| Literature DB >> 26104408 |
Tian Gao1, Jiaolong Li1, Lin Zhang1, Yun Jiang2, Maowen Yin1, Yang Liu1, Feng Gao1, Guanghong Zhou1.
Abstract
The combined effect of tumbling marination methods (vacuum continuous tumbling marination, CT; vacuum intermittent tumbling marination, IT) and effective tumbling time (4, 6, 8, and 10 h) on the water status and protein properties of prepared pork chops was investigated. Results showed that regardless of tumbling time, CT method significantly decreased the muscle fiber diameter (MD) and significantly increased the total moisture content, product yield, salt soluble proteins (SSP) solubility, immobilized water component (p<0.05) compared with IT method. With the effective tumbling time increased from 4 h to 10 h, the fat content and the MD were significantly decreased (p<0.05), whereas the SSP solubility of prepared pork chops increased firstly and then decreased. Besides, an interactive effect between CT method and effective tumbling time was also observed for the chemical composition and proportion of immobilized water (p<0.05). These results demonstrated that CT method of 8 h was the most beneficial for improving the muscle structure and water distribution status, increasing the water-binding capacity and accelerating the marinade efficiency of pork chops; and thus, it should be chosen as the most optimal treatment method for the processing production of prepared pork chops.Entities:
Keywords: Continuous; Intermittent; Prepared Pork Chop; Protein Property; Tumbling Time; Water Status
Year: 2015 PMID: 26104408 PMCID: PMC4478494 DOI: 10.5713/ajas.14.0918
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Asian-Australas J Anim Sci ISSN: 1011-2367 Impact factor: 2.509
Effect of different tumbling marination methods and time on the chemical composition and product yield of prepared pork chops
| Items | Protein (%) | Moisture (%) | Fat (%) | Product yield (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CT-4h | 20.48±0.14 | 75.45±0.08 | 2.18±0.11 | 103.26±1.05 |
| CT-6h | 20.32±0.21 | 75.46±0.05 | 1.98±0.09 | 103.83±0.72 |
| CT-8h | 19.95±0.18 | 76.49±0.12 | 1.67±0.09 | 103.79±1.17 |
| CT-10h | 19.25± 0.15 | 76.83±0.05 | 1.17±0.06 | 104.73±1.72 |
| IT-4h | 20.44±0.08 | 73.91±0.03 | 2.18±0.16 | 101.23±1.00 |
| IT-6h | 19.96±0.14 | 73.48±0.19 | 1.74±0.17 | 100.95±1.56 |
| IT-8h | 19.65±0.22 | 75.32±0.11 | 1.54±0.05 | 101.74±0.72 |
| IT-10h | 19.05±0.12 | 72.98±0.14 | 1.29±0.02 | 101.86±1.98 |
| Methods | ||||
| CT | 20.25±0.24 | 76.06±0.64 | 1.75±0.40 | 103.91±1.18 |
| IT | 19.77±0.54 | 73.92±0.91 | 1.69±0.35 | 101.44±1.26 |
| Time | ||||
| 4 h | 20.46±0.11 | 74.68±0.85 | 2.18±0.07 | 102.24±1.44 |
| 6 h | 20.14±0.24 | 74.47±1.09 | 1.86±0.17 | 102.39±1.92 |
| 8 h | 19.80±0.22 | 75.90±0.65 | 1.61±0.09 | 102.76±1.42 |
| 10 h | 19.65±0.67 | 74.91±2.11 | 1.23±0.08 | 103.29±2.28 |
| Two-way analysis of variance | ||||
| Methods | 0.073 | <0.0001 | 0.113 | 0.001 |
| Time | 0.006 | 0.264 | <0.0001 | 0.530 |
| Interaction | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | 0.014 | 0.893 |
CT, vacuum continuous tumbling marination; IT, vacuum intermittent tumbling marination.
Means with different letters in the same column (within each main effect or interaction) are significantly different (p<0.05). Values are reported as means±standard deviation of three replicates.
Effect of different tumbling marination methods and time on the SSP solubility, muscle fiber diameter and the T2 peak area ratio of prepared pork chops
| Items | SSP solubility (mg/mL) | MD (μm) | PI (%) | PII (%) | PIII (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CT-4h | 0.98±0.01 | 78.08±0.95 | 0.044±0.001 | 0.949±0.001 | 0.007±0.001 |
| CT-6h | 1.05±0.02 | 74.19±0.96 | 0.034±0.001 | 0.949±0.002 | 0.017±0.002 |
| CT-8h | 1.16±0.02 | 68.87±1.32 | 0.032±0.002 | 0.964±0.002 | 0.005±0.001 |
| CT-10h | 0.89±0.01 | 59.52±0.62 | 0.035±0.003 | 0.959±0.003 | 0.006±0.003 |
| IT-4h | 0.88±0.03 | 82.89±0.98 | 0.030±0.002 | 0.950±0.002 | 0.019±0.003 |
| IT-6h | 1.04±0.07 | 77.09±1.25 | 0.031±0.003 | 0.949±0.004 | 0.020±0.005 |
| IT-8h | 1.06±0.06 | 73.72±0.92 | 0.029±0.001 | 0.951±0.002 | 0.022±0.004 |
| IT-10h | 0.85±0.01 | 62.38±0.78 | 0.031±0.001 | 0.955±0.004 | 0.015±0.002 |
| Methods | |||||
| CT | 1.02±0.10 | 70.17±7.29 | 0.036±0.005 | 0.955±0.007 | 0.009±0.005 |
| IT | 0.96±0.10 | 74.02±7.86 | 0.030±0.001 | 0.951±0.003 | 0.019±0.004 |
| Time | |||||
| 4 h | 0.93±0.06 | 80.49±2.76 | 0.037±0.007 | 0.950±0.001 | 0.014±0.007 |
| 6 h | 1.04±0.05 | 75.64±1.87 | 0.032±0.002 | 0.949±0.003 | 0.019±0.004 |
| 8 h | 1.11±0.07 | 71.29±2.72 | 0.030±0.002 | 0.957±0.007 | 0.013±0.009 |
| 10 h | 0.87±0.03 | 60.95±1.68 | 0.033±0.003 | 0.956±0.004 | 0.010±0.005 |
| Two-way analysis of variance | |||||
| Methods | 0.001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | 0.001 | <0.0001 |
| Time | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | 0.001 | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Interaction | 0.114 | 0.092 | 0.001 | 0.005 | 0.008 |
SSP, salt soluble proteins; MD, muscle fiber diameter; NMR, nuclear magnetic resonance; PI, the T21 peak area ratio of NMR graph; PII, the T22 peak area ratio of NMR graph; PIII, the T23 peak area ratio of NMR graph; CT, vacuum continuous tumbling marination; IT, vacuum intermittent tumbling marination.
Means with different letters in the same column (within each main effect or interaction) are significantly different (p<0.05). Values are reported as means±standard deviation of three replicates.
Figure 1Light microscopy of cross sections of muscle fibers of pork chops prepared by different tumbling marination methods and time (a, vacuum continuous tumbling marination for 4 h; b, vacuum continuous tumbling marination for 6 h; c, vacuum continuous tumbling marination for 8 h; d, vacuum continuous tumbling marination for 10 h; e, vacuum intermittent tumbling marination for 6 h; f, vacuum intermittent tumbling marination for 9 h; g, vacuum intermittent tumbling marination for 12 h; h, vacuum intermittent tumbling marination for 15 h; 10× magnification, representative of n = 3).
Figure 2Effect of different tumbling marination methods and time on the T2 relaxometry time (ms) of prepared pork chops (representative of n = 3).