Literature DB >> 26104806

Fatigue stipulation of bulk-fill composites: An in vitro appraisal.

Shruti A Vidhawan1, Adrian U Yap2, Barbara P Ornaghi3, Agnieszka Banas4, Krzysztof Banas4, Jennifer C Neo1, Carmem S Pfeifer5, Vinicius Rosa6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the Weibull and slow crack growth (SCG) parameters of bulk-fill resin based composites. The strength degradation over time of the materials was also assessed by strength-probability-time (SPT) analysis.
METHODS: Three bulk-fill [Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill (TBF); X-tra fil (XTR); Filtek Bulk-fill flowable (BFL)] and a conventional one [Filtek Z250 (Z250)] were studied. Seventy five disk-shaped specimens (12mm in diameter and 1mm thick) were prepared by inserting the uncured composites in a stainless steel split mold followed by photoactivation (1200mW/cm(2)/20s) and storage in distilled water (37°C/24h). Degree of conversion was evaluated in five specimens by analysis of FT-IR spectra obtained in the mid-IR region. The SCG parameters n (stress corrosion susceptibility coefficient) and σf0 (scaling parameter) were obtained by testing ten specimens in each of the five stress rates: 10(-2), 10(-1), 10(0), 10(1) and 10(2)MPa/s using a piston-on-three-balls device. Weibull parameter m (Weibull modulus) and σf0 (characteristic strength) were obtained by testing additional 20 specimens at 1MPa/s. Strength-probability-time (SPT) diagrams were constructed by merging SCG and Weibull parameters.
RESULTS: BFL and TBF presented higher n values, respectively (40.1 and 25.5). Z250 showed the highest (157.02MPa) and TBF the lowest (110.90MPa) σf0 value. Weibull analysis showed m (Weibull modulus) of 9.7, 8.6, 9.7 and 8.9 for TBF, BFL, XTR and Z250, respectively. SPT diagram for 5% probability of failure showed strength decrease of 18% for BFL, 25% for TBF, 32% for XTR and 36% for Z250, respectively, after 5 years as compared to 1 year. SIGNIFICANCE: The reliability and decadence of strength over time for bulk-fill resin composites studied are, at least, comparable to conventional composites. BFL shows the highest fatigue resistance under all simulations followed by TBF, while XTR was at par with Z250.
Copyright © 2015 Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dynamic fatigue; Resin composites; Strength degradation; Strength–probability–time diagram; Subcritical crack growth; Weibull analysis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26104806     DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2015.06.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dent Mater        ISSN: 0109-5641            Impact factor:   5.304


  3 in total

1.  Chlorhexidine-modified nanotubes and their effects on the polymerization and bonding performance of a dental adhesive.

Authors:  Sara Kalagi; Sabrina A Feitosa; Eliseu A Münchow; Victor M Martins; Ashley E Karczewski; N Blaine Cook; Kim Diefenderfer; George J Eckert; Saulo Geraldeli; Marco C Bottino
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 5.304

2.  Reliability, failure probability, and strength of resin-based materials for CAD/CAM restorations.

Authors:  Kiatlin Lim; Adrian U-Jin Yap; Shruti Vidhawan Agarwalla; Keson Beng-Choon Tan; Vinicius Rosa
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.698

3.  Effect of Stress Generated by Occlusal Cyclic Force on Class I Bulk-Fill Composite Restoration Microleakage.

Authors:  Apirat Ritthiti; Vanthana Sattabanasuk; Kavin Karunratanakul; Pisol Senawongse
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2021-10-21
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.