Literature DB >> 26104477

Transaxillary endoscopic breast augmentation with shaped gel implants.

Hyung-Bo Sim1, Sang-Hoon Sun1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: At its inception, transaxillary breast augmentation was a blind technique associated with complications and unpredictable outcomes. The transaxillary approach now involves electrocautery dissection with direct endoscopic visualization and yields excellent aesthetic outcomes with a concealed scar. Shaped implant devices can be combined with transaxillary augmentation for natural-appearing results that can be individualized to the patient.
OBJECTIVES: The authors sought to improve the results of transaxillary endoscopic breast augmentation by placing shaped gel implants in patients with an indistinct or absent inframammary fold (IMF), who wished to avoid a breast scar.
METHODS: One hundred sixteen Asian women underwent transaxillary endoscopic breast augmentation with electrocautery dissection and were evaluated in a prospective study. A partial retropectoral plane pocket was created in 4 sequential dissection steps with direct endoscopic visualization and careful control of bleeding. Shaped cohesive gel implants were placed to produce smooth, natural-appearing breast mounds and well-defined IMFs.
RESULTS: Patients were monitored for 6 to 24 months after surgery (mean, 10 months; median, 12 months). There were no instances of pneumothorax, instrument-related skin burns, or severe implant deformation due to rotation or displacement of the implants postoperatively. Three of 116 patients (2.6%) experienced Baker 3 unilateral capsular contracture. One patient developed a unilateral hematoma at 3 weeks after surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic breast surgery is associated with shortened recovery times, a reduced need for drainage, and excellent outcomes, including a well-defined and symmetric IMF. This approach, combined with shaped gel implants, can yield natural-appearing results of transaxillary breast augmentation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Therapeutic.
© 2015 The American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, Inc. Reprints and permission: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26104477     DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjv104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aesthet Surg J        ISSN: 1090-820X            Impact factor:   4.283


  4 in total

1.  The Application of Anatomy Combined With Ultrasound Knife in Transaxillary Endoscopic Biplane Breast Augmentation.

Authors:  Jiachao Xiong; Qiang Hou; Zheyuan Hu; Yakun Gao; Lu Lu; Meiqing Sun; Hao Hu; Yuxin Qian; Hui Wang; Hua Jiang
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-04-27

2.  Drainage Collection After Endoscopic-Assisted Transaxillary Dual-Plane Augmentation Mammaplasty Using Cold or Electrosurgical Separation of Interpectoral Space.

Authors:  Zifei Li; Dali Mu; Boyang Xu; Chenglong Wang; Hao Cheng; Shangshan Li; Jun Qi
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 0.947

Review 3.  A Shakespearean Dilemma in Breast Augmentation: to Use Drains or not? a Systematic Review : Drains in Breast Augmentation.

Authors:  Matteo Torresetti; Yasmine Zavalloni; Benedetta Peltristo; Giovanni Di Benedetto
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 2.708

4.  Endoscopic transaxillary prepectoral conversion for submuscular breast implants.

Authors:  Si-Hyun Park; Hyung-Bo Sim
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2018-03-05
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.