7 study.

Authors:  Keunchil Park
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-12

9.  AURA 3: the last word on chemotherapy as a control arm in EGFR mutant NSCLC?

Authors:  Terry L Ng; D Ross Camidge
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-05

10.  Development of metastatic brain disease involves progression through lung metastases in EGFR mutated non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Gino In; Jeremy Mason; Sonia Lin; Paul K Newton; Peter Kuhn; Jorge Nieva
Journal:  Converg Sci Phys Oncol       Date:  2017-07-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.